If you’ve spent any time in the indie gaming scene over the last few years, you’ve probably seen the name Omocat pop up in some pretty heated Twitter threads. Usually, it starts with a simple question from a newcomer: what did Omocat do? People want to know why a creator who made one of the most beloved psychological horror RPGs of the decade is constantly under a microscope. It’s a mess of old t-shirts, development delays, and the kind of internet archeology that happens when someone goes from a niche artist to a major industry figure.
Omocat isn't just a person; it’s a brand. Before Omori was a massive hit on Steam, Omocat was a popular illustrator known for a specific, vibrant, yet slightly macabre aesthetic. But when you’re in the public eye for over a decade, things get complicated.
Most of the drama boils down to three specific things: a controversial t-shirt design from years ago, the massive delays during the Omori Kickstarter, and some smaller-scale "cancellation" attempts regarding her past artwork. It’s a lot to untangle. Let's get into it.
The T-Shirt That Started a Firestorm
The most frequent answer to what did Omocat do involves a shirt. Back in the early 2010s, Omocat was primarily a freelance artist and merchandise designer. She released a shirt featuring the word "Shota" (a Japanese term often associated with the sexualization of young boys) in a stylized font.
Honestly, the internet never forgets.
Even though the shirt was pulled from the store years ago, screenshots circulate every few months like clockwork. Critics argue that the design normalized or even promoted "shotacon" content. On the flip side, supporters often point out the context of the time—the early 2010s Tumblr and DeviantArt era was, frankly, a lawless wasteland of edgy aesthetics where many artists played with "taboo" Japanese subculture terms without fully grasping (or caring about) the real-world implications.
Omocat did eventually address this. She didn't write a ten-page PR statement, but she acknowledged the mistake and removed the merchandise. For some, that was enough. For others, it’s a permanent black mark on her career. It’s one of those situations where your perspective probably depends on how much weight you give to "edgy" content from a decade ago versus a person's current output.
💡 You might also like: Marvel Rivals Emma Frost X Revolution Skin: What Most People Get Wrong
The Omori Kickstarter: A Lesson in Development Hell
If you want to understand the frustration within the Omori fanbase, you have to look at the timeline. The game was funded on Kickstarter in 2014. It was supposed to come out in 2015.
It didn't come out in 2015. Or 2016. Or 2017.
It actually took six and a half years to release. During that time, the "what did Omocat do" discourse wasn't about social issues; it was about money. Backers were furious. The project raised over $200,000, which was a huge amount for an indie dev at the time, but the updates were sporadic. People started using the word "scam."
Why was everyone so mad?
- Silence: There were long periods where the development team just... didn't say anything.
- Engine Swaps: The game moved from RPG Maker VX Ace to RPG Maker MV. This basically meant rebuilding huge chunks of the game from scratch.
- Scope Creep: The game got way bigger than originally planned. What was meant to be a small project turned into a 20+ hour epic.
When the game finally dropped in December 2020, most of the "scam" talk evaporated because the game was, well, incredible. It’s rare for a game to survive that much hype and disappointment and still land a 10/10 from most of its audience. But the scars from that development period still influence how people view Omocat's management style.
The "Old Art" Digging and the Nature of Online Fandom
In 2026, we’re seeing a lot of "accountability culture" that borders on digital archaeology. People have scoured Omocat’s old sketches from her college days, looking for anything problematic.
They found things.
📖 Related: Finding the Right Words That Start With Oc 5 Letters for Your Next Wordle Win
Some old drawings featured themes that people found distasteful or "pro-contact." It’s a messy debate. Is an artist defined by the darkest things they drew in their early 20s? Omocat’s work has always dealt with heavy, uncomfortable themes—depression, suicide, trauma, and repressed memories. That’s literally what Omori is about.
The controversy arises when people can’t tell the difference between "exploring a dark theme" and "endorsing a harmful behavior." This is a nuance that Twitter often lacks. You’ve got one camp saying she’s a dangerous influence and another camp saying she’s an artist who shouldn't be censored for her past explorations of the macabre.
Examining the Professional Impact
Despite the noise, Omocat’s professional trajectory has been upward. She’s collaborated with massive brands. She’s worked with Hololive, designing the "Council" generation of Vtubers. She’s had official collaborations with Sanrio.
If the industry thought she was truly toxic, these deals wouldn't happen.
Companies like Sanrio are notoriously protective of their brand. They do deep background checks. The fact that Omocat remains a powerhouse in the merch and gaming space suggests that, in the eyes of corporate partners, the "what did Omocat do" questions are mostly localized to niche internet drama rather than actual professional misconduct.
Breaking Down the Misconceptions
One of the biggest issues with this topic is how much misinformation spreads. You’ll see TikToks claiming she’s "done for" or that she "stole the Kickstarter money."
👉 See also: Jigsaw Would Like Play Game: Why We’re Still Obsessed With Digital Puzzles
Neither of those is true.
She spent the money making the game. It’s right there on Steam. You can play it. And she’s clearly not "done," considering her merch drops still sell out in minutes.
The real story isn't about a "villain" or a "victim." It’s about a creator who started in a very different era of the internet, made some questionable choices in her youth, struggled with the massive pressure of a high-profile Kickstarter, and eventually delivered a masterpiece that changed a lot of lives.
What You Should Actually Know:
- The "Shota" shirt was a real thing, it was a mistake, and it was deleted years ago.
- The Omori delay was caused by technical hurdles and scope creep, not theft.
- The artist’s past work is often dark and "edgy," which fits her established brand of psychological horror.
How to Handle the Discourse Today
If you're looking into this because you're worried about supporting the creator, the best thing to do is look at the current state of her work. Omori is a game that has helped thousands of people deal with grief and mental health struggles. The team at Omocat Studio has grown, and they seem much more professional than they were in the "radio silence" days of 2016.
We have to allow creators room to grow. If we judge everyone by the worst thing they did or said in 2012, nobody would be left standing. At the same time, it’s fair for fans to ask for transparency.
Actionable Insights for Navigating Creator Controversies:
- Check the dates. Is the thing you're mad about from ten years ago? If so, look for a more recent track record.
- Verify the "Proof." Screenshots can be faked or stripped of context. Look for the original source or a direct archive if possible.
- Separate Art from Artist (If You Can). Some people can’t play Omori knowing the creator’s history. That’s okay. Others feel the game’s message is valuable regardless. Both are valid personal choices.
- Follow Official Dev Logs. If you're ever backing a project, don't just look at the art. Look at the "Updates" tab. See how they handle delays. That’s the best indicator of future behavior.
The "Omocat" situation is a perfect case study in how the internet handles growth. We want our creators to be perfect from day one, but they rarely are. They're humans who learn in public, often making huge mistakes along the way. Whether you choose to support her work or skip it, make sure you're basing that decision on the full picture, not just a viral thread designed to get clicks.