Honestly, if you ask someone today to pin down exactly what year was the OJ Simpson trial, you’ll probably get a few different answers. Some people swear it was 1994 because that’s when the white Bronco chase happened. Others think it was later in the 90s because of how long the media circus lasted.
But the reality? The criminal trial—the one with the "Dream Team" and the glove that didn't fit—started in January 1995 and ended in October 1995.
👉 See also: TV Shows With Zena Grey: Why the House Star Disappeared (and What She's Doing Now)
It was a weird, heavy time in America. We were only a few years removed from the 1992 LA Riots. Trust in the LAPD was basically at zero for a lot of people. Then, suddenly, the most famous athlete-turned-movie-star in the country is being accused of a brutal double murder. It wasn't just a court case; it was a cultural earthquake that reshaped how we watch TV and how we talk about race.
The Timeline: When Everything Actually Happened
You've gotta separate the crime from the trial to make sense of the dates. The murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman happened on June 12, 1994, outside Nicole’s condo in Brentwood.
That summer was intense. You had the slow-speed chase on June 17—95 million people watched a white Ford Bronco crawl down the 405. But the actual "Trial of the Century" didn't seat a jury and start opening statements until January 24, 1995.
It lasted for eight grueling months. Judge Lance Ito presided over it, and he made the controversial call to allow cameras in the room. That one decision basically invented modern "true crime" and reality TV. People weren't just reading headlines; they were watching Marcia Clark and Johnnie Cochran argue in real-time while they ate lunch.
The whole thing finally wrapped up on October 3, 1995, with that "Not Guilty" verdict that essentially stopped the world for a few minutes. If you were alive then, you remember where you were. It was one of those "monoculture" moments we just don't have anymore.
Why 1995 Felt Like a Lifetime
If it feels like the trial lasted longer than a year, that’s because the legal fallout didn't stop in '95.
✨ Don't miss: Humanist Vampire Seeking Consenting Suicidal Person Cast: Who Really Brought This Deadpan Gem to Life?
After the criminal acquittal, the victims' families—the Goldmans and the Browns—weren't finished. They filed a civil lawsuit. That civil trial happened in 1997, and it had a totally different outcome. In that case, the jury found Simpson "liable" for the deaths and ordered him to pay $33.5 million in damages.
So, when people ask about the "year" of the trial, they’re usually thinking of the 1995 criminal circus, but the legal saga actually stretched from 1994 all the way through the late 90s.
The Key Players You Probably Forgot
It’s easy to remember OJ and Johnnie Cochran, but the room was packed with people who became household names overnight:
- Marcia Clark & Christopher Darden: The lead prosecutors who had a "mountain of evidence" but struggled to connect with the jury.
- The Dream Team: Not just Cochran, but Robert Shapiro, F. Lee Bailey, and even Robert Kardashian (yes, that Kardashian).
- Mark Fuhrman: The LAPD detective whose history of racial slurs became the pivot point for the defense.
- Kato Kaelin: The houseguest with the shaggy hair who became a weird sort of 1990s folk hero/punchline.
The Evidence That (Mostly) Came From 1995
The prosecution thought they had an open-and-shut case. They had DNA. In 1995, DNA was still "new" to the general public. Prosecutors spent weeks—literally weeks—explaining science to a jury that was getting bored and confused.
They had:
- Blood drops at the crime scene that matched OJ's DNA.
- A bloody glove at the scene and its mate behind OJ’s house.
- Bloody shoe prints from a rare size 12 Bruno Magli shoe (which OJ claimed he never owned, though photos later proved otherwise).
- Blood in the Bronco.
But the defense was brilliant at sowing doubt. They didn't have to prove OJ didn't do it; they just had to prove the LAPD could have framed him. They focused on "Garbage in, Garbage out"—the idea that if the police were sloppy or racist, none of the science mattered.
📖 Related: Lily Phillips 100 Men Project: What Really Happened Behind the Scenes
How the Trial Changed Everything
It’s hard to overstate how much this one year changed the world. Before 1995, we didn't have 24-hour news cycles that obsessed over a single story for months.
We also didn't have the same level of skepticism toward forensic labs. The trial forced police departments across the country to tighten up how they handled evidence. It also highlighted the "racial gap" in America. Polls at the time showed a massive divide: most white Americans thought he was guilty, while most Black Americans saw the acquittal as a rare victory against a corrupt system.
Actionable Takeaways: How to Actually Study the Case Today
If you’re looking to get the full story without the 90s bias, there are a few ways to dive back in that are actually worth your time.
First, watch the documentary "O.J.: Made in America." It’s an ESPN 30 for 30, and it’s probably the best piece of media ever made on the subject. It doesn't just look at the trial; it looks at Los Angeles in the decades leading up to it. It explains why the jury felt the way they did.
Second, if you want the legal "why," look up the Fuhrman Tapes. Understanding the impact of those tapes is the only way to understand why the "mountain of evidence" didn't lead to a conviction. It turned a murder trial into a trial about the LAPD’s soul.
Finally, keep the dates straight. 1994 was the crime. 1995 was the trial. 1997 was the civil judgment. Everything else is just static.
If you're researching this for a project or just out of curiosity, focus on the "Reasonable Doubt" standard. The OJ trial is the ultimate masterclass in how a defense team doesn't need to be "right"—they just need to be louder and more organized than the prosecution.
To dig deeper, you should look into the specific jury instructions Judge Ito gave before deliberation. It explains a lot about how the "not guilty" verdict was reached despite the physical evidence. You can find the original 1995 trial transcripts through the UMKC School of Law archives; they're the gold standard for factual accuracy.