Was Ed Gein a Necrophilia? The Truth Behind the Plainfield Butcher

When police walked into the cluttered, stench-filled farmhouse of Edward Theodore Gein in November 1957, they weren't just stepping into a crime scene. They were stepping into a nightmare that would rewrite the book on American true crime. People often ask, point-blank, was Ed Gein a necrophilia? It’s a blunt question. It’s also one that gets at the heart of why we’re still obsessed with this quiet handyman from Plainfield, Wisconsin, nearly seventy years later.

The short answer is actually surprising to most people: no, probably not in the way you think.

Gein’s crimes were undeniably gruesome. He was a grave robber. He was a murderer. He turned human skin into upholstery and kept "trophies" that would make a seasoned coroner lose their lunch. But when you dig into the psychiatric evaluations and his own confessions to investigators like Joe Wilimovsky, the picture becomes a lot more complicated than a simple label. Honestly, the reality is much weirder and, in many ways, sadder than the "ghoul" headlines suggested back in the fifties.

What Really Happened in the Plainfield Farmhouse?

To understand why people keep asking if was Ed Gein a necrophilia case, you have to look at what was actually found on his property. It wasn't just bodies. It was a collection. Police found masks made of human faces, chairs covered in skin, and a belt made of nipples. It’s the stuff of The Texas Chain Saw Massacre because, well, that's exactly where Tobe Hooper got the idea.

Gein admitted to digging up graves. He targeted middle-aged women who reminded him of his late, overbearing mother, Augusta. He’d wait for the local obituary to drop, check the age of the deceased, and then head out to the cemetery under a full moon. This happened about 40 times, though he claimed he often "snapped out of it" and left empty-handed. He eventually brought home at least 15 different bodies over several years.

But here is the kicker. Despite all that time spent with the dead, Gein told state psychiatrists at Central State Hospital that he never had sex with the corpses.

Why? Because they "smelled too bad."

That’s a direct detail from his interrogations. It sounds like a dark joke, but for Gein, it was his reality. His obsession wasn't about sexual gratification in a traditional sense. It was about something much more regressive. He wanted to literally become his mother. He was creating a "woman suit" so he could crawl back into the skin of the only person he ever loved—and the person he feared most.

✨ Don't miss: Who Has Trump Pardoned So Far: What Really Happened with the 47th President's List

The Psychological Profile: Why the Necrophilia Label Doesn't Quite Stick

Psychiatrists who spent years with Gein, including Dr. Schubert, found him to be a "sexual pseudo-hermaphrodite." This is an old-school term, but basically, it meant Gein had a profound confusion about his own identity. He didn't want to screw the dead; he wanted to inhabit them.

Strictly speaking, necrophilia is defined as sexual attraction to or sexual contact with dead bodies. If we take Gein at his word—and he was surprisingly candid about things that were far more incriminating—his "fetish" was necro-fetishism or necro-sadism (though the violence mostly happened post-mortem). He was a collector of parts. He was a craftsman of the macabre.

He lived in a state of suspended animation. After Augusta died in 1945, Gein boarded up the rooms she used, keeping them pristine. He lived in a small, filthy kitchen and a bedroom off to the side, while the rest of the house became a shrine. When he started raiding graves, it was an extension of that shrine.

Think about the psychology of that for a second.

It’s a level of isolation most of us can’t even fathom. He was alone on that farm for over a decade. The local townspeople thought he was just a bit "off." They even joked about him having "shrunken heads" from the South Seas. When he told them he did, they laughed. They thought it was a bit. It wasn't a bit.

The Murders: Mary Hogan and Bernice Worden

We can’t talk about the question of was Ed Gein a necrophilia suspect without looking at the two women he actually killed. Most of his "materials" came from the ground, but in 1954 and 1957, he crossed the line into murder.

Mary Hogan ran a local tavern. She was tough, loud, and didn't take any crap. She disappeared in 1954. Gein later admitted to shooting her, though his memory of the event was conveniently "foggy." Then there was Bernice Worden. She owned the local hardware store. When she went missing on a Saturday morning in 1957, her son, a deputy, found Gein’s name on the last receipt in the book.

