Nobody actually knows the answer. Honestly, if anyone tells you they have a definitive name for the very first language, they’re probably selling you a specific religious text or a very shaky "fringe" science theory. Scientists don’t have a recording of the first word. There are no fossils of a sentence. Because sound waves don’t petrify in the mud like dinosaur bones, we’re left piecing together a massive, prehistoric puzzle using genetics, skull shapes, and the way modern toddlers learn to ask for juice.
When we ask what was first language, we are really asking when our ancestors stopped grunting like sophisticated apes and started using symbolic sounds to describe the world. This transition didn't happen overnight. It wasn't like a light switch flipped in a cave somewhere in East Africa and suddenly everyone was debating the weather. It was slow. It was likely messy. It probably involved a lot of gesturing and weird clicking noises that would sound totally alien to us today.
The Proto-World hypothesis and why it’s controversial
Some linguists, like Merritt Ruhlen, have spent years arguing for something called "Proto-Human." This is the idea that every single language spoken today—from Mandarin to English to the clicking languages of the San people—descends from one single source. It’s a tidy idea. It feels right. If we all came from the same small group of humans in Africa roughly 200,000 years ago, wouldn't we have started with one vocabulary?
Ruhlen and his colleagues looked at "global etymologies." They found words that seem to crop up everywhere. Take the sound "aq’a," which means water in several unrelated language families. They argue this isn't a coincidence. They think it's a linguistic fossil. But most mainstream linguists, the ones who get published in big journals like Language or Nature, think this is mostly guesswork. They argue that languages change so fast—literally every thousand years they become unrecognizable—that trying to trace them back 100,000 years is like trying to find a specific drop of water in the middle of a hurricane.
The "monogenesis" theory (one origin) vs. "polygenesis" (many origins) is the biggest beef in linguistics. If humans developed language in different spots at different times, there was never a "first" language. There were dozens.
The gesture-first theory
There's a very real possibility that the first language wasn't spoken at all. Think about it. If you’re hunting a mammoth, shouting "Hey, look over there!" is a great way to lose your dinner. Hand signals are silent. They’re precise.
Researchers like Michael Corballis argue that our brains were wired for complex gestures long before our throats were ready for complex speech. Our ancestors probably used a sophisticated form of sign language. Eventually, they started adding grunts to emphasize the signs. Slowly, the sounds became more important than the hands because you can "talk" in the dark or while your hands are full of berries. If this is true, the first language was a series of hand waves and facial contortions.
Why the FOXP2 gene changed the game
We have to talk about biology because language isn't just culture; it’s physical. The FOXP2 gene is often called the "language gene." It’s not actually that simple—genes rarely do just one thing—but we know that if this gene is mutated, people have massive trouble with speech and grammar.
Around 300,000 to 400,000 years ago, a specific mutation in this gene became common in our ancestors. This might have been the "biological Big Bang" for language. Neandertals actually had a version of this gene too. Does that mean Neandertals had a language? Probably. It might have been high-pitched or weirdly melodic compared to ours, but they were likely chatting about something.
But here’s the kicker: just because you have the hardware doesn't mean you have the software. A computer without an OS is just a box of metal. Having the gene and the vocal tract (the descended larynx) was the hardware. The "first language" was the software that humans had to write themselves through social interaction.
The "Mother Tongue" vs. the "Social Grooming" idea
Robin Dunbar, a famous evolutionary psychologist, has this wild theory that language replaced grooming. Monkeys spend hours picking bugs off each other to bond. It’s slow. It only works one-on-one. As human groups got bigger, we needed a faster way to bond. We needed "vocal grooming."
Language allowed us to gossip. Honestly, the first language was probably 90% gossip. Who is sleeping with whom? Who stole the good flint? Who can be trusted? This wasn't about poetry or describing the stars; it was about survival in a tribe. If you knew who the liars were, you lived longer.
Could it have been Sumerian or Egyptian?
This is a common misconception. People often point to Sumerian or Ancient Egyptian as the "first" language because they are the oldest written languages. We have Sumerian tablets from about 3200 BCE.
But writing is brand new.
