Let’s be real for a second. If you grew up in the late 90s, the name "Walking with Dinosaurs" probably conjures up images of Kenneth Branagh’s soothing, serious voice narrating the life and death of a Diplodocus. It was prestige TV. It was high-art science. So, when walking with dinosaurs the movie stomped into theaters in 2013, a lot of us expected that same documentary-style magic, just on a bigger screen.
What we got instead was a talking bird named Alex and a bunch of poop jokes.
It's one of the weirdest stories in modern film history. You have this $80 million production with some of the most stunning, scientifically grounded creature designs of the decade, and then—at the eleventh hour—the studio seemingly panicked. They decided kids wouldn't watch a "silent" movie about animals, so they slapped on telepathic voiceovers that the dinosaurs’ mouths don't even move to match.
The result? A movie that is simultaneously a visual masterpiece and a narrative car crash.
The Great Voiceover Sabotage
The most heartbreaking thing about walking with dinosaurs the movie is that it was originally finished as a "silent" film. And by silent, I mean a naturalistic, documentary-style experience where the animals behaved like animals. No quips. No Justin Long voicing a scrappy Pachyrhinosaurus. Just the raw, brutal reality of the Late Cretaceous.
According to reports from the production and comments from consultants like paleontologist Dr. Thomas R. Holtz Jr., the film was basically done by March 2013 without the dialogue. But the suits at the studio didn't have faith in the audience. They thought it needed "personality."
They hired Justin Long to play Patchi, John Leguizamo to play a prehistoric bird named Alex, and Tiya Sircar as Juniper. They literally wrote a script and recorded it over the finished footage. If you watch the movie closely, the dinosaurs never actually "talk" with their mouths. They just sort of stare at each other while their thoughts beam into your brain like some kind of weird reptilian telepathy.
It’s jarring. It’s kinda annoying. Honestly, it ruins the immersion that the visual team worked so hard to build.
Why the Visuals Actually Rule
If you can manage to hit the mute button (or find the rare "Cretaceous Cut" without the voices), you’ll realize that walking with dinosaurs the movie is actually a triumph of paleo-art.
Most dinosaur movies just give us the "greatest hits"—T. rex, Triceratops, Velociraptor. This movie didn't do that. It focused on the Prince Creek Formation of Alaska, showing us species that usually get ignored by Hollywood.
- Pachyrhinosaurus: Instead of the three-horned Triceratops, we got these thick-nosed herbivores with massive, rugose bosses on their snouts.
- Gorgosaurus: Instead of the T. rex, we got its smaller, faster, and arguably meaner cousin.
- Hesperonychus: Tiny, feathered dromaeosaurs that actually looked like birds instead of naked lizards.
- Troodon: Portrayed as intelligent, nocturnal hunters with feathers—exactly what the science was screaming for at the time.
The backgrounds were filmed on location in Alaska and New Zealand. This wasn't just a green-screen mess. They used James Cameron’s Fusion 3D technology to blend the CGI animals into real, rugged environments. When a Gorgosaurus steps into a river, the water displacement looks real because, well, the river was real.
The character designs were ahead of their time, too. They embraced feathers. They embraced speculative coloring that wasn't just "shades of brown mud." For a film released in 2013, it was significantly more accurate than Jurassic World, which came out two years later and still insisted on scaly, featherless raptors.
The Box Office Reality Check
Despite the $80 million budget and the massive BBC brand name, the movie didn't exactly set the world on fire. It opened in 8th place with a measly $7 million in the US.
By the time it left theaters, it had pulled in about $126 million worldwide. That sounds like a lot, but after marketing costs and the theater owners' cut, it was a dud. Most critics absolutely mauled it. Not because of the animation—everyone loved the animation—but because the dialogue was so juvenile it felt like it was written for toddlers, while the visuals were intense enough to actually scare those same toddlers.
It was a movie caught between two identities. Was it an educational documentary or a wacky road-trip comedy? By trying to be both, it ended up being neither.
How to Actually Enjoy It Today
Look, if you want to experience walking with dinosaurs the movie the way it was meant to be seen, you have to be a bit picky about how you watch it.
The "Cretaceous Cut" is the holy grail here. It removes the voiceovers entirely. No jokes about "pecking turkey things." No weird romantic subplots between dinosaurs. Just the score, the sound effects, and the visuals. When you watch it that way, it transforms into a beautiful, tragic, and soaring look at life 70 million years ago.
👉 See also: Cruel Intentions Movie Synopsis: Why This 90s Classic Still Feels So Dangerous
It’s also worth noting that the film includes these "freeze-frame" moments where a narrator explains the name and diet of each new species. While some critics hated these interruptions, they actually provide a nice bridge to the original series' educational roots. It makes the movie feel like a museum exhibit brought to life.
Actionable Tips for Dino Fans:
- Seek out the "Cretaceous Cut": It's often included as a bonus feature on the Blu-ray or available on certain digital platforms. It is 100% the superior version.
- Watch for the feathers: Pay attention to the Troodons and Hesperonychus. This was one of the first big-budget movies to get the "bird-like" look of small theropods right.
- Ignore the "ninjas" line: There’s a joke about ninjas in the theatrical cut. Just... pretend it didn't happen.
- Compare it to Prehistoric Planet: If you want to see where this style of filmmaking eventually led, watch the Apple TV+ series Prehistoric Planet. It’s basically what this movie could have been if the studio hadn't blinked.
At the end of the day, walking with dinosaurs the movie is a cautionary tale about studio interference. It’s a gorgeous piece of paleo-media buried under a layer of unnecessary "marketing-approved" fluff. But if you can look past the talking birds, there is a prehistoric world waiting for you that is still, over a decade later, one of the most realistic ever put on film.
To get the most out of your rewatch, try to view it as a silent film with a high-budget orchestral score. Focus on the muscle movements of the Pachyrhinosaurus and the lighting of the Alaskan wilderness. You’ll see a completely different, and much better, movie.