The internet can be a dark place. Honestly, if you’ve been following the meteoric rise of Indiana Fever star Caitlin Clark, you’ve likely seen the headlines about a supposed "Caitlin Clark naked video" floating around social media. It's a heavy topic. It’s also a lie.
What we’re actually seeing isn’t a leaked personal moment or a scandalous clip from a locker room. Instead, it’s a high-profile example of how AI is being weaponized against women in sports. In mid-2025, a video began circulating on X (formerly Twitter) that appeared to show Clark in an explicit situation. It looked real at first glance. It had millions of views within hours. But as experts quickly pointed out, the footage was a total digital forgery—a deepfake.
The original video actually came from a harmless clip of Clark at a Pacers game, waving to fans and smiling with children. Some anonymous creator took that footage and used "nudify" AI tools to alter the second half of the clip. It was a targeted digital assault.
The Reality of the Caitlin Clark Naked Video Deepfakes
This isn't just about one athlete. It’s a trend that’s hitting the WNBA hard. While Clark is the most visible target because of her "Caitlin Clark Effect" on ratings, she’s not alone. Angel Reese and Cameron Brink have dealt with the exact same garbage. Reese even took to social media to call it "crazy and weird AF," which is probably the most honest way to describe it.
🔗 Read more: Texas Tech Red Raiders Basketball Schedule: The Big 12 Gauntlet Explained
People search for these videos thinking they’ve found some "lost" content, but they’re actually walking into a trap of misinformation. The tech has gotten scary good. By early 2026, generative AI models like Grok and various third-party apps have made it so easy to create these fakes that the internet is basically flooded with them.
The problem is the speed of the spread.
When that Clark deepfake hit in 2025, it racked up nearly 10 million views. Compare that to the original, real video of her at the game, which only had about 330,000 views. The fake news was literally 30 times more popular than the truth. That’s the uphill battle athletes are fighting right now.
Why Platforms Struggle to Stop It
You’d think a giant company would just hit a "delete" button, right? Well, it’s not that simple. Platforms like X have gutted their trust and safety teams over the last two years. When users reported the Caitlin Clark deepfake, many received automated messages saying the content didn't violate sensitive media rules.
📖 Related: Dallas Cowboys Score Quarter-by-Quarter: The Truth About That Weird Season
It’s frustrating.
It wasn't until Community Notes—the user-led fact-checking system—stepped in that the video was labeled as a non-consensual AI forgery. Even then, the damage was done. The video lived in the "For You" feeds of millions before it was finally throttled.
Legal Consequences Are Finally Catching Up
If there is a silver lining, it’s that the law is finally growing some teeth. In May 2025, the U.S. passed the TAKE IT DOWN Act. This was a massive deal. It’s the first federal law that actually criminalizes the distribution of non-consensual AI-generated intimate imagery.
Here is what that means in plain English:
- Sharing or creating these deepfakes can now lead to up to two years in federal prison.
- Platforms are legally required to pull flagged content within 48 hours.
- Victims can sue for massive statutory damages—sometimes up to $250,000 per incident.
States like Pennsylvania and Washington also passed their own laws in late 2025, classifying the creation of these "forged digital likenesses" as misdemeanors or even felonies. The "wild west" era of AI is starting to close, but for stars like Clark, the harassment is a daily tax on their fame.
Staying Safe in a Deepfake World
So, what do you do if you see something suspicious? Kinda simple: don't click and definitely don't share. Every click feeds the algorithm that pushes that content to more people.
📖 Related: Oregon Football Civil War: What Most People Get Wrong
Caitlin Clark herself has been pretty vocal about how she handles the noise. She basically views social media as a "false perception of reality." She’s right. To stay grounded, she focuses on the fans she sees in person—the little kids at the arenas who actually care about her jumper, not some weird AI-generated clip.
Teams are also stepping up. The Chicago Sky recently became the first WNBA team to hire professional digital security firms to monitor and report threats against their players. They use tech from companies like Moonshot to track down the people making these fakes and hand their info to the FBI.
How to Spot the Fakes
If you find yourself looking at a video and wondering if it's legit, look for the "glitches."
- The Eyes: AI still struggles with realistic blinking or eye movement that matches the head's turn.
- The Skin: Does the skin look too smooth? Real people have pores, moles, and sweat, especially athletes.
- The Background: Often, the area around the person's hair or neck will look blurry or "shimmer" when they move.
Most of these videos are created by people who aren't tech geniuses; they’re just using cheap apps. They leave tracks.
What's Next for Digital Safety?
We’re at a turning point. As we move through 2026, expect to see more "watermarking" on real content. Platforms are testing tech that proves a video actually came from a verified camera.
The conversation around the Caitlin Clark naked video isn't really about a video at all—it's about consent and the right to own your own face in a digital world. Clark is the face of a new era of basketball, and unfortunately, she’s also the face of the fight against AI-driven harassment.
The Bottom Line:
If you see a link promising "leaked" or "naked" footage of Caitlin Clark, it is a scam, a deepfake, or malware. There is no such video.
To help stop the spread of this harmful content, your best move is to report the post immediately under "non-consensual sexual imagery" or "harassment" on whatever platform you're using. Use the built-in reporting tools on X, Instagram, or TikTok, as these now trigger the mandatory 48-hour review window under the TAKE IT DOWN Act. If you’re a creator, avoid re-uploading even "blurred" versions to talk about the controversy, as this only increases the search volume and helps the original fakes rank higher in search results. Keep the focus on the game and the athlete's actual achievements.