Honestly, trying to pin down exactly when was Second Corinthians written feels a bit like trying to reconstruct a heated group chat from a decade ago when half the messages were deleted. It’s chaotic. It’s emotional. It’s deeply human. Unlike some of the more "orderly" books of the Bible, 2 Corinthians reads like a man who is exhausted, defensive, and fiercely loyal all at once. If you’ve ever had to write a follow-up email to someone who totally misunderstood your first one, you’ll get the vibe.
Most scholars who spend their lives staring at Greek manuscripts and historical records land on 55 AD or 56 AD.
But that’s a boring answer. The real story isn't just a date on a calendar; it’s about a relationship that was falling apart in real-time. Paul was in Ephesus, things were going sideways in Corinth, and he was basically playing ecclesiastical fire extinguisher. To understand the timing, you have to understand the "Painful Visit" and the "Sorrowful Letter."
The Chaos in Corinth and the 55 AD Window
Paul didn't just sit down and write this letter in a vacuum. By the time he penned 2 Corinthians, he was already deep in the weeds with this specific church.
History tells us Paul founded the church in Corinth around 50–52 AD. He stayed there for eighteen months, living with Aquila and Priscilla, making tents, and generally getting the community off the ground. But then he left. And as soon as the founder walks out the door, things usually get weird.
By 54 AD, he wrote 1 Corinthians from Ephesus to fix some pretty wild problems—lawsuits, communion-table brawls, and some very questionable lifestyle choices. But that letter didn't quite do the trick. Things got worse.
Why the Date Matters
If 1 Corinthians was written in early 55 AD, then 2 Corinthians had to follow shortly after, likely in the autumn of 55 AD or the spring of 56 AD. This timeline is anchored by the mention of Titus. Paul sent Titus to Corinth to see how they’d reacted to his previous (and very harsh) instructions. Paul was so anxious about the outcome that he couldn't even focus on his work in Troas. He went to Macedonia specifically to find Titus and get the update.
When Titus finally showed up with good news—that the Corinthians actually felt bad and wanted to make things right—Paul breathed a sigh of relief. That sigh of relief is basically the first seven chapters of 2 Corinthians.
🔗 Read more: Finding the Right Word That Starts With AJ for Games and Everyday Writing
The Problem of the "Two-Letter" Theory
Here is where it gets spicy for the history nerds.
Some people think 2 Corinthians wasn't written all at once. If you read the book straight through, you’ll notice something jarring. Chapters 1 through 9 are generally warm, reconciled, and hopeful. Then, suddenly, Chapter 10 hits. The tone shifts instantly. Paul starts defending his apostleship with a ferocity that feels like he’s shouting.
"I repeat: Let no one take me for a fool. But if you do, then tolerate me ought as a fool, so that I may do a little boasting." (2 Corinthians 11:16)
Because of this "mood swing," many scholars—including heavyweights like those cited in the Oxford Bible Commentary—suggest that what we call 2 Corinthians might actually be two or three different letters stitched together later.
If that’s true, the "when" becomes even more complex.
- The "Reconciliation" part (Chapters 1–7) likely dates to late 55 AD.
- The "Severe" part (Chapters 10–13) might actually be the "Sorrowful Letter" Paul mentions earlier, which would mean it was written before the rest of the book, perhaps in mid-55 AD.
- Or, it’s a later letter written in 56 AD when new "Super-Apostles" showed up to trash his reputation again.
Personally? I think Paul was just a complex guy. You can be happy with someone and still have a lot of baggage to work through in the same conversation. Ever had a long talk with a partner where you're crying and hugging one minute and then arguing about something from three years ago the next? That’s 2 Corinthians.
Real-World Markers: Gallio and the Roman Connection
How do we even know it was the 50s? We aren't just guessing based on Paul’s mood. We have the Gallio Inscription.
💡 You might also like: Is there actually a legal age to stay home alone? What parents need to know
In the early 20th century, archaeologists found an inscription at Delphi that mentions Lucius Junius Gallio Annaeanus, the proconsul of Achaia. It dates his term specifically to 51–52 AD. Since the Book of Acts tells us Paul was brought before this exact Gallio during his first stay in Corinth, we have a fixed point in history.
Working forward from 52 AD:
- Paul leaves Corinth (52 AD).
- Paul spends three years in Ephesus (52–55 AD).
- He writes the "Lost Letter" (not in the Bible).
- He writes 1 Corinthians (Early 55 AD).
- The "Painful Visit" happens.
- He writes 2 Corinthians from Macedonia (Late 55 AD).
It’s a tight timeline. It shows just how fast the early church was moving and how high the stakes were.
The Impact of the Collection
One of the best clues for when was Second Corinthians written is the "Collection for the Saints." Paul was obsessed with raising money for the impoverished Christians in Jerusalem. He mentions this project in 1 Corinthians 16 and again in 2 Corinthians 8 and 9.
He tells the Corinthians that they were the first to want to give, a whole year prior. This "year ago" reference (2 Corinthians 8:10) is a massive chronological anchor. It tells us that roughly twelve months had passed since he first challenged them to save up their money.
If he started the collection in early 54 AD, we are looking at a 55 AD completion for the letter. It’s consistent. It’s logical.
Why Should You Care About a Date From 2,000 Years Ago?
Knowing the date isn't just about winning a trivia night at a pub. It changes how you read the text. When you realize Paul wrote this just months after being nearly killed in a riot in Ephesus, his talk about "jars of clay" and "outwardly wasting away" isn't poetic fluff. It’s a man describing his literal physical and mental state in the year 55 AD.
📖 Related: The Long Haired Russian Cat Explained: Why the Siberian is Basically a Living Legend
He was tired. He was being slandered by people who thought he wasn't "impressive" enough. By pinning down the timeline, we see a leader who was struggling with burnout and betrayal but still refused to quit.
Key Takeaways for the Timeline
If you're studying this or writing a paper, keep these specific points in mind:
- The Macedonia Connection: Paul definitely wrote this from Macedonia, not Ephesus. He had just escaped the latter and was waiting for Titus.
- The 55-56 AD Range: This is the consensus among most modern historians (like N.T. Wright or Ben Witherington III).
- The Missing Letters: Remember that 2 Corinthians is likely at least the fourth letter Paul wrote to this church, even though only two are in our Bibles.
- Titus as the Catalyst: The timing of the letter is entirely dependent on Titus's travel schedule between Greece and Turkey.
Actionable Insights for Further Study
To get a deeper handle on the context of this letter, your next steps shouldn't just be reading more dates. Try this:
1. Compare the "Tone Shift"
Read Chapter 7 and then jump immediately to Chapter 10. Ask yourself if you think it's the same letter. Seeing the stark difference helps you understand the debate over whether this was one sitting or a composite of several notes sent during that turbulent year.
2. Map the Third Missionary Journey
Get a map of the Mediterranean and trace Paul's route from Ephesus to Troas, then to Macedonia, and finally down to Corinth. Seeing the geography makes the "waiting for Titus" narrative much more real. It was a long walk/sail for a man in his 50s.
3. Cross-Reference with Acts 20
Read Acts 20:1-3 alongside 2 Corinthians. It covers the same period. Acts gives you the "what happened," while 2 Corinthians gives you the "how Paul felt about it."
4. Investigate the Gallio Inscription
Search for photos of the Delphi Inscription. It’s one of the few times biblical history and secular Roman archaeology "click" together perfectly to give us a hard date. It’s the anchor for the entire Pauline timeline.