When a tragedy hits a school, people look for a "why." They look for a face. They look for a profile. Honestly, social media usually fills in those blanks way before the police do. You’ve probably seen the posts or the heated threads claiming that a specific demographic is "taking over" the statistics of mass violence. One of the questions that pops up in these intense digital debates is: what percentage of school shootings were done by gay people?
It's a heavy question. It’s also one where the actual data and the internet rumors are miles apart.
If you’re looking for a simple number, the reality is that the vast, overwhelming majority of school shooters are heterosexual, cisgender men. According to data from The Violence Project, which is one of the most comprehensive databases of mass shooters in the U.S. (tracking over 100 variables from 1966 to the present), about 98% of mass shooters are male. When you drill down into sexual orientation specifically, researchers like Dr. Jillian Peterson and Dr. James Densley have found that mass shooters are almost entirely heterosexual.
The Reality Behind the Demographics
Data doesn't lie, but it can be hard to find when everyone is shouting. Basically, when we look at the sexual orientation of perpetrators in school shootings, the numbers for LGBTQ+ individuals are "vanishingly small."
Let’s look at the numbers. Out of hundreds of cases since 1966, only a handful of shooters identified as part of the LGBTQ+ community. In fact, transgender or non-binary shooters—who often get lumped into these conversations—account for less than 0.5% to 1% of the data, depending on which specific database you use. For context, about 7% of the U.S. population identifies as LGBTQ+. This means they are actually underrepresented among mass shooters.
Most school shooters are straight men. They are usually people who have experienced significant childhood trauma, are in a personal crisis, and have access to firearms. They aren't defined by their sexual orientation; they’re defined by a specific "script" of violence they've adopted.
Why Do People Think the Percentage is Higher?
It’s about the "availability heuristic." Kinda a fancy term, but it just means we remember things that are shocking or unusual more easily. When a shooter is part of a marginalized group, the media coverage is often more intense. It becomes a talking point for days.
🔗 Read more: When Does Joe Biden's Term End: What Actually Happened
Think about the 2023 Nashville shooting or the 2024 Perry High School incident. Because the perpetrators in those specific cases were identified as transgender or gender-nonconforming, it created a massive surge in searches about what percentage of school shootings were done by gay people or trans people. People saw two cases close together and assumed it was a "trend."
It wasn’t.
Statistically, these cases were outliers. If 99 out of 100 shooters are straight men, and 1 is gay or trans, that 1 case gets 50% of the headlines because it breaks the "typical" profile. This creates a false perception of reality.
Breaking Down the "Standard" Profile
If you want to understand who actually commits these acts, you have to look past sexual orientation. The FBI and the U.S. Secret Service have been studying this for decades. Their 2019 report, Protecting America’s Schools, looked at 41 incidents of school violence.
They found no "profile."
Wait, that sounds contradictory, right? What they mean is there’s no specific race, religion, or sexual orientation that predicts a shooter. However, there are common behaviors.
💡 You might also like: Fire in Idyllwild California: What Most People Get Wrong
- Social Stressors: Nearly every attacker experienced significant stress involving peers or romantic partners.
- Grievance: They felt they had been wronged by the school or a specific group.
- Suicidal Ideation: Most school shooters don't plan to survive the day. It is a final act of despair.
The Victimization Gap
Here is a detail that doesn't get enough play: LGBTQ+ students are much more likely to be the victims of school violence than the perpetrators.
Data from Sandy Hook Promise shows that gay and lesbian youth are twice as likely as their straight peers to be threatened or injured with a weapon on school property. For transgender youth, that number jumps even higher. About 29% of trans students report being threatened with a weapon at school.
So, while the internet might be obsessed with the idea of the "LGBTQ+ shooter," the reality in our hallways is that these kids are the ones looking over their shoulders.
What Science Says About Motivation
Dr. Ragy Girgis, a professor of clinical psychiatry at Columbia University, has stated clearly that sexual orientation or gender identity is not a "causative factor" in mass shootings.
Violence is complex. It’s a mix of:
- History of Trauma: Often severe childhood abuse.
- Radicalization: Often via online forums that "game-ify" school shootings.
- Crisis Point: A recent loss, like a breakup or being fired.
- Means: Access to a high-powered weapon.
None of those four points have anything to do with being gay. When we focus on the "what percentage" question, we often miss the "how do we stop it" part. We get distracted by identity politics instead of looking at the red flags that actually matter—like someone posting a countdown on social media or suddenly buying a bunch of ammo they can't afford.
📖 Related: Who Is More Likely to Win the Election 2024: What Most People Get Wrong
Is the Data Changing?
Some folks argue that because more young people are coming out as LGBTQ+, the numbers are bound to go up. While that's mathematically possible, it hasn't happened in a way that shifts the overall statistics. The "typical" shooter is still a young, isolated, cisgender male.
Even if you included every "confirmed" and "alleged" LGBTQ+ shooter from the last decade, you'd still be looking at a figure well below 2%.
Actionable Steps for School Safety
Instead of tracking sexual orientation—which doesn't help us predict violence—experts suggest focusing on Behavioral Threat Assessment.
- Report Concerns: If a student mentions "going out in a blaze of glory" or shows an obsession with past shooters, that's a red flag regardless of who they are dating.
- Support Mental Health: Schools with robust counseling programs see fewer incidents of extreme violence.
- Secure the Environment: Limiting easy access to firearms for minors is the single most effective way to lower these numbers.
The numbers on what percentage of school shootings were done by gay people are clear: it is a tiny, statistically insignificant fraction of cases. The real "profile" of a school shooter is someone in deep pain, with a grudge and a gun.
If we want to keep kids safe, we have to look at the behavior, not the identity. Focus on the kid who is withdrawing from friends, the one who is being bullied, and the one who suddenly has access to a weapon at home. That’s where the real prevention happens.
To stay informed, you can review the full public data sets at The Violence Project or read the Secret Service’s "Analysis of Targeted School Violence" to understand the behavioral markers that actually lead to these events.