People usually come to this topic with their minds already made up. It's tough. You’ve likely heard the same five or six verses cited in every heated Facebook comment section or Sunday morning sermon. But if you actually sit down and look at the text—I mean really look at it—the picture is a lot more complex than a simple "yes" or "no." Understanding what the Bible says about homosexuality and lesbianism requires looking at ancient languages, historical context, and the very specific ways people lived thousands of years ago.
The Bible doesn't mention "sexual orientation" as we understand it today. That's a modern psychological concept. Back then, it was all about actions.
The Old Testament and the Holiness Code
Most conversations start with Leviticus. It’s the "Law." Specifically, Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 are the heavy hitters. These verses describe male-male sexual acts as an "abomination" (to'evah in Hebrew).
Now, here is where it gets interesting. That word to'evah isn't always about moral "evil" in the way we think of it today. It often refers to ritual impurity or things that distinguished Israel from their pagan neighbors. Think of it as a cultural boundary. For instance, eating pork was also off-limits.
Some scholars, like Dr. Robert Gagnon, argue these prohibitions are absolute and rooted in the creation narrative of Genesis. He points out that the "complementarity" of male and female is a recurring theme. On the flip side, theologians like Dr. James Brownson suggest these laws were specific to an ancient Near Eastern context where such acts were often linked to temple prostitution or exploitative power dynamics. It wasn't about two consenting adults in a committed relationship. It was about something else entirely.
The Sodom Misconception
We have to talk about Sodom. For centuries, people assumed the sin of Sodom was strictly homosexuality. That’s where we get the word "sodomy."
But look at Ezekiel 16:49. It’s right there in the text. "Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy."
📖 Related: Bates Nut Farm Woods Valley Road Valley Center CA: Why Everyone Still Goes After 100 Years
The "sin" was a lack of hospitality and social injustice. While Genesis 19 describes an attempted gang rape—which is obviously horrific—many modern interpreters argue that using this story to condemn all same-sex relationships is a bit of a stretch. It’s like using a story about a bank robbery to argue that all currency is evil.
What About Lesbianism in the Bible?
This is the part that often gets skipped. Why? Because the Bible is overwhelmingly focused on male behavior. In a patriarchal society, male "seed" was seen as the primary carrier of life, so wasting it or "acting like a woman" was seen as a massive social taboo.
Lesbianism is actually only mentioned once in the entire Bible.
Romans 1:26-27 is the spot. Paul writes about women exchanging "natural relations for unnatural ones." This is the only explicit reference to female same-sex activity.
Scholars like Bernadette Brooten have spent years analyzing this. In her book Love Between Women, she argues that Paul was viewing this through the lens of Roman and Greek culture, where such acts were often seen as "excessive" or breaking the "natural" hierarchy of the time. But again, did Paul have a concept of two women in a lifelong, loving, egalitarian marriage? Probably not. He was likely reacting to the wild, often coercive sexual climate of the Roman Empire.
Paul’s "Clutter" Words: Arsenokoitai and Malakoi
When you get into the New Testament, specifically 1 Corinthians 6:9 and 1 Timothy 1:10, you run into some linguistic puzzles. Paul uses two specific Greek words: malakoi and arsenokoitai.
👉 See also: Why T. Pepin’s Hospitality Centre Still Dominates the Tampa Event Scene
Translating these is a nightmare.
- Malakoi: Literally means "soft." In some older Bibles, it’s translated as "effeminate." In others, "male prostitutes."
- Arsenokoitai: This is a compound word Paul might have actually invented. Arsen (male) and koite (bed).
Because these words are so rare, we have to look at how they were used in other Greek literature. Some think Paul was referencing the Levitical laws directly. Others, like Dr. David Gushee, suggest these terms referred to pederasty (men with boys) or economic sexual exploitation common in the Greco-Roman world.
The debate is fierce. If Paul was condemning pederasty, then the verses don't necessarily apply to modern committed couples. If he was condemning the very act of two men being together, then they do. There isn't a consensus, and honestly, anyone who tells you there is a 100% "certain" translation is probably ignoring a lot of academic footnotes.
The Silence of Jesus
It’s worth noting that Jesus never explicitly mentions homosexuality or lesbianism. Not once.
He talks a lot about divorce. He talks a lot about adultery. He talks a massive amount about money and how it ruins people. Some argue his silence means he didn't see it as a primary concern. Others point out that as a Jewish rabbi, he would have naturally upheld the Levitical laws of his time.
He did, however, redefine "family." In Matthew 12, he says his mother and brothers are those who do the will of God. He consistently pushed people toward a radical kind of love that transcended traditional biological or social structures. Whether that includes same-sex unions is the question that has split modern denominations right down the middle.
✨ Don't miss: Human DNA Found in Hot Dogs: What Really Happened and Why You Shouldn’t Panic
Navigating the Different Viewpoints
Today, you’ll find three main "camps" on this.
Side A (Affirming)
These folks believe that the Bible, when understood in its original context, does not condemn loving, committed same-sex relationships. They view the "clobber passages" as being about rape, prostitution, or idolatry.
Side B (Non-Affirming but Supportive)
This group believes the Bible prohibits same-sex sexual activity but welcomes LGBTQ+ individuals into the church, often calling for a life of celibacy. They believe the "traditional" view of marriage is a core theological pillar.
Side X (Non-Affirming and Restrictive)
This is the more traditional, often fundamentalist view that sees any same-sex attraction or behavior as a sin that must be repented of and "changed."
Moving Beyond the Debate
If you're trying to figure out what this means for your own life or your faith, don't just take a snippet of a verse from a meme.
Read the texts in a variety of translations (NRSV, NIV, NASB). Look at the historical context of the Roman Empire and ancient Israel. Most importantly, look at the "fruit" of these interpretations. How do they affect real people?
Practical Steps for Further Study
- Read the "Clobber Passages" in Context: Don't just read the verse. Read the three chapters before it and the three chapters after it. Who is the author talking to? What is the main problem they are trying to solve?
- Check the Greek and Hebrew: Use a tool like a Blue Letter Bible or a Strong’s Concordance to see how the words were used elsewhere. You don't need to be a scholar to see the patterns.
- Listen to Different Voices: Read a book by a conservative scholar like N.T. Wright and then read something by a progressive scholar like Justin Lee or Matthew Vines.
- Focus on the Core Commandments: Remember that for Jesus, the greatest commandments were to love God and love your neighbor. Any interpretation of scripture that leads to hatred or dehumanization is usually missing the mark of the Gospel's broader message.
Scripture is a living thing. It's meant to be wrestled with, not just used as a weapon. Whether you find clarity or more questions, the goal is to seek truth with a heavy dose of humility.