/killer-moms-8-57241edc13e843de98ea5e288ae135da.jpg)
The name Susan Smith still carries a heavy, visceral weight in the American psyche. If you grew up in the nineties, you likely remember the grainy footage of a distraught mother pleading for the return of her two young sons, Michael and Alex. You probably also remember the collective gasp when the truth came out: she had rolled her car into John D. Long Lake with the boys strapped inside. For thirty years, she was a fixture of true crime documentaries and legal textbooks. But late in 2024, the conversation shifted from her past to her future. People started asking one specific, loaded question: Was Susan Smith paroled? The short answer is no.
She isn't out. On November 20, 2024, a seven-member parole board in South Carolina sat down to decide if the woman who committed one of the most infamous crimes of the 20th century deserved to walk free. They didn't take long to decide. In fact, the deliberation felt almost lightning-fast compared to the decades of waiting. They denied her request unanimously.
The 2024 Parole Hearing: What Actually Happened
Walking into that hearing, the odds were never in her favor. In South Carolina, parole for a double-murder conviction—especially one involving children—is an incredibly high mountain to climb. Smith appeared via video link from the Leath Correctional Institution. She was 53 years old. She cried. She spoke about her regret. "I love my children with all my heart," she reportedly told the board.
But the board wasn't just looking at her tears. They were looking at her record.
Prison life hasn't been a quiet affair for Susan Smith. Over the last three decades, she racked up a series of disciplinary infractions that became public fodder during the lead-up to the hearing. We're talking about things like drug use and sexual trysts with correctional officers. More recently, reports surfaced that she had been communicating with a documentary filmmaker, allegedly discussing how she might be portrayed—and potentially compensated—if she were released. That kind of behavior doesn't exactly scream "rehabilitated" to a parole board.
The victim impact statements were, as expected, devastating. David Smith, the boys' father, stood before the board to ensure his sons weren't forgotten. He has spent thirty years carrying a burden no parent should ever know. His brother and other family members joined him, urging the board to keep Susan behind bars for the duration of her life sentence. Their testimony focused on the fact that while Susan gets to age and have a voice, Michael and Alex remained three and fourteen months old forever.
Why Parole Was Even an Option
You might wonder why she was even eligible. It feels weird, right? Under South Carolina law at the time of her 1995 conviction, a person sentenced to life in prison for murder was eligible for a parole hearing after serving 30 years. It wasn't a guarantee of release—just a guarantee of a hearing.
Because she was convicted before the state changed its "truth in sentencing" laws, she hit that 30-year milestone in November 2024. If she had been convicted a few years later, she likely wouldn't have had the chance to even ask. This legal loophole created a media firestorm. For months, news outlets were buzzing with the possibility that she could actually walk.
The Argument for Release (and why it failed)
Smith’s supporters—and yes, she does have a small circle of people who believe she has served enough time—point to her mental state at the time of the murders. The 1995 trial was a masterclass in psychological expert testimony. Her defense team, led by David Bruck, argued she was suicidal and intended to die with her children. They painted a picture of a woman broken by a history of sexual abuse and abandonment.
But here’s the thing.
The parole board isn't a jury. They aren't re-trying the case. Their job is to assess current risk and whether the "debt to society" has been paid. Given the nature of the crime—a premeditated act that involved a long, agonizing death for two toddlers—the board found that the gravity of the offense outweighed any claims of rehabilitation.
Life Inside Leath Correctional
Susan Smith hasn't exactly been a model prisoner. This is a crucial detail that many people miss when they talk about whether she'll ever get out.
To get parole in a high-profile case, you basically need a pristine record. Smith’s file is anything but. She has been disciplined for:
- Using illegal drugs behind bars.
- Engaging in sexual acts with guards (two of whom were prosecuted).
- Having unauthorized contact with the media.
These aren't just minor "oops" moments. They suggest a pattern of trying to manipulate the system and a failure to follow the most basic rules of the institution. When the board looked at those files, they saw someone who still struggled with boundaries and social norms.
The Public Outcry and the "Satanic Panic" Legacy
It is hard to overstate how much the 1994 disappearance of the Smith boys changed America. Before the truth came out, Susan claimed a Black man had carjacked her and kidnapped her children. This ignited racial tensions and led to a massive, misguided manhunt.
When she finally confessed, the betrayal felt personal to the millions of people who had prayed for her. That's why the 2024 hearing wasn't just a legal procedure; it was a cultural event. People who weren't even born in 1994 were tweeting about it. The collective memory of her deception makes her one of the most unsympathetic figures in the U.S. penal system.
What Happens Now?
So, Susan Smith wasn't paroled. Is that the end of it? Not quite.
Under South Carolina law, she is entitled to a new parole hearing every two years. This means she will likely be back in front of the board in late 2026. However, the precedent has been set. Unless she shows a miraculous transformation in her behavior and manages to secure some form of institutional support that she currently lacks, her chances of a different outcome are slim.
David Smith has vowed to be at every single hearing. He has made it his life’s mission to ensure she remains incarcerated. In the true crime world, we often talk about "closure," but for the families involved, these two-year cycles of parole hearings are more like a recurring wound. They have to relive the worst moments of their lives on camera, every couple of years, just to keep a killer in a cell.
The Legal Landscape for "Life" Sentences
Susan Smith's case highlights a weird quirk in how we handle life sentences. In many states, "Life" doesn't actually mean until you die. It’s a term of art.
- Life with Parole: You get a hearing after a set number of years (15, 20, 25, or 30).
- Life without Parole (LWOP): You die in prison, period.
- Truth in Sentencing: Laws that require inmates to serve at least 85% of their time.
Smith is in the first category only because of when her crime occurred. Most modern double-murderers would be looking at LWOP, meaning no hearings, no cameras, and no hope for release.
Actionable Steps for Following the Case
If you are tracking this case or similar high-profile parole movements, here is how you can stay informed without falling for the "clickbait" trap:
1. Check the Official Inmate Portal
Don't rely on social media rumors. The South Carolina Department of Corrections (SCDC) has an "Inmate Search" tool. You can see her current location, her disciplinary record, and any scheduled hearing dates. It’s the most boring but most accurate source of truth.
2. Follow Local Reporters
National news tends to swoop in only for the "big" moments. Local journalists in Columbia and Union, South Carolina, have been covering this for thirty years. They understand the nuances of the state's parole board and the local sentiment much better than a talking head in New York.
3. Understand the "Criteria for Parole"
If you want to know why she was denied, look up the South Carolina Code of Laws Section 24-21-640. It lists the factors the board must consider. It includes things like the prisoner's "likelihood to remain at liberty without violating the law" and whether release would "depreciate the seriousness of the offense."
💡 You might also like: Regina Higuera: Why This Grandmother Chose Self-Deportation to Mexico
4. Watch the Victims' Rights Groups
Organizations like Parents of Murdered Children (POMC) often provide updates on how these hearings affect the families. They offer a perspective that focuses on the long-term impact of crime, which is often lost in the "will-she-or-won't-she" media circus.
Susan Smith remains incarcerated at the Leath Correctional Institution. While she will continue to have the right to ask for her freedom, the 2024 hearing made one thing very clear: the state of South Carolina isn't ready to turn the page on this story. For now, the answer to the question of her release is a firm, unanimous no.