Religion is rarely simple. If you grew up in a traditional church, you probably heard one very specific, very loud message. But if you’ve spent any time on TikTok or in progressive religious circles lately, you’ve likely heard the exact opposite. It’s confusing. People are shouting, quoting Greek words they can’t pronounce, and using ancient texts to justify everything from exclusion to total affirmation. So, what does the Bible say about being gay, really?
It’s not just one verse.
To get this right, we have to look at the "Clobber Passages"—those six or seven verses that usually end up on protest signs—and see what they actually meant to the people who wrote them. We’re talking about a world without the concept of "sexual orientation." In the ancient Near East, nobody was "gay" or "straight" in the way we use those words today. Those are modern identities. Back then, it was all about power, procreation, and social hierarchy.
The Big Six: Breaking Down the Verses
Most people start with Leviticus. You know the one. Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13. These verses call male-male sex an "abomination." It sounds final. Harsh. But scholars like Dr. Jay Michaelson point out that the Hebrew word used here, to'evah, doesn't usually mean "intrinsic evil." It often refers to a ritual impurity or something that "crosses a boundary" between cultures.
It’s in the same book that bans eating shrimp and wearing polyester blends.
Does that mean it doesn't matter? Not necessarily. But it means the context is specific to a time when the Israelites were trying to stay distinct from the Canaanites and Egyptians. They needed babies to survive as a tribe. Anything that didn't lead to babies was seen as a threat to the community's future.
Then we move to the New Testament. Romans 1:26-27 is the big heavy hitter for Paul. He talks about "unnatural" relations. Traditionalists say this is a blanket ban on all same-sex behavior. However, many modern theologians, including the late David E. Fredrickson, argue Paul was actually critiquing excess. In the Roman world, it was often believed that if you were too "lustful," you’d eventually get bored with the opposite sex and look for something "new." Paul might have been attacking exploitation and lack of self-control rather than a committed, loving relationship between two people of the same gender.
✨ Don't miss: Am I Gay Buzzfeed Quizzes and the Quest for Identity Online
The Translation Problem: What’s an Arsenokoitai?
Language is tricky. Words change.
If you pick up a Bible from 1900, you won't find the word "homosexual." It literally wasn't there. The word didn't enter English Bible translations until 1946 in the Revised Standard Version (RSV). Before that, the Greek words malakoi and arsenokoitai (found in 1 Corinthians 6:9 and 1 Timothy 1:10) were translated differently.
Malakoi basically means "soft." It was often used to describe men who were lazy, cowardly, or "effeminate" in a way that shirked their social duties.
Arsenokoitai is even weirder. Paul basically made the word up. It's a compound word: "male" and "bed."
For centuries, translators thought it meant people who exploited others sexually, or even male prostitutes. The decision to lump all these specific ancient behaviors under the modern umbrella of "homosexuality" is a relatively recent editorial choice. It’s a huge distinction. If Paul was talking about sex trafficking or pederasty—which were rampant in Corinth—that’s a very different message than a ban on a lifelong marriage between two men.
Sodom and Gomorrah: It’s Not About What You Think
Ask a random person what happened in Sodom, and they’ll say "homosexuality." But if you actually read the rest of the Bible, it tells a different story.
The prophet Ezekiel (16:49) explicitly defines the sin of Sodom. He says they were arrogant, overfed, and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy. The "wickedness" was a lack of hospitality and an attempt at gang rape. It was about power and violence. Using the Sodom story to condemn a quiet, monogamous gay couple is, frankly, a massive stretch that ignores the biblical text's own commentary.
🔗 Read more: Easy recipes dinner for two: Why you are probably overcomplicating date night
Different Perspectives within the Church
The debate isn't going away. Honestly, it's splitting entire denominations.
On one side, you have the "Side A" (Affirming) view. They believe that God blesses same-sex relationships just like heterosexual ones. They point to the "Fruit of the Spirit." If a gay couple is showing love, joy, peace, and patience, how can the relationship be "bad"? They argue that the Bible’s "trajectory" is always toward more inclusion—moving from a tribal focus to one where "there is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female."
On the other side, "Side B" Christians believe that while being gay isn't a sin, acting on it is. They advocate for celibacy. They hold to a "complementarian" view, believing that marriage is strictly a spiritual mystery that requires one man and one woman to reflect the image of God.
And then there’s the growing group of people who are just... tired. They see the harm caused by "Conversion Therapy"—a practice condemned by major health organizations like the APA—and realize that the traditional interpretation has real-world body counts.
The Silence of Jesus
It’s worth noting that Jesus never mentions same-sex behavior. Not once.
He talks a lot about divorce. He talks a lot about money. He talks constantly about the poor.
💡 You might also like: How is gum made? The sticky truth about what you are actually chewing
Some argue his silence means he upheld the Jewish laws of his time. Others argue that if it were a "foundational moral issue," he would have brought it up, especially given how much he challenged other social norms. He spent his time with the outcasts and the marginalized, the people the "religious experts" of his day thought were "unclean." That’s a detail you can’t just ignore.
What Does the Bible Say About Being Gay? Practical Next Steps
If you’re trying to navigate this for yourself or a loved one, "just reading the Bible" usually isn't enough because everyone brings their own baggage to the page. You need more tools.
1. Study the cultural context.
Read books like God and the Gay Christian by Matthew Vines or The Bible and Homosexuality by Justin R. Cannon. These aren't just "opinion" pieces; they dive into the original Hebrew and Greek. Understanding the difference between a 1st-century Roman "master-slave" sexual encounter and a 21st-century marriage is vital.
2. Look at the fruit.
Theology has consequences. If a specific interpretation leads to depression, self-harm, or broken families, it’s worth asking if that interpretation aligns with a God who is described as Love.
3. Find a "Third Space."
You don't have to choose between your faith and your identity (or your support for others) overnight. There are churches that are "Open and Affirming" (usually United Church of Christ, Episcopal, or ELCA Lutheran) where you can hear these perspectives in a safe environment.
4. Accept the ambiguity.
The Bible is a library of books written over 1,500 years. It’s okay if it doesn't give a simple "yes/no" answer to a modern social question. Faith is often about sitting in the tension rather than having a perfect proof-text.
The conversation about what the Bible says about being gay is shifting. It’s moving away from soundbites and toward a much deeper, more scholarly, and more empathetic look at what these ancient words actually meant. Whether you're a believer, a skeptic, or somewhere in the middle, recognizing the complexity is the first step toward a more honest conversation.
Actionable Insight: If you are currently in a faith community and struggling with these texts, seek out a "liturgy of lament" or a support group like Q Christian Fellowship. Don't try to deconstruct thousands of years of tradition in isolation. Start by separating the "core" gospel message of grace from the "cultural" layers of the ancient Mediterranean world.