Wait, did Elon Musk’s satellites actually have a hand in the 2024 results? If you’ve been scrolling through Threads, X, or TikTok lately, you've probably seen the wild theories. People are literally claiming that Starlink "uploaded" votes in swing states or swapped tallies in mid-air. It sounds like something out of a techno-thriller, right? But if we’re being honest, the reality of how was Starlink used in the election is a lot more "IT support" and a lot less "international super-spy."
Here is the deal: Starlink was present in some capacity, but not where the conspiracy theorists think it was.
The "Air-Gapped" Wall: Why Satellites Can't Touch Your Vote
Most people don't realize how disconnected our voting machines actually are. We live in a world where our fridges are on Wi-Fi, so it’s easy to assume a ballot box is too. It's not. In the US, the machines that actually count your vote—the tabulators—are almost universally "air-gapped."
This is a fancy tech term that basically means they aren't connected to the internet. Period. No Wi-Fi, no Ethernet, and definitely no satellite link to a SpaceX constellation. Mike Hassinger, a spokesperson for the Georgia Secretary of State, was pretty blunt about it, calling the idea that Starlink was used for tabulation "utter garbage." In states like Georgia and North Carolina, it is actually against the law to connect these machines to a network.
Think about the logistics for a second. To change a vote via Starlink, you’d first have to get the voting machine online. But these machines don't even have the hardware to talk to a satellite dish. They are offline islands. When the polls close, poll workers take physical memory cards, pop them into secure bags with tamper-evident ties, and drive them to a central office. It’s old-school. It’s slow. And it’s surprisingly hard to hack from space.
Where Starlink Actually Showed Up
Okay, so if it wasn't counting votes, what was it doing? Starlink actually played a massive role in logistics and disaster recovery.
Remember the hurricanes? Helene and Milton absolutely trashed the infrastructure in parts of North Carolina and Florida just weeks before the election. Fiber lines were ripped out of the ground. Cell towers were down. In those spots, the government and SpaceX scrambled to get Starlink terminals to polling places so poll workers could perform basic office tasks.
- Electronic Poll Books: This is the big one. These are the tablets used to check your ID and make sure you're registered. They do need the internet to sync up so you can't vote at one precinct and then drive ten miles to vote at another.
- Tulare County, California: This is a real-world example people kept pointing to. The registrar there used Starlink because the rural parts of the county have terrible broadband. They used the satellites for "voter check-in purposes only."
- Arizona Pilot Programs: Counties like Coconino and Apache used Starlink to make sure rural, underserved areas could stay connected for administrative work.
So, was Starlink used in the election? Yes. Was it used to decide the election? No. It was basically a very expensive, very fast hotspot for the people checking your name off a list.
Debunking the "Satellite Explosion" Myth
One of the weirder rumors that took off was that Starlink satellites were "exploding" after the election to "destroy the evidence." It’s a great story, but it’s just basic physics being misread.
👉 See also: Finding What is 4 Miles From Me: Why Proximity Search is Getting Smarter
Starlink satellites are designed to be "disposable." They have a low orbit, and when they reach the end of their life—or if they malfunction—they are programmed to de-orbit and burn up in the atmosphere. This happens all the time. In fact, it happens almost every day. People saw fireballs in the sky around November, filmed them on their iPhones, and assumed it was a cover-up.
In reality, astrophysicists like Jonathan McDowell from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics have pointed out that these re-entries are totally routine. There's no "evidence" on a satellite anyway. The data is processed on the ground. A satellite is just a mirror in the sky; it doesn't store your "swapped" vote like a hard drive in a safe.
Why the Claims Persist
Politics is messy. When people are surprised by an outcome, they look for a "Deus Ex Machina"—a technical explanation for why things didn't go their way.
The "Starlink stole it" narrative is just the 2024 version of the "Italian satellites" or "German servers" myths from 2020. It's easy to blame a billionaire with a fleet of spaceships because it feels more plausible than complex shifts in voter demographics. But when you talk to the actual election directors—the people in the room with the paper ballots—they all say the same thing: the paper is the proof.
Almost every state uses paper ballots as the primary record. Even if a "satellite" somehow changed a digital tally (which, again, is physically impossible for air-gapped machines), the post-election audits would catch it immediately. You can't hack a piece of paper from a 300-mile altitude.
Actionable Insights for the Next Cycle
If you're worried about tech interference in future elections, here is how you can actually verify things for yourself:
- Volunteer as a Poll Observer: You’ll see exactly how the memory cards are handled and how the machines are kept offline.
- Check Your State's Audit Laws: Look up "Risk-Limiting Audits." Most swing states now perform these, where they manually compare a random sample of paper ballots to the digital totals.
- Follow CISA: The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency is the gold standard for real-time threat updates. They confirmed there was "no evidence of malicious activity" affecting the 2024 integrity.
- Understand "Split-Ticket" Voting: Don't be fooled by the argument that "people voting for a Republican President but a Democratic Senator" is proof of a hack. It’s just how some people vote.
Starlink is a miracle of modern engineering, and it likely saved the day for thousands of voters in hurricane-ravaged zones who wouldn't have been able to check in otherwise. But as far as "rigging" goes? It just wasn't part of the equation.