Ever watch a marathon and see the lead pack of men finish while the women come in ten or twelve minutes later? It’s the standard script. We’re taught that in the world of sweat and grit, men hold the keys to the castle because of testosterone and bigger lungs. But that's a narrow way of looking at it. Honestly, if you change the rules of the game—if you make the race longer, colder, or more about precision than "hulking out"—the script flips.
The question of what sports are women better at isn't about some "girl power" slogan. It's actually a fascinating deep dive into metabolic efficiency and extreme fatigue resistance. Science is finally catching up to what many of us suspected: women are basically built for the long haul.
The Ultra-Endurance Shift
When a race is 26 miles, men win. When it’s 50 miles, men usually still win. But once you start pushing past the 195-mile mark, things get weird.
Take Courtney Dauwalter. In 2017, she didn't just win the Moab 240—a 238-mile footrace through Utah. She destroyed it. She finished more than 10 hours ahead of the first man. Ten hours. That's not a fluke; it's a biological signal.
Women's muscles are often composed of more Type I (slow-twitch) fibers. These aren't for sprinting; they’re for not quitting. Men burn through glycogen—the "rocket fuel" of the body—way faster. Women are remarkably efficient at tapping into fat stores. When a man "hits the wall" because his sugar runs out, a woman is often just getting into her groove.
🔗 Read more: Why Funny Fantasy Football Names Actually Win Leagues
Why the Gap Shrinks at Distance
- Metabolic Flexibility: Estrogen helps women metabolize fat more effectively than men during exercise.
- Pacing Mastery: Data from thousands of marathon runners shows women are significantly better at keeping a steady pace, while men tend to go out too fast and blow up.
- Muscle Preservation: Studies suggest women’s muscles may suffer less damage over multi-day efforts compared to men’s more explosive, easily-teared muscle fibers.
Water is the Great Equalizer
If you want to see where the physical gap actually disappears, look at open-water swimming. This is one of the few areas where what sports are women better at becomes a literal "look at the record books" moment.
For years, the world record for swimming the English Channel was held by a woman (Penny Dean, then later others). In the 46-kilometer Manhattan Island Marathon Swim, the top women have consistently clocked times 12% to 14% faster than the top men.
Why? Buoyancy and insulation.
Women naturally have a higher body fat percentage. In a gym, that’s a "stat." In the 60-degree water of the North Atlantic, it’s a superpower. Fat provides better natural buoyancy, meaning women don't have to spend as much energy just staying afloat. It also acts as a wetsuit. While a lean male swimmer is fighting hypothermia, a woman’s body is better equipped to keep its core temperature stable.
💡 You might also like: Heisman Trophy Nominees 2024: The Year the System Almost Broke
Precision and the "Steady Hand"
Now, move away from the "grind" and look at sports that require absolute stillness. Shooting and archery are prime examples.
In these disciplines, the biggest enemy isn't an opponent; it's your own heartbeat. Because women generally have a lower center of gravity and a different ratio of muscle-to-total-mass in the upper body, they can sometimes achieve a level of postural stability that men struggle with.
For a long time, shooting was one of the few Olympic sports where men and women competed directly against each other. In 1992, Zhang Shan won the gold medal in skeet shooting, beating every man on the field. The Olympic committee actually changed the rules after that to separate the genders, which some argue was to protect the "prestige" of male competitors.
The Equestrian Exception
Equestrian sports are unique. It’s the only Olympic sport where men and women compete on the exact same terms, at the exact same time, for the exact same medals. There is no "Women's Dressage." It’s just Dressage.
📖 Related: When Was the MLS Founded? The Chaotic Truth About American Soccer's Rebirth
While men still dominate the very top of the rankings due to historical funding and sponsorship access, the actual performance data shows no inherent male advantage. In fact, many experts argue women have a slight edge in "feel" and communication with the horse. Since the sport isn't about overpowering a 1,200-pound animal (which is impossible anyway), the focus is on subtle cues and balance.
Acknowledging the Complexity
We have to be real here: the "men are faster/stronger" argument holds up in about 90% of traditional sports. If the game is about 100-meter sprints, vertical jumps, or bench pressing, the male physiology (thanks to that puberty-induced testosterone surge) usually wins out.
But "better" is a relative term.
If the definition of "better" is "who can survive 300 miles in the desert" or "who can swim 30 miles in freezing water," the answer shifts. We’re moving into an era where we realize that "strength" isn't just about how much weight you can move once. It's about how much you can endure for the fiftieth hour in a row.
Key Insights for the Future
- Focus on Ultra-Distances: If you’re a female athlete looking to compete on an even playing field with men, look at events that take 48+ hours.
- Pacing is a Skill: Use the natural biological advantage of steady pacing to beat male competitors who are prone to "ego-racing" in the first half of an event.
- Body Composition is a Tool: Stop viewing higher body fat as a hindrance; in swimming and cold-weather endurance, it is your primary competitive advantage.
The real takeaway is that the "weaker sex" label was always a bit of a scam based on sports designed specifically for male traits. When you design a sport for the human body's ultimate limit, women aren't just participating—they're often leading the pack.
To see this in action, track the results of the next Backyard Ultra or the Transcontinental Race. You’ll notice the names at the top of the overall leaderboard aren't always who you'd expect. The data is clear: the longer the game, the better the odds for women.