Names matter. A lot. Most people think they know exactly what they’re saying when they use the word Sioux, but if you ask a member of the Oceti Sakowin what that word actually means, you’re going to get a response that’s way more complicated than a simple dictionary definition. It’s a bit of a mess, honestly.
Historians and linguists have been arguing about this for decades. You've likely seen it in textbooks or movies as a catch-all term for the indigenous people of the Great Plains. But the reality is that the word itself isn't even from their own language. Imagine if everyone called you by a nickname your worst enemy gave you behind your back. That’s basically how we got here.
The Linguistic Mystery: What Does Sioux Mean?
If you want the short version, "Sioux" is an abbreviation of a French version of an Ojibwe word. But the long version is way more interesting. The word is generally believed to be a colonial "telephone game" version of the term Nadouessioux.
Back in the 17th century, French explorers and fur traders were hanging out with the Ojibwe (Anishinaabe) people in the Great Lakes region. The Ojibwe were rivals with the groups living to the west. When the French asked the Ojibwe who those people were, they used the term Naadouwesieu.
A Snake in the Grass?
For a long time, the standard "fun fact" was that this meant "little snakes." This comes from the word nadowe, which can mean snake in some Algonquian languages. The "little" part (-sioux) was supposedly added to distinguish them from the "big snakes," the Iroquois.
But modern linguists like Jean-Luc Chartier have pointed out that this might be a total mistranslation. In many cases, the root word actually refers to "people who speak a foreign language" or "the others." It wasn't necessarily an insult, just a description. Over time, the French shortened Nadouessioux down to just Sioux, and that’s the name that stuck in the history books and government treaties.
The Name They Actually Call Themselves
The people we call Sioux usually refer to themselves as the Oceti Sakowin. It translates to the "Seven Council Fires." It’s a beautiful, descriptive name that actually tells you something about how their society is structured. They aren't just one big, monolithic group.
The Seven Council Fires are made up of three main linguistic groups. You’ve probably heard these names before, but maybe didn't realize they were all part of the same family:
- The Dakota: These are the "Eastern" groups, often associated with the Minnesota area.
- The Nakota: These groups traditionally lived in the areas we now call South Dakota and North Dakota.
- The Lakota: These are the "Western" groups, famous for their horse culture and fierce resistance during the 19th-century Indian Wars.
Each of these names—Dakota, Nakota, and Lakota—essentially means "ally" or "friend" in their respective dialects. It’s about connection. It’s about being part of a group that looks out for one another. When you compare "Friend" to a French-mangled version of a rival’s description, you can see why many people prefer their original names.
Why Some People Hate the Name (And Why Others Still Use It)
Language is alive. It changes. Because "Sioux" has been used in official treaties and legal documents for over 200 years, it’s become part of the legal identity for many tribes. The Rosebud Sioux Tribe or the Oglala Sioux Tribe use the name in their official government titles. It’s a matter of legal standing and historical recognition.
However, there is a growing movement, especially among younger generations, to ditch the name entirely. You'll hear more people identifying specifically as Lakota or Dakota. It’s a way of reclaiming an identity that was filtered through a colonial lens.
Kinda like how you might have a legal name on your birth certificate that you never use because it doesn't feel like "you."
💡 You might also like: How Do You Make Chicken Salad Sandwiches That Don’t Get Soggy or Boring?
The Power of Naming
Think about the psychological impact. If you are told your name means "snake," that carries a certain weight. If you know your name means "ally," that changes how you view your place in the world. It’s about sovereignty. Not just political sovereignty, but linguistic sovereignty.
The struggle over what does Sioux mean isn't just a debate for librarians. It’s about who gets to define a culture. For the Lakota, Dakota, and Nakota, the fight to use their own names is a fight for the truth of their history.
Historical Context and the Great Plains
To really understand the weight of the name, you have to look at the 1800s. This was the era of the Fort Laramie Treaties, the Battle of the Little Bighorn, and the tragic massacre at Wounded Knee. In all of these events, the U.S. government used the term "Sioux" to categorize people who were often from very different bands with different leadership.
By lumping everyone under one name, the government could make sweeping laws and treaties that ignored the nuances of individual tribal councils. It made the bureaucracy easier for the colonizers, but it made life incredibly difficult for the people actually living on the land.
- Sitting Bull (Tatanka Iyotake) was Hunkpapa Lakota.
- Crazy Horse (Tasunke Witko) was Oglala Lakota.
- Red Cloud (Mahpiya Luta) was also Oglala.
They didn't call themselves Sioux warriors. They were Lakota. They fought for their specific lands and their specific ways of life. When we use the broad term, we sometimes accidentally erase those specific identities.
Common Misconceptions About the Word
There are so many myths floating around out there. Let's clear some up.
First, "Sioux" is not a word in any Native American language. It is strictly an external label. If you go back to the year 1500 and yell "Sioux!" in the middle of a village, no one would turn around.
Second, it’s not just one tribe. As we mentioned with the Seven Council Fires, it’s a massive confederacy. It’s more like saying "The European Union" than saying "France." Each fire has its own history, its own leaders, and its own specific geographic territory.
Third, the idea that it only means snake is likely wrong. While it's a popular story, the "foreign speaker" origin is much more supported by historical linguistics. But because the "snake" story is more dramatic, it’s the one that people keep repeating.
How to Use the Term Respectfully Today
If you’re writing a paper, visiting a reservation, or just talking about history, you might wonder if you should use the word at all. Honestly, it depends on the context.
If you are talking about a specific tribal government that uses the word in their name (like the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe), then using "Sioux" is factually and legally correct in that specific instance. However, if you are talking about the people, their culture, or their language, it is almost always better to be specific. Are they Lakota? Dakota? Use the name they use for themselves.
It shows that you've done the work. It shows respect for their specific heritage.
Actionable Insights for Moving Forward
Understanding the nuances of indigenous naming isn't just an academic exercise. It’s about building better relationships and being more accurate in how we describe the world.
Pay attention to tribal websites. If you’re researching or visiting, look at how the tribe describes itself on its official "About" page. They will tell you exactly how they want to be addressed.
Be specific in your language. Instead of saying "Sioux art," you might look closer and realize you're actually looking at "Lakota beadwork." That specificity adds value and accuracy to your own knowledge.
Listen to the elders. In many communities, the elders are the keepers of the original meanings of words. If you have the chance to listen to oral histories or read accounts from tribal members, prioritize those over 19th-century history books written by outsiders.
📖 Related: Why Your White Gray Black Cat Might Be Way Rarer Than You Think
The question of what does Sioux mean ultimately leads to a deeper realization: the names we give things determine how we treat them. By moving past the "snake" myths and the French abbreviations, we get closer to seeing the Oceti Sakowin for who they really are—a complex, resilient, and deeply connected group of allies.
To dig deeper into this history, you should check out the work of scholars like Dr. Elizabeth Cook-Lynn or look into the archives of the Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian. They offer primary sources that move beyond the surface-level definitions usually found online. Respect the name, but respect the people behind the name even more.