It was 2008. The App Store was basically the Wild West, and Armin Heinrich was about to pull off the ultimate digital stunt. He created the I Am Rich application. It didn't do anything. Literally nothing. If you opened it, you just saw a glowing red gem and a mantra that popped up in large text.
"I am rich, I deserv it, I am good, healthy & successful."
Yes, "deserv" was misspelled.
People lost their minds. Not because of the typo, but because the app cost $999.99. Back then, that was the absolute maximum price Apple allowed in the App Store. It was the digital equivalent of a gold-plated paperweight, a pure flex designed for people who had more money than they knew what to do with. Eight people actually bought it. Eight.
The App That Defined Digital Status
The I Am Rich application wasn't trying to solve a problem. It wasn't a productivity tool or a game. It was a social experiment masquerading as software. Armin Heinrich, a German developer, basically wanted to see if the prestige of "owning" something expensive would translate to the digital world.
He found out pretty quickly.
💡 You might also like: How to Download and Install macOS Without Losing Your Mind or Your Data
Six of the buyers were in the US, and two were in Europe. One of those buyers allegedly claimed he bought it by accident and was "appalled" when he saw the charge. Apple pulled the app from the store less than 24 hours after it went live. No explanation. No press release. Just poof. It was gone.
Why the $999.99 Price Tag Mattered
In the early days of the iPhone, $0.99 was the standard. Maybe you’d splurge $4.99 on a high-end game. Dropping a thousand dollars on a red JPEG was unheard of. It challenged the very idea of what an "app" was supposed to be.
Was it art? Was it a scam? Or was it just a very expensive joke?
Honestly, it was a bit of all three. By setting the price at the hard ceiling of the App Store’s limit, Heinrich ensured that his creation would get more press than any functional app ever could. You couldn't buy that kind of marketing. The I Am Rich application became a global news story overnight because it highlighted our weird obsession with status symbols, even when those symbols don't actually exist in the physical world.
The Fallout and the "Copycat" Era
After Apple nuked the original, the vacuum didn't stay empty for long. Since the I Am Rich application proved there was a weird, niche market for "prestige apps," other developers tried to get in on the action.
💡 You might also like: Black Friday GoPro Deals: Why You Should Probably Wait (or Not)
The Android Market (which we now call Google Play) saw a wave of "I Am Rich" clones. Some were cheap parodies for $0.99. Others tried to hit that $200 mark. But the magic—if you can call it that—was gone. The original worked because it was the first time we realized that the App Store could be used for something other than utility.
Apple’s decision to remove it remains a point of contention among tech historians. On one hand, the app didn't violate any explicit rules at the time. It did exactly what it said it would do: show a gem and prove you were rich enough to buy it. On the other hand, Apple has always been protective of its "user experience." Having a thousand-dollar "nothing" app on the front page of the charts didn't exactly scream "premium ecosystem."
Legal and Ethical Grays
Did Armin Heinrich do anything wrong? Probably not. He was transparent about what the app did. He didn't promise it would cure cancer or manage your stocks. He promised a gem. He delivered a gem.
The controversy really stems from the "accidental" purchase. If a kid gets ahold of a parent's unlocked iPhone and taps "Buy" on a $1 app, it's an annoyance. If they do it on the I Am Rich application, it’s a financial crisis for some families. This specific incident likely pushed Apple toward more rigorous confirmation screens and eventually the biometric "Double Click to Pay" systems we use today.
Modern Successors: Is Digital Flexing Still a Thing?
If you look at the world of NFTs and digital collectibles today, the I Am Rich application looks like a prophet. Buying a Bored Ape for $200,000 isn't that different from buying a glowing red gem for $1,000. Both are about proving ownership within a specific digital ledger.
We’ve moved from apps to blockchain, but the psychology is identical.
- Veblen Goods: These are items where demand increases as the price increases because they are status symbols. The I Am Rich application was the ultimate digital Veblen good.
- The "Rich" Badge: Even today, you’ll find "VIP" versions of apps or "Gold" tiers that offer almost no functional benefit over the free version. People still pay for the badge.
- The Rarity Factor: Because the original was only live for a day, the iPhones that still have it installed are technically collectors' items.
The Technical Reality of the 2008 iPhone
You have to remember how limited the iPhone 3G was. There was no multitasking. No folders. No copy-paste. In that environment, an app that just displayed a single image wasn't actually that much "thinner" than the rest of the ecosystem. Most apps were single-purpose utilities.
Heinrich’s code was incredibly simple. It was basically a UIImageView and a bit of text.
The real "code" was the price tag. That was the feature.
When we talk about the I Am Rich application, we're really talking about the moment the tech world realized that software could be a luxury brand. It paved the way for "Pro" versions of everything. It made us realize that the digital store was a marketplace for ego, not just tools.
What Developers Learned
Actually, many developers learned that Apple is the ultimate gatekeeper. You can build whatever you want, but if it makes the platform look bad, it’s gone. This "editorial" control is why the App Store feels different from the open web.
Heinrich eventually released "I Am Rich LE" (Limited Edition). It cost $9.99 and actually included some features like a calculator and a "help" file. It was a sarcastic nod to the critics who said his first app lacked utility. It didn't have the same impact. The original was a lightning strike of absurdity that can't be replicated.
Impact on App Store Policy
Shortly after the I Am Rich application debacle, Apple started getting way more specific about "Minimum Functionality" in their Review Guidelines.
Today, if you submit an app that just shows a picture, it will be rejected under Guideline 4.2: "Your app should include features, content, and UI that elevate it beyond a repackaged website." Apple essentially outlawed the "joke app" at high price points to protect the integrity of the store.
The Human Element
I've often wondered about those eight people. Who were they? Were they bored billionaires? Tech journalists trying to get a scoop? Or just people who hit the wrong button?
✨ Don't miss: Sea Power: Naval Combat in the Missile Age and Why the Rules Have Changed
We know at least one was a person who genuinely wanted the status. They saw the price not as a barrier, but as the point. In a world where we spend thousands on "skins" in Fortnite or "land" in a metaverse, the I Am Rich application doesn't seem like an outlier anymore. It seems like the starting line.
Actionable Insights for the Digital Age
If you're looking back at this piece of tech history, there are a few practical takeaways regarding digital security and consumer behavior.
- Audit Your Subscriptions: The "accidental purchase" that killed the I Am Rich app is still a major issue today. Go into your iPhone settings, tap your name, and check "Subscriptions." You might be paying for your own version of a "useless gem" every month.
- Set Up Purchase Restrictions: If you have kids, go to "Screen Time" > "Content & Privacy Restrictions" > "iTunes & App Store Purchases." Set "Require Password" to "Always" and consider turning off In-App Purchases entirely.
- Value vs. Price: Before buying a "Premium" or "Pro" version of an app, ask if you're paying for a feature you’ll actually use, or if you're just buying the digital equivalent of that glowing red gem.
- Preserve Old Tech: If you happen to have an old iPhone 3G sitting in a drawer with "extinct" apps on it, don't wipe it. Devices with deleted apps (like Flappy Bird or the original I Am Rich) occasionally hold value for tech collectors.
The I Am Rich application was a moment in time where the absurdity of the internet met the cold reality of the banking system. It remains the most honest app ever made: it promised to make you poorer to prove you were rich, and it did exactly that.