You’re reading a book. Or maybe you're watching a movie. Suddenly, the narrator starts telling you what the villain is thinking, even though we’ve spent the last four chapters stuck inside the hero's head. It feels jarring, right? It’s like a camera lens suddenly smudging or a radio station drifting into static. That glitch in your brain is actually a reaction to a shift in what's point of view.
POV is the literal and figurative lens through which a story is told. It determines what information the audience receives and, more importantly, what is kept hidden. Most people think it's just about using "I" or "he," but it's deeper. It’s about the "psychological distance" between the reader and the character.
The Mechanical Reality of What's Point of View
Let's get the textbook stuff out of the way first. You've got your first-person, where the narrator is a character in the story. They use "I" and "me." It's intimate. You're basically wearing their skin. Then there’s third-person, which splits into "limited" and "omniscient."
Limited means the narrator stays glued to one person’s shoulder. They know what Joe thinks, but they have no clue why Sarah is crying unless Joe asks her. Omniscient is the "God mode" of storytelling. The narrator knows everyone’s secrets, the history of the town, and probably what’s going to happen three years from now.
But here’s the thing.
People mess this up constantly by "head-hopping." This happens when a writer is in a limited POV but accidentally slips into another character's thoughts for a single sentence. It’s a massive technical error that kills immersion. If you’re writing from Joe’s perspective and you say, "Sarah felt a sudden pang of regret," you’ve broken the rules. Joe can’t see her regret. He can only see her frown or hear her voice crack. Understanding what's point of view in a professional sense means respecting the boundaries of the chosen perspective.
The Reliability Factor
Ever heard of the "unreliable narrator"? This is where POV gets spicy. When you use first-person, you’re trusting someone who might be a liar, a narcissist, or just plain confused. Think of The Girl on the Train or Lolita. In these cases, the point of view is a tool for deception. The author is using the narrowness of the perspective to hide the truth from you. It’s brilliant when done well, but it’s a tightrope walk.
Why First Person Isn't Always the "Easy" Choice
New writers flock to first-person because it feels natural. We live our lives in first-person, after all. But it’s actually incredibly restrictive. If your main character gets knocked unconscious, the scene ends. Period. You can't describe the cool explosion that happened while they were out cold because, well, they didn't see it.
Third-person limited is often the sweet spot for modern fiction. It offers the intimacy of first-person but allows for a bit more descriptive breathing room. You can describe the character from the outside in a way that doesn't feel like they're staring in a mirror (the "I looked in the mirror and noticed my piercing blue eyes" trope is a death sentence for quality writing).
The "Deep POV" Trend
Lately, editors and agents are obsessed with something called "Deep POV." This is a stylistic choice where you strip away "filter words."
Standard POV: He felt the cold wind bite at his cheeks and thought that winter was finally here.
Deep POV: The wind bit at his cheeks. Winter was finally here.
Notice the difference? By removing "he felt" and "he thought," you pull the reader closer to the experience. You aren't telling the reader what the character is experiencing; you are letting the reader experience it alongside them. It’s a subtle shift in what's point of view represents—moving from a report of an event to a lived experience.
✨ Don't miss: Knock Down Ceiling Texture: Why It is Actually Better Than Popcorn or Smooth Finishes
Breaking the Fourth Wall
Then you have the weird stuff. Second-person. "You walk into the room. You see the shadow." It’s rare outside of "Choose Your Own Adventure" books or certain experimental literary novels like Bright Lights, Big City. It’s aggressive. It demands the reader take on a role they might not want. It’s a high-risk, high-reward strategy that usually fails because it feels gimmicky.
The Impact on Non-Fiction and Journalism
We talk about POV in stories, but it's just as vital in the news. "Objective" journalism is supposed to be a neutral third-person POV. But is it? Every choice of which quote to include or which fact to lead with is a reflection of a perspective.
When you ask what's point of view in a news context, you're really asking about bias. Even a "neutral" camera angle in a documentary conveys a message. A low-angle shot makes a subject look powerful; a high-angle shot makes them look weak. Perspective is never truly neutral. It’s always an editorial choice.
Real-World Examples of POV Mastery
Look at George R.R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire. The entire series is built on shifting third-person limited perspectives. Each chapter is named after a character. We only know what that character knows. This allows Martin to create massive dramatic irony. We see one character plan a betrayal, and in the next chapter, we see the victim walking blindly into the trap. If the book were written in a single omniscient POV, that tension would evaporate.
On the flip side, look at classic 19th-century novels. Dickens or Tolstoy loved the omniscient narrator. They’d pause the story to lecture the reader about the state of the legal system or the nature of history. It worked then because readers had more patience for a "grand narrator." Today, we want to be in the dirt with the characters.
Common Misconceptions
- POV is just about pronouns. False. It's about access to information.
- Omniscient is the same as head-hopping. No. Omniscient is a deliberate choice to see everything. Head-hopping is an accidental slip between limited perspectives.
- First person is more "truthful." Actually, it's often the most biased and deceptive.
Actionable Steps for Mastering Perspective
If you’re trying to sharpen your own writing or just want to be a more critical reader, start here:
Identify the "Filter Words"
Scan your writing for words like saw, heard, felt, realized, decided, noticed. These are signposts that you are standing outside the character. Try deleting them and rewriting the sentence to show the action directly.
Check for "Camera Creep"
Are you describing something your POV character couldn't possibly know? If they're in a dark room, don't describe the color of the curtains unless they have a flashlight. If they're in a heated argument, don't describe the "look of secret triumph" on the other person's face unless it's an obvious smirk. Keep it grounded in their physical reality.
Pick a Distance and Stick to It
Decide how close you want to be. Do you want to be inside their head (Deep POV) or a bit more detached, like a fly on the wall (Cinematic POV)? Once you choose, stay there. Consistency is what creates a professional-feeling narrative.
The "Why This Person?" Test
If you're writing a scene, ask yourself: Why am I telling this from Sarah's POV instead of Mark's? Who has the most to lose in this scene? Usually, the person with the highest emotional stakes should be the one whose perspective we follow.
💡 You might also like: Why University of Colorado Boulder Events Are More Than Just Football and Parties
Watch for Tense Shifts
Often, when people struggle with POV, they also struggle with tense. If you’re in first-person present ("I walk"), don't suddenly slip into past tense ("I saw"). It sounds simple, but it happens more than you’d think, especially in long-form content.
Understanding what's point of view boils down to one thing: control. It is the control of information and emotion. When you master it, you don't just tell a story; you create a world that feels real because the limitations of the perspective mimic the limitations of being human. We don't know everything. We only know what we see, what we feel, and what we choose to believe. Your writing should reflect that same beautiful, messy reality.
Start by auditing your current project. Pick one scene and rewrite it from the perspective of the least important character in the room. You'll be surprised at how much the "truth" of the scene changes when the lens shifts. This exercise forces you to abandon your "authorial" knowledge and stick strictly to what that minor character would observe, which is the best training for maintaining a tight, professional POV.
Once you can hold a single perspective for 2,000 words without a single slip-up, you’ve moved past the amateur stage. It’s not about being a "God" narrator; it’s about being a disciplined observer. Focus on the sensory details—what the character smells, the grit under their fingernails, the way their heart thumps—and the POV will naturally tighten itself. This creates the "flow" state that readers crave and Google's algorithms increasingly reward in high-quality, human-centric content.
---