Politics is usually a blood sport. We’ve grown so used to the shouting, the interruptions, and the thinly veiled contempt that when the 2024 vice presidential debate actually happened on October 1, the vibe felt... weird. It was polite. Kinda civil, even.
If you were looking for a knockout punch, you probably left disappointed. But if you’re trying to figure out the vp debate winner and loser, the answer isn't a simple scorecard. It’s more about who managed to stop the bleeding and who actually moved the needle with those rare, mythical creatures known as "undecided voters."
The Polished Performance of JD Vance
JD Vance walked onto that stage in New York with a massive weight on his shoulders. Honestly, his public image wasn't great. People were still hammering him over those "childless cat lady" comments and his rough start on the campaign trail. He needed to look less like a Twitter warrior and more like a guy you wouldn't mind being a heartbeat away from the Resolute Desk.
And he did it.
The Ohio Senator was, by most accounts, incredibly slick. He didn't take the bait when moderators Margaret Brennan and Norah O'Donnell tried to fact-check him on immigration. He didn't lose his cool. Instead, he calmly explained his "CBP One" app theories and even apologized to Tim Walz when the Minnesota Governor mentioned his son witnessing a shooting.
That specific moment of empathy? It was a huge win for Vance's "likability" metrics. You could almost hear the GOP strategists exhaling. According to a CNN/SSRS flash poll taken immediately after the event, 51% of viewers thought Vance had the better night.
👉 See also: Why are US flags at half staff today and who actually makes that call?
He didn't just survive; he rebranded.
Tim Walz and the Nervous Start
On the other side of the stage, Tim Walz looked like a guy who had spent too much time in a windowless room with a briefing book. He was visibly nervous. He was scribbling notes so fast his pen probably needed a cooling system.
The biggest "loser" moment for Walz came when he had to answer for his previous claims about being in Hong Kong during the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests. The truth? He didn't get there until months later.
"I'm a knucklehead at times," Walz said, trying to laugh it off. It was a classic "Midwestern dad" defense, but in the high-stakes world of a national debate, it felt like a stumble. He spent the first twenty minutes looking for his footing while Vance was already sprinting.
However, Walz found his groove later on. When the topic shifted to abortion and healthcare, he sounded much more like the coach people liked. He hammered the "Project 2025" talking points and forced Vance onto the defensive regarding Donald Trump’s stance on the 2020 election results.
✨ Don't miss: Elecciones en Honduras 2025: ¿Quién va ganando realmente según los últimos datos?
The 2020 Election: A Late-Game Shift
If Vance won the first half on style, Walz arguably won the final minutes on substance. He asked Vance a direct question: "Did Donald Trump lose the 2020 election?"
Vance dodged. He pivoted to talking about "censorship at an industrial scale."
Walz pounced, calling it a "damning non-answer." For Democrats, this was the highlight of the night. It reminded voters why they were worried about the Trump-Vance ticket in the first place. This exchange is why many analysts hesitate to name a definitive vp debate winner and loser—it depends entirely on whether you value rhetorical skill or democratic principles more.
What the Numbers Actually Say
Let's look at the data because feelings are fickle.
- CBS News Poll: 42% said Vance won; 41% said Walz won. Basically a statistical tie.
- YouGov Tracking: Vance saw a massive 19-point jump in his favorability ratings post-debate.
- Independents: Both candidates actually improved their standing with independent voters, which is rare.
Vance proved he is a formidable debater. He's fast. He's clear. He knows how to frame a "peace through strength" argument without sounding like he's itching for a fight. Walz proved he's human—sometimes to a fault—but also that he can speak to the "common man" in a way that feels authentic, even when he's fumbling his words.
🔗 Read more: Trump Approval Rating State Map: Why the Red-Blue Divide is Moving
The Reality of the "Winner" Label
Historically, VP debates don't change elections. Remember Lloyd Bentsen telling Dan Quayle he was "no Jack Kennedy"? It was a legendary burn, but Bentsen still lost the election.
The vp debate winner and loser conversation usually fades within forty-eight hours. What sticks is the "vibe." Vance successfully lowered his "creepy" factor (his words, effectively). Walz maintained his "good guy" status despite the "knucklehead" moments.
If you’re looking for a winner, look at the polling averages in Pennsylvania and Michigan. If they didn't move an inch, then the true "winner" was probably the status quo. Both men did exactly what they were sent there to do: shore up the base and prove they belonged on the stage.
Actionable Insights for the Next Phase
- Watch the pivots: Both candidates showed how to dodge a direct question by reframing it. It's a masterclass in media training.
- Civility works: The fact that both men shook hands and were respectful actually played well with the public. Expect to see more "polite" attacks in the future.
- Check the fact-checks: Don't take the stage performance at face value. Dig into the specifics of the "CBP One" app and the "pregnancy registry" claims to see where the truth actually lies.
Voters often decide based on who they'd rather have a beer with versus who they'd trust with a crisis. On that night in October, Vance made a strong case for the latter, while Walz doubled down on the former.