Rain. It was absolutely pouring. When we talk about the Air India flight accident involving flight IX-1344 on August 7, 2020, that's the first thing everyone remembers. The monsoon in Kerala isn't just a light drizzle; it’s a heavy, blinding wall of water that turns runways into skating rinks. This wasn't just some random mechanical failure or a freak explosion. It was a complex, heartbreaking mess of environmental pressure, a notoriously difficult "tabletop" runway, and split-second human decisions that didn't go the way they needed to.
People often mix this up with the 2010 Mangalore crash. While they look eerily similar, the Kozhikode tragedy had its own specific set of failures. You've got a Boeing 737-800 coming in from Dubai, carrying 190 people who were just trying to get home during the height of the pandemic. They were part of the Vande Bharat Mission. It’s heavy stuff.
The Problem With Tabletop Runways
If you haven't seen Calicut International Airport (CCJ), it’s basically a giant plateau. A tabletop runway is exactly what it sounds like—the runway is built on a hill, and if you overshoot, there’s nowhere to go but down. It’s a literal cliff. In the case of this Air India flight accident, the plane didn't just slide; it plummeted 30-35 feet off the edge.
The plane broke in two.
Honestly, it’s a miracle the thing didn't catch fire. Most people who survived owe their lives to the fact that the fuel didn't ignite upon impact. If it had, we’d be talking about a total loss of life instead of the 21 fatalities we ended up with, including both pilots. Captain Deepak Vasant Sathe was a veteran. He was a former Indian Air Force test pilot. He knew what he was doing, which makes the final report's findings even harder to swallow for a lot of people in the aviation community.
What the Investigation Actually Found
The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) didn't mince words in their 257-page report. They pointed directly at "pilot error," specifically the non-adherence to standard operating procedures (SOP). But that’s a clinical way of saying they tried to land too far down the runway.
🔗 Read more: Lake Nyos Cameroon 1986: What Really Happened During the Silent Killer’s Release
In aviation, we talk about the "touchdown zone." You have to hit the ground within a certain distance to have enough room to stop. Because of the tailwind—which was around 15 knots, exceeding the 10-knot limit—and the standing water on the runway, the plane floated. It didn't want to settle. By the time the wheels actually stayed down, they had used up a massive chunk of the landing strip.
The co-pilot, Akhilesh Kumar, did actually shout "Go around" more than once. That’s the rule: if the landing isn't perfect, you floor the engines and try again. But for some reason, the captain continued. Maybe it was "get-there-itis," that psychological push to just finish the job after a long flight and a previous aborted landing attempt on the other end of the runway. We'll never know exactly what was going through his head in those final seconds.
The Wind and the Water
The weather was trash.
Specifically, the tailwind was a huge factor. Normally, you want to land into the wind to slow down. Landing with a tailwind is like trying to stop a car on ice while someone is pushing you from behind. The investigation highlighted that the pilots were briefed on the weather, but the changing wind patterns at Kozhikode are famously unpredictable.
- The runway was 2,700 meters long.
- The plane touched down at about 4,438 feet from the beginning of the runway.
- That left almost no room for the brakes and thrust reversers to do their job on a wet surface.
Hydroplaning is a real beast. When there’s a thin layer of water between the tires and the asphalt, the plane basically becomes a boat. You have zero steering and almost no braking power. Data from the Flight Data Recorder (FDR) showed that the braking pressure was applied, but the physics just weren't on their side anymore.
💡 You might also like: Why Fox Has a Problem: The Identity Crisis at the Top of Cable News
Why Experts Are Still Arguing About It
Not everyone agrees with the "pilot error" label being the whole story. You'll find plenty of retired pilots and safety experts who argue that the airport infrastructure itself was a ticking time bomb. The Runway End Safety Area (RESA) was technically within international standards, but many believe it wasn't sufficient for a tabletop airport prone to heavy monsoons.
