It was late May 2024 when the news cycle basically exploded. You probably remember the alerts hitting your phone. After weeks of testimony involving a porn star, a tabloid king, and a "fixer" turned star witness, a New York jury did something that had never happened in American history. They found a former president—Donald Trump—guilty on every single charge they were weighing.
The specific phrase trump guilty on all 34 counts became the headline of the decade. But honestly, even though everyone saw the headlines, a lot of people are still kinda fuzzy on what those 34 counts actually were. It wasn't just one "crime." It was a stack of paper trail entries that prosecutors said added up to a massive conspiracy to hide information from voters back in 2016.
The 34 Counts Explained (Simply)
So, why 34? It sounds like a lot, right? Like he must have committed 34 different heists. In reality, it was about the bookkeeping. New York law treats every single false entry in a business record as a separate crime.
Basically, the prosecution had to prove that Trump falsified records to hide a $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels. Because that payment was repaid to Michael Cohen over many months, the paper trail was long.
Each count represented a specific document:
🔗 Read more: Lake Nyos Cameroon 1986: What Really Happened During the Silent Killer’s Release
- 11 invoices from Michael Cohen.
- 11 checks signed by Trump or his trust.
- 12 ledger entries in the Trump Organization's books.
Add those up and you get 34. To make it a felony, Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg had to prove Trump didn't just mess up his taxes—he did it to cover up another crime. That "other crime" was a violation of New York Election Law Section 17-152, which makes it a conspiracy to promote an election by "unlawful means."
Why the Trial Felt So Different
If you watched any of the coverage, the vibe was surreal. You had Stormy Daniels testifying about a hotel room encounter in 2006. Then you had David Pecker, the former head of the National Enquirer, explaining "catch and kill" schemes where he’d buy embarrassing stories just to bury them.
The star witness, Michael Cohen, was the real lightning rod. He’s the guy who actually paid the money. The defense tried to paint him as a serial liar who just wanted revenge. Honestly, it almost worked. But the prosecution relied on "the receipts"—literally. They had the checks. They had the handwritten notes from Allen Weisselberg, the Trump Org's CFO, showing exactly how the $130,000 was "grossed up" to $420,000 to cover taxes and a bonus.
The jury didn't need to love Michael Cohen. They just had to believe the documents he was explaining.
💡 You might also like: Why Fox Has a Problem: The Identity Crisis at the Top of Cable News
The Sentence and the "President-Elect" Twist
For months after the verdict, everyone was guessing. Would he go to jail? Would he get probation? Judge Juan Merchan had a massive decision to make. Initially, sentencing was set for July 2024. Then it moved to September. Then the Supreme Court dropped a bombshell ruling on presidential immunity, which complicated everything.
Then, Trump won the 2024 election.
That changed the math for the court system entirely. On January 10, 2025—just ten days before he was sworn in for a second term—Judge Merchan handed down a sentence of "unconditional discharge."
"The only lawful sentence that permits entry of a judgment of conviction without encroaching on the highest office in the land is an unconditional discharge," Merchan stated in court.
📖 Related: The CIA Stars on the Wall: What the Memorial Really Represents
In plain English? It means he was convicted, and the felony stays on his record for now, but he doesn't have to go to jail, pay a fine, or report to a probation officer. It was a weird, middle-ground ending to a case that was anything but ordinary.
What Most People Get Wrong About the Conviction
One huge misconception is that this conviction barred him from being president. It didn't. The U.S. Constitution has very few requirements for the presidency: you have to be at least 35, a natural-born citizen, and have lived in the U.S. for 14 years. It says nothing about a criminal record.
Another thing people miss is the appeal status. Just because he was sentenced doesn't mean it's over. Trump’s legal team is currently fighting to have the whole thing tossed out in the New York appellate courts. They’re arguing that because some evidence used in the trial (like tweets and testimony about his time in the White House) involved "official acts," the conviction should be voided under the Supreme Court's immunity ruling.
The Practical Reality Moving Forward
If you're trying to make sense of where this stands today, here are the three things you need to know:
- The Record Remains: As of right now, Donald Trump is a convicted felon. That shows up on background checks. If he weren't the president, he’d technically be barred from owning a firearm or traveling to certain countries like Canada or the UK without special waivers.
- The Federal Case Factor: While this was a state case in New York, it set the tone for how legal battles intersect with politics. Because it’s a state conviction, he cannot pardon himself for it. Only the Governor of New York (currently Kathy Hochul) has that power.
- The Precedent: This case proved that a former president can be tried and convicted by a jury of regular citizens. Whether you think it was a "witch hunt" or "justice served," the legal precedent is now part of American history forever.
If you’re following the appeals, keep an eye on the New York Court of Appeals. That’s where the real fight is happening now. They have to decide if Judge Merchan’s decision to allow certain evidence was a "harmless error" or something that fundamentally broke the trial's fairness.
Actionable Next Steps for Staying Informed
- Check the New York Unified Court System website for official filings on the appeal status; these are public documents and provide the most accurate updates.
- Review the Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. United States to understand why the "official acts" argument is the primary weapon the defense is using to try and overturn the 34 counts.
- Differentiate between state and federal charges. Remember that this Manhattan case is entirely separate from the federal cases brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith, which were largely dropped or paused following the 2024 election results.