Everyone thought 2024 would be the "big one." The election to end all elections. After the absolute madness of 2020, where people stood in six-hour lines during a global pandemic to hit a record-shattering 66.6% turnout, the expectations for 2024 were sky-high. Some pundits predicted we’d blow past 70%. Others thought we’d see a massive drop-off from "election fatigue."
So, what actually happened?
The final voter turnout 2024 percentage settled in at approximately 64.1% of the voting-eligible population (VEP).
That’s a small dip from 2020, sure. But don't let that fool you into thinking people stayed home. Honestly, this was still the second-highest turnout for a presidential election since 1960. We’re living through a weirdly high-engagement era of American politics. Even with the slight slide, over 158 million people cast a ballot. That is a staggering amount of humans.
Breaking Down the Voter Turnout 2024 Percentage by State
If you look at the national average, you miss the real story. America isn't a monolith; it's more like 50 different elections happening at the same time. While the national average was 64.1%, the gaps between states were massive.
Minnesota did what Minnesota always does—it crushed everyone else. They hit a 76.4% turnout rate. Wisconsin was right behind them at 76.6% (depending on which final certification you're looking at, they basically neck-and-neck). It makes sense. If you live in a "Blue Wall" state where every single door-knock feels like the fate of the universe is at stake, you’re probably going to show up.
On the flip side, Oklahoma and West Virginia sat right around 53% to 55%.
💡 You might also like: Brian Walshe Trial Date: What Really Happened with the Verdict
There’s a clear "Swing State Premium." In the seven states that actually decided the Electoral College—places like Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Arizona—the average turnout was closer to 70%. People in battlegrounds know their vote carries a heavier mathematical weight. If you live in a "deep red" or "deep blue" state, the motivation feels... different. Kinda less urgent for some.
The Swing State Surge vs. The Safe State Slump
Take a look at the "Big Three" in the Rust Belt:
- Wisconsin: 76.4%
- Michigan: 74.6%
- Pennsylvania: 71.4%
Compare that to California, which saw a turnout of roughly 62.1%. Or Texas at 56.6%. When an election is a foregone conclusion in your zip code, it’s harder to get excited. Interestingly, the Census Bureau’s final 2025 reports noted that even though registration was up, the "follow-through" varied wildly based on how much TV advertising people were subjected to.
Who Actually Showed Up?
This is where it gets spicy. The demographics of the voter turnout 2024 percentage tell a story of a shifting electorate. For years, the "Demographic is Destiny" crowd thought higher turnout would always favor Democrats.
2024 proved that's basically a myth now.
The Trump campaign focused heavily on "low-propensity voters." These are people who don't usually vote—men without college degrees, younger guys who feel disconnected from politics, and certain segments of the Hispanic community. And guess what? It worked.
📖 Related: How Old is CHRR? What People Get Wrong About the Ohio State Research Giant
According to Pew Research, among voters who skipped 2020 but showed up in 2024, Trump won them by a margin of 54% to 42%. He didn't just win the people who always vote; he won the people who were previously "too bored" to care.
Age and Gender Gaps
The "Silver Tsunami" is still real. If you’re over 65, you probably voted. Nearly 72% of that age group showed up. Meanwhile, the 18-24 crowd sat at a much lower 45-50% range. It's a tale as old as time, but the gap is widening.
Interestingly, women continued their 40-year streak of out-voting men. Roughly 61% of eligible women voted compared to about 57% of men. But the way they voted shifted. The "gender gap" in turnout didn't save the Harris campaign because the "partisan gap" among those who did show up moved toward the right, especially among men under 50.
The Death of the "Election Day" Tradition?
We’re not really an "Election Day" country anymore. We’re an "Election Month" country. In 2024, only about 37% of people actually walked into a booth on Tuesday, November 5.
The rest?
- 35.2% voted early in person.
- 30.3% used mail-in ballots.
This is a huge change from the pre-COVID days. In 2018, only about 16% of people voted early. Now, it’s the standard. Even though mail-in voting dropped from its 2020 peak (where it was 43%), the "Early In-Person" option has exploded. Republicans, who were previously skeptical of early voting, leaned into it hard this time around. The "Bank the Vote" strategy definitely played a role in keeping that 2024 percentage as high as it was.
👉 See also: The Yogurt Shop Murders Location: What Actually Stands There Today
Why Didn't We Hit 2020 Levels?
You might be wondering why, with all the drama, we didn't beat the 66.6% record. Honestly, 2020 was an anomaly. You had a captive audience—everyone was stuck at home with nothing to do but watch news and mail in a ballot.
By 2024, life was back to normal. People had jobs to go to, kids to drop off, and a general sense of "I've seen this movie before." There was also a notable drop in turnout among certain urban centers. Places like Philadelphia and Detroit saw slightly lower raw numbers than expected, which suggests that "voter enthusiasm" isn't just about hating the other side—it's about liking your own side enough to get off the couch.
Also, we can't ignore "voter list maintenance." States have become much more aggressive about cleaning up their rolls. The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) reported that states sent out nearly 40 million confirmation notices to check if people had moved or died. When the "denominator" (the list of registered voters) gets cleaner, the percentage might look lower even if the raw number of humans is still high.
What This Means for the Future
The voter turnout 2024 percentage confirms that we are in a high-stakes, high-participation era. The floor for turnout used to be in the 50s. Now, it seems like the "new normal" is the mid-60s.
If you're looking for actionable insights from these numbers, here's what the data actually tells us:
- Don't ignore the "infrequent" voter. Campaigns that only talk to "likely voters" are going to lose. 2024 was decided by people who don't follow politics on Twitter.
- Early voting is the new Election Day. If you're organizing anything—a local bond measure or a school board race—you need to have your "get out the vote" (GOTV) operation ready a month before the actual date.
- The "Gender Gap" isn't a silver bullet. While women vote more, their internal shifts (like the 51% of naturalized Hispanic women voting for Trump) show that you can't treat them as a single voting bloc.
- Localize your efforts. National trends are fun for pundits, but the real action is in the state-level data. If you want to move the needle, look at why states like West Virginia are sitting at 55% while their neighbors are 15 points higher.
The 2024 cycle proved that the American electorate is volatile, engaged, and increasingly difficult to predict using old-school models. We didn't hit a new record, but we stayed in the stratosphere. In a world of infinite distractions, getting 158 million people to agree to do the same thing on the same day is kind of a miracle.
If you want to dive deeper into your specific county's numbers, the UF Election Lab and the Census Bureau's Voting and Registration tables are the gold standards for raw data. Check them out if you want to see exactly how your neighbors showed up.