It happened fast. One minute, late-night TV was business as usual, and the next, a single monologue blew up the internet. If you've been scrolling through social media lately, you’ve likely seen the fallout. People are still arguing over one specific question: What did Jimmy say about Charlie Kirk?
We're talking about Jimmy Kimmel. The ABC host found himself at the center of a massive firestorm in September 2025 following the tragic assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk. It wasn't just a "bad joke" or a slip of the tongue. It was a commentary on a national tragedy that led to a major network show being pulled off the air.
Honestly, the whole situation is a mess. It’s a mix of grief, political finger-pointing, and the kind of media tribalism that makes you want to throw your phone out a window.
The Monologue That Changed Everything
So, what was actually said? On Monday, September 15, 2025, Jimmy Kimmel took to his stage for the opening monologue of Jimmy Kimmel Live!. The mood in the country was already incredibly tense. Charlie Kirk had been shot and killed just days earlier while speaking at Utah Valley University.
Kimmel started by acknowledging the "senseless murder" of Kirk, but he quickly pivoted to the political reaction. This is where things got heated.
"We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them, and doing everything they can to score political points from it."
That single sentence was the spark. Kimmel essentially suggested that the shooter, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, was a member of the "MAGA gang." At the time Kimmel said this, the shooter's exact motives were still being pieced together by authorities.
📖 Related: Typhoon Tip and the Largest Hurricane on Record: Why Size Actually Matters
He didn't stop there. Kimmel went on to criticize how President Donald Trump was handling the loss of someone he called a friend. He compared the President's response to a "four-year-old mourning a goldfish." He even joked about the administration's focus on a new $200 million White House ballroom in the midst of the tragedy.
It was classic Kimmel—biting, sarcastic, and unyielding—but the timing was seen by many as incredibly insensitive.
The Backlash and the Suspension
The reaction was almost instantaneous. Within hours, clips of the monologue were everywhere. Conservative commentators and Trump administration officials, including Stephen Miller, were livid. They accused Kimmel of spreading misinformation and "victim blaming."
It wasn't just talk. The fallout had real-world consequences:
- Brendan Carr, the FCC Chair, blasted the remarks and encouraged local affiliates to take action.
- Nexstar Media Group, which operates dozens of ABC affiliates, announced they would no longer carry the program.
- ABC (owned by Disney) eventually bowed to the pressure and suspended Jimmy Kimmel Live! indefinitely.
The network called the remarks "offensive and insensitive at a critical time." For a show that had been a staple of late-night TV for over two decades, it was a stunning fall from grace.
Was Kimmel Factually Correct?
This is the part where things get complicated. Kimmel’s claim that the shooter was "one of them" (referring to the MAGA movement) turned out to be factually shaky, according to emerging evidence.
👉 See also: Melissa Calhoun Satellite High Teacher Dismissal: What Really Happened
Court documents and investigations by authorities in Utah later revealed a different story. Text messages from the shooter, Tyler Robinson, to his partner suggested he had moved significantly to the left politically. He reportedly told his flatmate, "I had enough of his hatred," referring to Kirk.
Prosecutors pointed to evidence that Robinson believed Kirk was a "hateful" figure. This contradicted Kimmel’s on-air suggestion that the killer was a right-wing extremist. This discrepancy is what fueled the "misinformation" narrative that eventually led to the show's preemption.
Other "Jimmys" in the Mix
Because the internet loves to confuse things, "Jimmy" isn't always Kimmel. Depending on where you hang out online, you might be hearing about other Jimmys talking about Kirk.
Jimmy Failla, the host of Fox Across America, took a completely different approach. He spent several segments praising Kirk's legacy and criticizing the "dishonest actors" pushing conspiracy theories about the assassination. Failla focused on the contrast between how different political groups handle tragedy.
Then there’s Jimmy Dore. The independent commentator and comedian spent a lot of time looking at the "suspicious" elements of the case. He highlighted reports of unusual Google search patterns from Washington D.C. and Israel that allegedly occurred before the shooting. Dore's take was less about the politics of the killer and more about questioning the official narrative of the investigation.
Even MrBeast (Jimmy Donaldson) got dragged into the peripheries of the conversation, mostly because of his massive platform and the way YouTube algorithms bundle "Jimmy" and "Charlie Kirk" content together. For the record, MrBeast didn't have a public feud with Kirk; he was mostly caught in the crossfire of trending keywords.
✨ Don't miss: Wisconsin Judicial Elections 2025: Why This Race Broke Every Record
Why This Still Matters
The reason people are still searching for "what did jimmy say about charlie kirk" isn't just because of the drama. It’s because it represents a massive shift in how we handle information in real-time.
When a high-profile figure is killed, the rush to "claim" the tragedy for a political side is intense. Kimmel’s monologue was seen as a prime example of that rush. By labeling the shooter before the facts were fully out, he stepped into a minefield that eventually ended his show's run.
It also highlights the power of local affiliates. We usually think of the big networks (ABC, NBC, CBS) as having all the power. But when Nexstar and Sinclair started pulling the plug on Kimmel in specific cities like Nashville, New Orleans, and St. Louis, it forced Disney’s hand.
What You Should Take Away
If you're trying to make sense of this whole saga, here are the cold, hard facts you need to know:
- Kimmel didn't celebrate the death, but he did mock the political reaction to it and mischaracterized the shooter's leanings.
- The shooter was politically motivated, but based on court documents, he was an opponent of Kirk's ideology, not a supporter.
- The "Jimmy" in question is mostly Kimmel, though Jimmy Failla and Jimmy Dore have also been vocal from very different angles.
- The consequences were real. Late-night TV changed overnight because of a few minutes of airtime.
Basically, it was a perfect storm. A tragic event, a heated political climate, and a host who pushed the envelope a little too far at the wrong moment.
Next Steps for You:
If you want to see the full context for yourself, you can still find the archived monologue on various "free speech" video platforms, as many official ABC clips have been removed. You might also want to look up the official statements from the Utah County Attorney’s Office regarding Tyler Robinson to see the actual evidence used in the court case. This will give you the most accurate picture of the motive, independent of the media spin.
For a deeper dive into how this affected the 2026 media landscape, check out the reports on Nexstar’s new programming guidelines for late-night content. It's a fascinating look at how networks are trying to "de-risk" their comedy shows.