When you hear the word warfare, what pops into your head? Honestly, for most people, it’s probably a scene out of a movie. You see tanks rolling across a dusty plain, jets screaming through the clouds, or maybe a line of redcoats standing in a field. But that’s a tiny, tiny slice of the pie.
Warfare is basically the organized use of lethal force or intense pressure to get one group of people to do what another group wants. It’s brutal. It's calculated. And lately, it’s getting really weird.
If you look at the way Carl von Clausewitz, that famous Prussian general, described it back in the 1800s, he called it "a mere continuation of policy by other means." That’s a fancy way of saying when talking stops working, the shooting starts. But in 2026, the "shooting" might not even involve bullets. It might be a line of code that shuts down a power grid or a viral misinformation campaign that makes a country tear itself apart from the inside.
What warfare actually looks like today
We used to have these clear lines. There was "war" and there was "peace." You knew which one you were in because there were uniforms and declarations. Now? We live in what experts call the "gray zone."
Take the conflict in Ukraine, for example. Before the first tank even crossed the border in 2022, there was a massive amount of cyber warfare happening. Banks were getting hit. Government websites were being defaced. This is a huge part of what warfare means in the modern era. It’s about degrading the enemy's ability to even think or communicate before the physical fight begins.
It’s also about the economy. Think about sanctions. When a group of countries decides to cut off another country's ability to buy food or sell oil, is that warfare? A lot of scholars, like those at the Brookings Institution, would argue that economic statecraft is just a different flavor of the same thing. You're using a weapon—money—to force a political change.
✨ Don't miss: Who Has Trump Pardoned So Far: What Really Happened with the 47th President's List
The shift to "Small Wars"
Most people think of World War II when they think of warfare. Total mobilization. Millions of men. But that’s actually the outlier. Most of human history is defined by "small wars" or asymmetric warfare. This is where a small, disorganized group (like an insurgency) fights a massive, high-tech army.
It’s messy. There is no front line.
In places like Afghanistan or Vietnam, the definition of warfare shifted. It wasn't about taking a hill; it was about "hearts and minds." If you can't convince the local population to support you, all the drones and missiles in the world won't win the war. This is why cultural intelligence is now considered just as important as satellite imagery in modern military circles.
The technology that's changing the game
We have to talk about AI. It’s not just sci-fi anymore.
Autonomous weapons systems are a massive point of contention at the United Nations right now. We’re talking about drones that can identify and engage targets without a human pulling the trigger. This changes the moral calculus of warfare entirely. If a machine makes a mistake, who goes to jail? Is it the programmer? The general? The machine itself?
🔗 Read more: Why the 2013 Moore Oklahoma Tornado Changed Everything We Knew About Survival
Then there's the "Infowar."
Warfare is increasingly happening on your phone. If you can use algorithms to radicalize a population or spread a fake video that makes a leader look like a monster, you’ve achieved a military objective without firing a single shot. This is "cognitive warfare." It’s the idea that the human mind is the new "domain" of battle, right alongside land, sea, air, and space.
Why we keep doing it
You’d think we’d have stopped by now. We haven't.
Sociologist Charles Tilly once famously said, "War made the state, and the state made war." Basically, the reason we have organized governments today is because they were the only entities capable of taxing people enough to build armies. Warfare is literally baked into the DNA of our modern political systems.
Sometimes it’s about resources—water, oil, lithium for batteries. Other times, it’s purely ideological or religious. But at its core, it’s usually about fear. The fear that if we don't hit them first, they’ll hit us. Or the fear that our way of life is under threat. It's a dark cycle that’s proven incredibly hard to break, even as we become more "civilized."
💡 You might also like: Ethics in the News: What Most People Get Wrong
The Human Cost Nobody Likes to Discuss
We talk about strategy and tactics like it’s a game of chess. It isn't.
Beyond the casualties, there’s the "moral injury." This is a term used by psychologists at the VA to describe the psychological trauma that happens when a soldier has to do something that violates their deepest moral beliefs. Warfare breaks people. Even the winners come home changed.
And then there's the civilian side. Modern warfare is increasingly urban. When a city becomes a battlefield, the distinction between "combatant" and "non-combatant" disappears. According to the International Committee of the Red Cross, civilians now make up the vast majority of casualties in modern conflicts. That is a staggering shift from a century ago.
How to wrap your head around it all
If you're trying to stay informed about what's happening in the world, you can't just look at the news through the lens of "who's winning the battle." You have to look at the layers.
- Check the digital front. Look for spikes in cyberattacks or weirdly synchronized social media trends. That’s often the first sign of a shift in warfare.
- Follow the money. Look at supply chains. If a country is suddenly cut off from the global semiconductor market, that’s a tactical move.
- Listen to the rhetoric. Warfare always starts with language. When leaders start dehumanizing another group, the groundwork for physical conflict is being laid.
Warfare isn't just something that happens "over there" on a map. It’s an evolving, complex, and unfortunately permanent part of the human experience. Understanding it means looking past the explosions and seeing the levers of power, technology, and psychology that are moving underneath the surface.
To really get a handle on this, start by looking at the "Integrated Review" papers published by various governments. They outline how they plan to fight in the future. It’s chilling, but it's the most honest look you'll get at where the world is headed. Pay attention to how they talk about "resilience"—that’s code for how well a society can take a hit and keep going.