Safety experts like Mohan Ranganathan had been warning about the safety risks at Kozhikode for years before the Air India flight accident occurred. He’d specifically pointed out that the "rubber deposits" on the runway hadn't been cleaned frequently enough, which reduces friction. When you combine poor friction with a tailwind and a late touchdown, you're asking for a disaster.
The AAIB report did mention that the Air Traffic Controller (ATC) didn't provide the crew with updated wind speeds right before the final moments, which might have changed their decision to land. It's a chain. Accidents are rarely just one mistake; they’re a "Swiss cheese" model where all the holes line up perfectly.
The Human Side of the Tragedy
We tend to look at charts and g-force numbers, but the local community in Malappuram deserves a massive shout-out. These people didn't wait for ambulances. Despite the fear of COVID-19 at the time, hundreds of locals rushed to the site. They pulled people out of the wreckage, used their private cars to ferry the injured to hospitals, and stood in lines at midnight to donate blood.
It was a staggering display of humanity. The rescuers found the cockpit crushed against the perimeter wall. The fuselage had snapped, but the passengers in the middle and rear sections had a much higher survival rate because the plane didn't burn.
📖 Related: The CIA Stars on the Wall: What the Memorial Really Represents
Moving Forward: Changes in Indian Aviation
Because of this specific Air India flight accident, things have actually changed. It’s not just paperwork. The DGCA (Directorate General of Civil Aviation) tightened the screws on tabletop runway operations.
- Stricter Training: Pilots now undergo much more rigorous simulator training specifically for "unstable approaches" and tailwind landings on short runways.
- Infrastructure Upgrades: There has been a massive push to expand the RESA at airports like Mangalore and Kozhikode.
- Technology: More advanced weather monitoring systems have been installed to give pilots real-time data on runway surface conditions.
Basically, the industry had to admit that "good enough" wasn't good enough when lives were on the line. They've also started looking at "EMAS" (Engineered Materials Arresting System), which is basically a bed of crushable concrete at the end of a runway that stops a plane safely if it overshoots. It’s expensive, but cheaper than a hull loss and the loss of life.
Understanding the Risks Today
Is it safe to fly into these airports now? Generally, yes. The oversight is night and day compared to 2020. However, the Kozhikode crash serves as a permanent reminder that in aviation, complacency is the enemy. You can't negotiate with a monsoon.
If you're looking at this from a passenger's perspective, there isn't much you can do about the runway or the wind. But understanding that these accidents are the result of systemic failures helps push for better safety standards. We shouldn't just blame the guys in the cockpit and move on. We have to look at the ATC, the airport maintenance, and the corporate culture that puts pressure on on-time arrivals.
Practical Steps for Safety Awareness
For those who travel frequently or are interested in aviation safety, here is how to stay informed and what to actually look for regarding flight safety:
- Check the METAR: If you’re a nerd for data, you can check real-time weather reports (METAR) for your destination. If you see "Heavy RA" (Rain) and "TS" (Thunderstorms) with high tailwinds, expect delays or diversions. Diversions are actually a sign of a good pilot, not a bad one.
- Follow the AAIB and NTSB: If you want the truth about an accident, read the final reports. They are public. Don't rely on 24-hour news cycles that often guess about "engine failure" before the black boxes are even found.
- Support EMAS Implementation: Advocacy for better airport infrastructure, like Engineered Materials Arresting Systems, is the only way to truly "accident-proof" tabletop runways.
- Pay Attention to the Briefing: It sounds cliché, but in a crash where the plane breaks apart, knowing exactly where the nearest exit is (count the rows!) determines whether you get out in 90 seconds or not.
The Air India flight accident at Kozhikode was a dark day, but the lessons learned are literally written in blood. They are the reason the next flight landing in a storm will likely choose to divert to a safer airport rather than pushing the limits of a tabletop cliff. It’s a harsh way to learn, but in the sky, it's the only way things actually get better.