When news broke about the horrific shooting at Club Q in Colorado Springs back in November 2022, the immediate shock was followed by a flood of questions about the motive. People wanted to know why. Then, a few days into the legal proceedings, a massive curveball hit the news cycle. A public defender filed a motion claiming that the suspect, Anderson Lee Aldrich, was non-binary and used they/them pronouns.
The internet exploded.
Everyone was asking: was the Colorado shooter trans or was this just a cynical legal strategy to avoid hate crime charges? It’s a messy question. Honestly, it’s one of those situations where the legal reality and the social reality seem to be miles apart, and trying to find the "truth" requires digging through court transcripts, family history, and the way the justice system handles identity.
The unexpected "non-binary" claim in court
So, here is how it actually went down. Just days after the shooting that killed five people and injured dozens more, the defense team dropped a footnote in a standard motion. They stated that Aldrich was non-binary and that, in all future filings, the court should refer to them as "Mx. Aldrich."
It caught everyone off guard.
For the victims’ families and the survivors of the LGBTQ+ nightclub, this felt like a slap in the face. They had just experienced a massacre in what was supposed to be a safe haven. To then hear that the person holding the gun claimed to be part of the community they attacked? It felt fake. Many people immediately assumed this was a "troll" or a calculated move by the defense to dismantle the prosecution’s hate crime narrative. If you are part of the community, can you be guilty of a hate crime against that same community? Under the law, yes, but it makes the prosecutor's job a lot harder.
✨ Don't miss: Why Every Tornado Warning MN Now Live Alert Demands Your Immediate Attention
What the evidence actually showed
District Attorney Michael Allen and his team weren't buying it. During the preliminary hearings and the eventual sentencing, they laid out a mountain of evidence that suggested a very different internal world for the shooter.
Prosecutors pointed to Aldrich’s online activity. They found that the shooter had frequently used anti-LGBTQ+ slurs and had frequented extremist platforms where "trolling" about gender identity was a common tactic to mock progressives. There was also the "Neo-Nazi" website evidence. Prosecutors showed that Aldrich had shared a video of a shooting at a mosque and was deeply involved in online subcultures that glorified mass violence and white supremacy.
None of the witnesses who knew Aldrich personally—former friends or family members—had ever heard them mention being non-binary or using different pronouns before the shooting happened. Not one.
The family dynamic
If you look at the shooter's upbringing, it was chaotic. Their father, Aaron Brink, was a former MMA fighter and adult film actor who made headlines for his bizarre reaction to the shooting. When interviewed by CBS 8 in San Diego, Brink didn't initially express horror at the murders. Instead, his first concern was his son's potential sexuality. He said, "And then I go, 'Wait, he's gay? And he shouldn't be here. We're Mormons. We don't do gay.'"
It was a disturbing look into the environment Aldrich grew up in. It suggested a household where anti-gay sentiment was the baseline. This adds a layer of complexity. Did Aldrich struggle with their identity in a repressive home, or did they absorb the hate they were raised with? Most of the evidence points toward the latter.
🔗 Read more: Brian Walshe Trial Date: What Really Happened with the Verdict
The legal outcome and the "Hate Crime" verdict
Despite the defense's insistence on the non-binary label, it didn't stop the hammer from falling. In June 2023, Aldrich pleaded guilty to five counts of first-degree murder and 46 counts of attempted murder. Crucially, they also pleaded "no contest" to the hate crime charges.
The judge, Michael McHenry, didn't hold back during the sentencing. He noted that the shooter’s actions were clearly designed to strike fear into the LGBTQ+ community. The "was the Colorado shooter trans" debate became almost irrelevant to the final judgment because the court focused on the intent of the violence.
The shooter was sentenced to five consecutive life sentences without the possibility of parole, plus over 2,200 years for the attempted murder and hate crime charges. Later, in 2024, they received even more life sentences in a federal plea deal to avoid the death penalty.
Why the question of identity matters for SEO and public perception
When people search for whether the Colorado shooter was trans, they are often looking for a "gotcha" moment. If the shooter was trans, it complicates the narrative about right-wing extremism. If the shooter wasn't trans, it reinforces the idea that the claim was a malicious legal stunt.
The reality is probably the latter, but we have to be careful about how we define these things. In the eyes of the law, a defendant can claim any identity they want. However, a person's history, their digital footprint, and the testimony of those who knew them carry more weight in the court of public opinion.
💡 You might also like: How Old is CHRR? What People Get Wrong About the Ohio State Research Giant
- Online footprint: Aldrich spent time on "Bunker" boards and other sites known for "edgelord" humor.
- Zero prior history: No records of name changes, hormone therapy, or even casual social transitioning exist prior to the arrest.
- Victim impact: Survivors like Michael Anderson, who was bartending that night, have been vocal about believing the non-binary claim was a "disgusting" attempt to evade responsibility.
The broader impact on the LGBTQ+ community
This case was a nightmare for trans people across the country. Whenever a high-profile crime involves someone who identifies—or claims to identify—as trans or non-binary, it is often used as political fodder. In this case, the shooter's claim was used by some pundits to argue that "the community is attacking itself," which ignored the clear evidence of radicalization and hate speech in the shooter's past.
It creates a "boy who cried wolf" scenario. When someone uses a marginalized identity as a shield, it makes it harder for actual marginalized people to be taken seriously by the legal system.
What we know for sure now
If you are looking for a definitive answer, here it is: Anderson Lee Aldrich claimed to be non-binary through their lawyers after being arrested for a mass shooting at a gay bar. However, the prosecution, the survivors, and the evidence of their own online life suggest this was a facade.
The shooter is currently serving their life sentences in a federal prison. Interestingly, even in the federal system, the debate over their identity continues to be a point of friction, but it hasn't changed the nature of their incarceration or the severity of their punishment.
Practical steps for following this story
If you're trying to stay informed on how these types of cases are handled, or if you're researching the intersection of hate crimes and identity, here is what you should do:
- Check the court transcripts directly: Don't rely on 280-character tweets. Look for the "Statement of Facts" in the federal plea agreement. It lays out exactly what the FBI found on the shooter's computer.
- Follow local Colorado journalism: Outlets like The Colorado Sun and The Gazette covered every day of the trial. They have nuances that national news often misses.
- Understand "No Contest" vs. "Guilty": In the state case, the shooter pleaded "no contest" to the hate crimes. This means they accepted the punishment without technically admitting they were motivated by bias, a common legal maneuver.
- Monitor the federal Bureau of Prisons: If the shooter's status ever officially changes within the prison system regarding their housing or medical care, it will be a matter of public record, though privacy laws are strict.
The Club Q shooting remains a scar on the Colorado Springs community. While the shooter tried to mudy the waters with questions about gender identity, the legal system eventually focused on the bodies left on the floor and the hateful ideology that put the gun in the shooter's hand.