If human history were a 24-hour clock, writing only showed up in the last few minutes. By the time the Sumerians were scratching marks into clay, humans had been speaking for at least 100,000 years. Sumerian is a "language isolate," meaning it doesn't seem to relate to any other known language, which makes it mysterious and cool. But it wasn't the first. It was just the first one that someone was smart enough to write down so it wouldn't be forgotten.
The "Bow-Wow" and "Pooh-Pooh" theories
Early philosophers had hilarious names for how language started:
- The Bow-Wow Theory: We just mimicked animal sounds. "Woof" became the word for dog.
- The Pooh-Pooh Theory: Language started with instinctive cries of pain, surprise, or disgust. "Ouch!" or "Yuck!"
- The Yo-He-Ho Theory: It came from rhythmic chants used during heavy lifting.
While these sound like jokes, there’s a kernel of truth there. Onomatopoeia (words that sound like what they mean) exists in every language. But "ouch" isn't a language. A language needs syntax. It needs a way to say "I'll bring the berries tomorrow if it doesn't rain." That jump from "Ouch!" to "Tomorrow" is the real mystery of what was first language.
The weird case of "Language Deprivation"
We can’t ethically experiment on babies to see if they’d invent a language if left alone. But history has given us some grim "forbidden experiments." King Psamtik I of Egypt supposedly gave two newborns to a shepherd and told him never to speak to them. He wanted to see what their first words would be. Supposedly, one child said "becos," the Phrygian word for bread. Psamtik concluded Phrygian was the original language.
He was almost certainly lying.
In reality, when children are isolated, they don't spontaneously speak a perfect ancient language. They struggle. However, we have seen "new" languages born in modern times. Nicaraguan Sign Language is the best example. In the 1970s, deaf children in Nicaragua were brought together in a school for the first time. They weren't taught a formal sign language. Instead, they combined their individual "home signs" and, within a generation, the kids had created a brand new language with its own grammar and rules.
This tells us that the "first language" wasn't something one person invented. It was something that happened the moment a group of humans needed to cooperate.
Why we will never truly know
The deeper you go, the more you realize that "language" is a moving target. Was a proto-human making a specific hoot to warn about a leopard "speaking"? Most linguists say no. It’s just a signal. Language requires recursion—the ability to put thoughts inside other thoughts.
"I think that he knows that I'm hungry."
👉 See also: The December 21 Winter Solstice: Why it feels so weird and what's actually happening
That complexity is what separates us from chimps. And that complexity doesn't leave a trace. We can look at the "hyoid bone" in the throat of ancient skeletons. Neandertals had them. Homo heidelbergensis had them. This suggests they could speak. But were they speaking a "first language" or just making complex noises?
The African Root
Almost all evidence points back to Africa. Just as Africa has the highest genetic diversity, it also has the highest linguistic diversity. The "click" languages (Khoisan) are some of the oldest lineages of speech we can find. Some researchers suggest the first language might have used these click sounds because they are incredibly distinct and carry well over long distances. If you want to hear a ghost of the first language, listen to the San people of the Kalahari. It's not the "first" language—it has evolved for 200,000 years just like ours—but it might retain some of the original "flavor."
Actionable insights for the curious
If you’re trying to wrap your head around the origins of human speech, don't look for a single "Eden" language. Instead, look at the patterns that exist today.
- Study Historical Linguistics: Look into the Indo-European language tree. It won't give you the first language, but it shows you how one language (Proto-Indo-European) turned into Spanish, English, Russian, and Hindi over 6,000 years. It’s a microcosm of how the first language must have split.
- Acknowledge the Gap: Accept that there is a "Pre-Symbolic" gap. Humans were physically "us" for a long time before we were culturally "us."
- Watch for New Discoveries: Keep an eye on the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. They are the ones doing the heavy lifting with ancient DNA and skull 3D-modeling that might eventually tell us exactly when our throats became capable of speech.
- Ignore the "Listicles": If a site tells you "The 5 Oldest Languages," they are talking about written history. Tamil, Hebrew, and Basque are old, but they are babies compared to the actual first language spoken by our ancestors in the savannah.
The search for what was first language is essentially the search for what makes us human. We are the "talking ape." We started talking because we had to survive, we had to cooperate, and quite frankly, we probably just had a lot of gossip to share. While the specific words are lost to the wind, the fact that we're still talking about it 200,000 years later says everything you need to know about our species.