What Really Happened With How California Voted in 2024

What Really Happened With How California Voted in 2024

California is usually a predictable blue wall. You know how the story goes: the Democrat wins by a landslide, the GOP complains about "liberal insanity," and everyone moves on. But honestly, if you look at the raw data from the 2024 cycle, the "Golden State" isn't looking quite as gold for the Democratic establishment as it used to.

Kamala Harris did win the state, obviously. She secured 58.5% of the vote compared to Donald Trump's 38.3%. But here is the thing that basically everyone is talking about: that 20-point margin is actually a massive shrink from 2020. Back then, Joe Biden carried California by nearly 30 points. You don't lose 10% of your cushion in four years without some serious internal shifts happening under the surface.

So, how did California vote 2024? It wasn't a "flip," but it was a correction. From the gas pumps in the Central Valley to the grocery aisles in San Bernardino, the vibes were different this time around.

The "Red Shift" in the Blue Fortress

It’s kinda wild to think that Trump actually increased his share of the vote in 45 out of 54 counties. This wasn't just a rural thing. We saw it in places like Riverside and San Bernardino, which actually flipped to the Republican side of the ledger. Even in deep-blue Orange County, the margin narrowed significantly.

What drove this? Honestly, it was the economy. People are frustrated. You've got some of the highest utility bills and gas prices in the nation, and that hits hard when you're trying to raise a family. National exit polls—and the local data we have—suggest that Latino and Asian American voters moved toward the GOP at rates that have Democratic strategists sweating.

💡 You might also like: Robert Hanssen: What Most People Get Wrong About the FBI's Most Damaging Spy

  • Riverside County: Flipped Red (R+1)
  • San Bernardino County: Flipped Red (R+2)
  • Orange County: Stayed Blue, but barely (D+3)

The Turnout Problem

The biggest shocker? Millions of people just stayed home. 2020 was a high-water mark for engagement because of the pandemic and the high-stakes drama, but 2024 saw a drop-off of more than a million voters.

A study from USC’s Price School of Public Policy showed that nearly 16% of registered Democrats who voted in 2020 didn't bother to cast a ballot this time. Republicans had a drop-off too, but it was smaller. When your base doesn't show up, the "landslide" starts to look more like a "mudslide."

The Senate Race: Adam Schiff’s Historic Win

While the presidential race felt like a tightening, the Senate race was a different beast. Adam Schiff basically cruised into the seat formerly held by the legendary Dianne Feinstein. He defeated Steve Garvey, the former Dodgers star, with 58.9% of the vote.

Schiff actually set a record. He received over 9 million votes, the most for any Senate candidate in U.S. history. He played it smart by spending big in the primary to ensure he faced a Republican in the general, rather than a fellow Democrat like Katie Porter. It was a tactical masterclass that basically guaranteed his victory before the first general election ballot was even mailed.

📖 Related: Why the Recent Snowfall Western New York State Emergency Was Different

Prop 36: A Massive U-Turn on Crime

If you want to know the "vibe" of California right now, look no further than Proposition 36. This wasn't just a win; it was a blowout. About 68% of voters said "Yes" to increasing penalties for certain theft and drug crimes.

This basically rolls back some of the 2014 reforms (Prop 47) that people feel went too far. Voters were tired of the "smash-and-grab" videos on their newsfeeds. They were tired of open-air drug use. Even in liberal San Francisco and Los Angeles, people voted for a "tougher" approach.

"Voters issued a stunning rejection of the current broken political system," says Carl DeMaio, a prominent reform advocate in the state.

It turns out that even in a progressive state, there’s a limit to how much disorder people will tolerate before they demand a change in the rules.

👉 See also: Nate Silver Trump Approval Rating: Why the 2026 Numbers Look So Different

The Congressional Battlefield

California also held the keys to the House of Representatives. Several races were so close they took weeks to call.

  1. District 13: John Duarte (R) and Adam Gray (D) were neck-and-neck, with the race ultimately being a razor-thin margin for the Democrat.
  2. District 45: Derek Tran managed to unseat incumbent Michelle Steel in a race defined by the Vietnamese-American vote in Orange County.
  3. District 27: George Whitesides flipped Mike Garcia’s seat, proving that the suburbs of LA are still very much in play.

What it Means for the Future

The 2024 results suggest California is entering a "correction phase." People aren't necessarily becoming Republicans overnight, but they are becoming skeptical. They want solutions for the cost of living and public safety that go beyond partisan talking points.

If you're looking to understand the political climate in California for the 2026 midterms, keep an eye on these three areas:

  • Cost of Living Initiatives: Expect more measures focused on utility rates and housing costs.
  • Voter ID Debates: A movement for voter ID at the local level is already gaining signatures for the 2026 ballot.
  • The "Moderate" Democrat Rise: Candidates who distance themselves from the far-left on crime and spending will likely have the easiest path to victory.

The 2024 vote proves that no state is truly "set in stone." Even in California, the political ground is shifting under our feet.

Actionable Insights for California Residents:

  • Check your voter registration status now at the California Secretary of State website to ensure you're ready for the 2026 primaries.
  • Monitor the implementation of Prop 36 in your local county; the "treatment-mandated felony" system will require significant local funding to actually work.
  • Reach out to your newly elected House representatives to voice your concerns on economic policy while they are still in their first "honeymoon" year of the term.