Winter in Almaty is no joke. On the morning of December 27, 2019, the air was thick with that biting Kazakh cold, hovering around -12°C. It was just after 7:00 AM. Passengers were boarding a Fokker 100, a reliable but aging workhorse of the skies, operated by Bek Air. They were headed for Nur-Sultan. Nobody expected that Bek Air Flight 2100 would stay in the air for less than thirty seconds.
It didn't just fall. It struggled.
The plane took off, but it couldn't gain altitude. Eyewitnesses and survivors described a terrifying swaying motion. The wings were dipping left and right, frantically trying to catch the air. Instead of soaring, the aircraft clipped a concrete fence and slammed into a two-story building in a residential area just outside the Almaty International Airport perimeter. 12 people died. Dozens more were pulled from the wreckage with life-altering injuries.
The Physics of a Failed Takeoff
A lot of people think plane crashes are usually about engines exploding or pilots passing out. That wasn't the case here. When you look at the flight data from Bek Air Flight 2100, the story is much more about the invisible physics of ice.
The Fokker 100 is particularly sensitive to "wing contamination." That’s a fancy way of saying even a thin layer of frost can ruin the lift. Think about how a plane flies. Air has to move smoothly over the curve of the wing. If there’s ice—even something that looks like sandpaper—it disrupts that flow. The air becomes turbulent. The lift vanishes.
Basically, the plane stalls.
👉 See also: Jeff Pike Bandidos MC: What Really Happened to the Texas Biker Boss
What's wild is that the aircraft had been sitting on the tarmac for about two days before that morning. Kazakhstan’s Interstate Aviation Committee (IAC) eventually pointed toward icing as the most likely culprit. The pilots apparently decided to de-ice only the horizontal stabilizer, leaving the wings alone. That decision likely sealed their fate. When the plane tried to rotate and climb, the wings just didn't have the "grip" on the air they needed.
Why Didn't They De-Ice the Wings?
It sounds like such a basic mistake, right? You're in Kazakhstan. It’s December. There’s ice everywhere. Why wouldn't you spray the whole plane?
Money. It almost always comes down to money or time in the regional airline business. De-icing fluid is expensive. The process takes time, which delays flights, which costs the airline more money in airport fees and passenger compensation. While the official investigation focused on the technicalities of the stall, the subtext was a systemic failure in safety culture.
Bek Air wasn't exactly a stranger to controversy. After the crash of Bek Air Flight 2100, the Civil Aviation Committee of Kazakhstan didn't just slap them on the wrist. They suspended the airline’s Air Operator Certificate. They found that the airline was frequently swapping out parts without proper documentation. Sometimes they weren't even tracking the service life of critical components. It was a mess. Honestly, the crash felt like the inevitable result of a "cut corners to keep flying" mentality.
The Fokker 100 involved in the accident was nearly 30 years old. Age alone doesn't make a plane dangerous—Delta flies old planes all the time—but it does mean you have to be obsessive about maintenance. Bek Air seemingly wasn't.
✨ Don't miss: January 6th Explained: Why This Date Still Defines American Politics
The Human Cost and the Building That Shouldn't Have Been There
There is a detail about this crash that still makes people in Almaty angry. The plane hit a house.
Why was there a house there?
In theory, the area around an airport runway should be a clear zone. It’s for safety. If a plane overshoots or loses power on takeoff, it needs a clear "runway protection zone" to slide or settle without hitting structures. But in the years leading up to the Bek Air Flight 2100 disaster, land near the Almaty airport had been illegally subdivided and sold. People built homes right under the flight path, sometimes just meters from the airport fence.
If that house hadn't been there, the death toll might have been significantly lower. The impact with the concrete building is what crushed the forward section of the fuselage. It’s where most of the fatalities occurred, including the captain, Marat Muratbaev.
The investigation into the land grab became a massive scandal in Kazakhstan. Several officials were eventually sentenced for their roles in the illegal land sales. It’s a sobering reminder that aviation safety isn't just about what happens in the cockpit; it’s about zoning laws, local government corruption, and urban planning.
🔗 Read more: Is there a bank holiday today? Why your local branch might be closed on January 12
Survival and the Aftermath
Survivors described the scene as surprisingly quiet immediately after the impact. No fire. That was the one stroke of luck. Since the wings stayed mostly intact and the fuel tanks didn't ignite, the majority of the 98 people on board walked away.
But for the airline, the fire was just starting.
Kazakhstan’s authorities moved fast. Within weeks, the entire Bek Air fleet was grounded. The government realized they couldn't vouch for the safety of any of the company's aircraft. By 2020, the airline was effectively dead. They tried to fight it in court, but the evidence of poor maintenance and safety violations was just too heavy.
What We Learned from Flight 2100
- Clean Aircraft Concept: If you see ice on a wing before takeoff, speak up. Modern aviation operates on the "Clean Aircraft Concept," meaning no takeoff should ever be attempted unless the lifting surfaces are completely clear.
- Regional Oversight Matters: Smaller, low-cost carriers in developing markets often face less scrutiny than major international players. This crash forced a total overhaul of how Kazakhstan regulates its domestic airlines.
- The "Swiss Cheese" Model: Accidents rarely have one cause. It was the weather. It was the pilot's decision not to de-ice. It was the illegal building. It was the lack of government oversight. All the holes lined up.
If you’re traveling through Central Asia today, the landscape looks different. Air Astana and its low-cost arm, FlyArystan, have largely filled the void left by Bek Air, operating much newer fleets with significantly tighter ties to international safety standards. The tragedy of Bek Air Flight 2100 served as a brutal wake-up call that "good enough" maintenance eventually leads to a morning where the plane just won't fly.
For travelers, the lesson is clear: check the safety ratings of regional carriers on sites like AirlineRatings.com. While flying remains the safest way to travel, the quality of the operator matters just as much as the quality of the plane. If an airline is consistently cutting costs on the ground, they’re likely cutting them in the air, too.
The crash remains a permanent marker in Kazakhstan's aviation history. It wasn't just a mechanical failure; it was a failure of the system that was supposed to keep those 98 people safe. Today, the ruins of the house are gone, and the regulations are tighter, but the families of the 12 who didn't come home are still living with the consequences of those thirty seconds in the Almaty sky.