🔗 Read more: Why the 2013 Moore Oklahoma Tornado Changed Everything We Knew About Survival

When the police went to Gein’s farm to ask about Bernice, they found her in the shed. She was hung from the rafters like a deer.

This is where the distinction between a "serial killer" and a "ghoul" gets blurry. Gein wasn't a prolific murderer like Ted Bundy or John Wayne Gacy. He killed for supplies. He needed a fresh body because the ones he was digging up were too decomposed for his "projects." It’s a chilling, utilitarian view of human life that makes him one of the most unique cases in criminal history.

The Impact on Pop Culture and Misconceptions

The reason the "necrophilia" label stuck in the public consciousness is largely due to the movies. Robert Bloch wrote the novel Psycho while living just a few miles away from Plainfield. He didn't know the full details of the Gein case yet—the trial hadn't happened—but he knew a man had been arrested for weird stuff involving his mother and dead bodies.

Bloch created Norman Bates. Hitchcock turned it into a masterpiece. Suddenly, the "maternal obsession" and "corpse-keeping" were part of the national lexicon.

Then came The Silence of the Lambs. Buffalo Bill is a composite of several killers, but the "skinning" aspect is 100% Ed Gein. Because these fictional characters are often portrayed with a sexualized edge, we project that back onto the real man. We assume that if he was skinning women, there must have been a traditional sexual motive.

But Gein was much more broken than that. He was a man-child who had been psychologically destroyed by a religious fanatic mother who taught him that all women (except her) were "vessels of sin." When she died, his entire world-view collapsed. He didn't know how to be a man, so he tried to be her.

The Trial and the End of the Plainfield Ghoul

Was he fit for trial? Not at first. Gein was found to be mentally incompetent and sent to Central State Hospital for the Criminally Insane. It took ten years of doctors poked and prodding him before he was finally deemed fit to stand trial in 1968.

💡 You might also like: Ethics in the News: What Most People Get Wrong

He was found "not guilty by reason of insanity."

He spent the rest of his life behind bars in mental institutions. By all accounts, he was a model patient. He was quiet, polite, and did his chores. It’s one of the most jarring things about the case—how this man could be a gentle soul in a clinical setting while having a shed full of human remains back home. He died in 1984 of respiratory failure.

Interestingly, his gravestone in the Plainfield Cemetery kept getting vandalized. People would chip off pieces as souvenirs. Eventually, the whole stone was stolen. Now, he lies in an unmarked grave, finally as invisible as he tried to be for most of his life.

Insights for True Crime Enthusiasts

If you’re researching the Gein case or looking into the history of American forensics, it’s vital to separate the Hollywood "slasher" from the actual psychiatric record. Here are a few things to keep in mind when discussing the case:

• Look at the interrogation transcripts: If you can find the primary source documents from the Waushara County Sheriff’s Department, read them. Gein's own voice is hesitant and almost childlike.
• Study the "Transvestism" vs. "Gender Dysphoria" labels: Modern psychologists have re-evaluated Gein through a more contemporary lens. While he didn't fit the standard definition of transgender, his desire to change his physical form was the driving force of his crimes.
• Understand the "Grave Robbing" context: In the 1950s, rural cemeteries weren't as secure as they are now. Gein’s ability to dig up bodies unnoticed for a decade says as much about the era as it does about his stealth.
• Recognize the difference between Necrophilia and Necrophilia-adjacent behaviors: Gein’s case is often used as a primary example of necro-fetishism. He valued the "parts" more than the "person" or the "act."

The story of Ed Gein isn't just a horror story. It’s a case study in what happens when extreme isolation meets a total break from reality. He wasn't the monster under the bed; he was the lonely neighbor who lived on the edge of town and went home to a house full of ghosts.

When you ask was Ed Gein a necrophilia case, the answer leads you down a rabbit hole of 1950s repression, maternal trauma, and a very specific kind of madness that we’re still trying to wrap our heads around today. To get a deeper understanding of the forensic side of these cases, you might want to look into the works of Harold Schechter, particularly his book Deviant, which is widely considered the definitive account of Gein's life. Reading the actual psychiatric reports from his time at Mendota Mental Health Institute can also provide a clearer picture than any movie ever could.