If you ask a room full of people when did trickle down economics start, you'll probably hear one name shouted louder than the rest: Ronald Reagan. It's the standard answer. It's in the textbooks. But honestly? That's only a small piece of a much messier, older story.
The idea that giving breaks to the people at the top will eventually leak down to everyone else isn't just a 1980s fever dream. It’s a recurring theme in American history that pops up every time the economy hits a wall.
The Napkin That Changed Everything
Picture a swanky Washington D.C. restaurant in 1974. Two guys named Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld are sitting there with an economist named Arthur Laffer. Laffer grabs a cloth napkin and scribbles a curve on it. This "Laffer Curve" basically argued that if you cut tax rates, you could actually increase government revenue because people would be so incentivized to work and invest that the economy would explode.
This was the spark.
Before the 80s even arrived, the groundwork was being laid. People were tired of "stagflation"—that nasty mix of stagnant growth and high inflation that defined the 70s. They wanted something new. Supply-side economics, the academic sibling of trickle down, was the "new" thing. But if we’re being real, it wasn't actually new at all.
Long Before Reagan: The 1920s Version
We have to go back way further to find the actual roots. In the 1920s, Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon—a man who was incredibly wealthy himself—pushed for massive tax cuts for the rich. He called it "scientific taxation." Sound familiar? It’s the exact same logic. Mellon argued that high taxes on the wealthy forced them to hide their money in unproductive places, like tax-exempt bonds.
If you cut those taxes, he said, they’d put that money back into factories and businesses. The "Roaring Twenties" followed, which seemed to prove him right for a minute. Then, well, the Great Depression happened.
📖 Related: Craig Steinley Appraisal Institute: What Most People Get Wrong
Humorously, the term "trickle down" wasn't even meant to be a compliment. Will Rogers, the famous humorist, coined it as a joke during the Depression. He said that money was all appropriated for the top in hopes that it would trickle down to the needy. He wasn't praising the system; he was mocking it. It’s funny how a sarcastic jab became the official name for a global economic philosophy.
The 1980s Explosion
When Ronald Reagan took office in 1981, he didn't just tip his hat to these ideas. He went all in. The Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 was a monster. It slashed the top marginal tax rate from 70% to 50%, and eventually, it dropped all the way to 28% by 1986.
This was the moment when did trickle down economics start to become the dominant religion of the U.S. Treasury.
The theory was simple:
- Cut taxes for the wealthy and corporations.
- They invest that extra cash into new ventures.
- New ventures create jobs.
- More jobs mean more money for the working class.
- Everyone wins.
The reality was... complicated. The 80s did see a period of significant growth. But it also saw the national debt skyrocket and the gap between the rich and the poor begin to widen into a canyon. Reagan’s budget director, David Stockman, later admitted in a famous Atlantic interview that "supply-side" was just a "Trojan horse" to get the top tax rate down. He basically confessed that the whole thing was a way to market old-school pro-rich policies to a skeptical public.
Why Does This Keep Happening?
It’s easy to look at the data and say, "Hey, this doesn't work the way they said it would." A massive study by the London School of Economics looked at 50 years of tax cuts for the wealthy across 18 developed countries. Their conclusion? These cuts consistently increased income inequality but had almost no effect on growth or unemployment.
So why do we keep coming back to it?
Because it’s a seductive story. It sounds logical. If you make it easier for "job creators" to create jobs, they will. Right? But human behavior isn't a math equation. Sometimes, when a CEO gets a tax cut, they don't build a new factory. They buy back their own company's stock to pump up the price, or they just sit on the cash.
The Bush and Trump Eras
The 2000s saw a resurgence with the Bush tax cuts. Again, the promise was jobs and prosperity. Again, the result was a massive increase in the deficit and, eventually, a catastrophic financial crash in 2008.
Then came 2017 and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. This was the modern iteration. The corporate tax rate was slashed from 35% to 21%. Proponents promised a $4,000 to $9,000 raise for the average household. Years later, most non-partisan analyses, including those from the Congressional Research Service, found that while the cuts did lead to some investment, the primary use of the extra cash was—you guessed it—stock buybacks.
The Human Cost of the "Trickle"
When we talk about when did trickle down economics start, we aren't just talking about dates on a calendar. We're talking about a shift in the American psyche. It marked the end of the "New Deal" era, where the government was seen as a necessary check on corporate power and a provider of a social safety net.
Since the early 80s, the share of wealth held by the bottom 50% of Americans has shrunk significantly. Meanwhile, the top 1% has seen their fortunes explode. This isn't just an "oopsie" in the data. It’s a direct result of a policy that prioritizes capital over labor.
You see it in the crumbling infrastructure. You see it in the skyrocketing cost of college. You see it in the fact that many people work two jobs and still can't afford a starter home. The "trickle" often feels more like a light mist that evaporates before it hits the ground.
Is There an Alternative?
Economists like Heather Boushey and those at the Washington Center for Equitable Growth talk about "Middle-Out" economics. The idea is that growth doesn't come from the top; it comes from a strong middle class. If people have money in their pockets, they spend it. That spending creates demand. Demand is what actually forces businesses to hire and expand.
A business owner doesn't hire people because they have extra cash from a tax cut. They hire people because they have more customers than they can handle.
Actionable Insights for Navigating a Trickle-Down World
Since these policies tend to cycle in and out of fashion, you have to know how to protect your own finances regardless of what the folks in D.C. are scribbling on napkins.
Understand the Impact on Interest Rates When the government cuts taxes for the wealthy, it often has to borrow more money to cover the deficit. This can lead to higher interest rates over time. If you’re planning on a big purchase like a home, keep an eye on federal deficit trends. They aren't just abstract numbers; they affect your mortgage rate.
Don't Count on the "Trickle" for a Raise History shows that corporate tax cuts rarely translate directly to widespread salary increases for the average worker. If your company gets a windfall, don't wait for them to pass it on. Use that moment—when the company is flush with cash—to negotiate your salary or advocate for better benefits. They have the money; you just have to give them a reason to spend it on you.
Diversify Your Own Income If the economy is being built to favor owners of capital (stocks, real estate, businesses) over earners of wages, then you need to become an owner. Even in small amounts, investing in low-cost index funds allows you to capture some of the growth that stays at the top. If the system is designed to reward shareholders, you might as well be one.
Vote with Data, Not Slogans The next time a politician promises that cutting taxes on "job creators" will solve all your problems, look at the historical track record. Look at the 1920s, the 1980s, and the 2010s. The dates tell a story that the slogans often leave out. Knowing when did trickle down economics start gives you the context to see where it’s likely going next.
The reality is that economics isn't a natural law like gravity. It’s a series of choices we make about who matters most in a society. When we chose trickle-down in the early 80s, we made a specific bet. Decades later, the results are in, and they're written in the bank accounts of every citizen.
The best way to move forward is to stop waiting for the trickle and start building the foundation from the bottom up. Keep your debt low, keep your skills sharp, and don't let a clever napkin drawing dictate your financial future.
Next Steps for Financial Resilience:
- Review your tax bracket history: Understand how current policy shifts affect your take-home pay compared to previous decades.
- Audit your investments: Ensure you own assets that benefit from corporate growth, rather than just relying on a paycheck.
- Research "Middle-Out" policies: Look into local and state initiatives that focus on infrastructure and education as primary drivers of growth.