Honestly, whenever a school shooting happens, everyone rushes to their corners. People start screaming about gun laws, others talk about mental health, and somewhere in the middle of that storm, Charlie Kirk usually has a microphone in his hand. If you’ve been following the news lately, you know things have taken a dark turn. On September 10, 2025, Kirk was actually killed in a targeted shooting at Utah Valley University. The irony is heavy because, just moments before he was hit, he was literally answering a student’s question about school shootings and gun violence.
It’s a lot to process. One minute he’s debating a student about the "transgender shooter" narrative, and the next, a gunman from a nearby building ends his life. That same afternoon, news broke about a separate shooting at Evergreen High School in Colorado. It was a bizarre, tragic collision of events that has people digging back into everything Kirk ever said about the Second Amendment and campus safety.
The "Prudent Deal" and the Cost of Freedom
If you want to understand Kirk’s stance, you have to look at a clip from 2023 that went viral again right after his death. He was at a Turning Point USA event in Salt Lake City. A student asked him about the reality of gun deaths in America. Kirk didn’t dodge it, but his answer was—well, it was blunt.
He basically said that you’re never going to get gun deaths to zero in a society with an armed citizenry. He called the idea of a "utopian" gun-free society "drivel." Then came the line that people still use to criticize him: he said it is "worth it" to have the cost of some gun deaths every year to protect the Second Amendment. In his view, the right to bear arms is the "prudent" price paid to ensure all other God-given rights stay intact.
For Kirk, it wasn't that he didn't care about the victims. He’d often say he prayed for the families. But he viewed the Second Amendment as a shield against a much larger, more systemic type of violence—tyranny. He argued that if you take away the guns, you don't just stop the "bad guys"; you leave the "good guys" defenseless against a government that could eventually turn on them.
✨ Don't miss: Who Has Trump Pardoned So Far: What Really Happened with the 47th President's List
Armed Guards vs. Gun Control
Kirk’s solution to school shootings was never about taking guns away. In fact, he wanted more of them, just in the right hands. He constantly pushed for:
- Armed guards at every entrance. He often asked why we protect banks, jewelry stores, and politicians with armed men but leave schools as "gun-free zones."
- Abolishing "Gun-Free Zones." He argued these signs are basically invitations for shooters because they know no one can shoot back.
- Fathers in the home. This was a big one for him. He linked the rise in mass shootings to a "fatherless epidemic," arguing that young men without strong male figures are more likely to become radicalized or mentally unstable.
He didn't believe in "red flag laws" or universal background checks in the way Democrats do. He saw those as "slippery slopes." To him, every law passed was just one step closer to total confiscation.
The Final Debate at Utah Valley University
The day he died, the conversation was specifically about who is doing the shooting. Kirk had been leaning into a narrative about "transgender shooters" following a few high-profile cases. At the UVU event, a student challenged him on this, pointing out that only a tiny fraction of mass shooters—about five in the last decade—were transgender.
Kirk’s response was, "Too many."
🔗 Read more: Why the 2013 Moore Oklahoma Tornado Changed Everything We Knew About Survival
He was trying to make a point about the intersection of mental health, gender ideology, and violence. But the debate never finished. The shot from the nearby building cut the conversation short. It's a surreal moment in American history—a man who spent his life arguing that guns make us safer was killed by one while defending that very point.
What Most People Get Wrong About His Views
People often paint Kirk as some sort of "gun nut" who didn't care about dead kids. That’s a bit of a caricature. If you actually listen to his long-form podcasts, he talked a lot about the "spiritual rot" in America.
He didn't think the gun was the problem; he thought the person holding it was a symptom of a broken culture. He’d blame "woke" education, the decline of the nuclear family, and the loss of religious values. He’d say, "We used to have guns in the back of trucks in high school parking lots and we didn't have school shootings. What changed? The guns didn't change. We did."
Whether you agree with that logic or not, that was his core philosophy. He believed that trying to fix a "heart problem" with a "metal problem" (gun laws) was a fool's errand.
💡 You might also like: Ethics in the News: What Most People Get Wrong
The Aftermath and Your Next Steps
Since his death, Turning Point USA has actually seen a massive spike in interest. Over 50,000 people reached out to start new chapters within days. His followers see him as a martyr for the cause, while his critics see his death as a tragic validation of why we need stricter laws.
The conversation isn't going away. If you’re trying to navigate this landscape, here is what you should actually do to stay informed:
1. Look at the data yourself. Don't just take a soundbite from a 30-second TikTok. Look up the FBI's Unified Crime Reporting (UCR) program to see the actual statistics on where and how gun violence happens.
2. Read the "Armed School Guards" studies. There are varying reports on how effective they actually are. Some studies show they deter shooters; others show they don't change much. It’s worth reading the actual white papers from places like the National Institute of Justice.
3. Understand the "Gun-Free Zone" debate. Research the 1990 Gun-Free School Zones Act. Look at the legal arguments for and against it so you can talk about it without just repeating talking points.
4. Watch the full UVU footage. Don't just watch the news clips. Watching the full 20-minute lead-up gives you the context of what was being said right before the violence broke out.
It's a messy, emotional topic. Kirk knew that. He thrived in that mess. Now that he's gone, the debate has only gotten louder. Understanding exactly what he said—without the filter of a news anchor—is the only way to have a real conversation about where the country goes from here.