So, you think you found a Van Gogh? Honestly, you aren’t alone. Every year, dozens of people reach out to major museums or auction houses convinced they’ve stumbled upon a lost treasure in an attic or a dusty corner of a thrift shop. But when it comes to van gogh sketchbook submissions, the reality is a bit of a heartbreaker. It’s a world of high-stakes forensics, intense academic gatekeeping, and, more often than not, a lot of very old, very sincere disappointment.
The Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam gets hundreds of inquiries. People send photos of yellowing paper, sketches of sunflowers, or messy, impulsive landscapes that look "just like Vincent." Most of these are rejected almost immediately. Why? Because the bar for entry isn't just high—it’s nearly atmospheric.
The Brutal Reality of Authenticating a Sketchbook
Most people don't realize that Vincent van Gogh was incredibly methodical about his materials. He didn't just grab any scrap of paper. He had specific preferences for certain types of wove paper, specific inks like iron gall or bistre, and very particular charcoal sticks. When experts look at van gogh sketchbook submissions, they aren't just looking at the "vibe" of the drawing. They are looking at the molecular structure of the ink and the way the paper fibers have aged over 130 years.
Take the 2016 controversy involving the "Lost Arles Sketchbook." This wasn't just some random person on the street; it was a collection of 65 drawings presented by reputable scholars. Even then, the Van Gogh Museum rejected it. They pointed out that the ink color—a distinctive brownish hue—didn't match the chemical degradation patterns found in Vincent’s known 1888-1890 works. They also found linguistic "anachronisms" in the way the notebook was labeled. It was a massive, public scholarly brawl.
If a group of experts with 65 drawings can’t get past the front door, it gives you an idea of what an individual collector is up against.
The Paper Trail Matters More Than the Art
Provenance. It's a fancy word that basically means "where has this thing been for the last century?" For a submission to be taken seriously, it needs a rock-solid history. Vincent’s brother, Theo, and Theo’s wife, Jo van Gogh-Bonger, were meticulous. They cataloged almost everything. If a sketchbook suddenly appears in 2026 without a clear line of ownership tracing back to the Van Gogh family, or at least a known contemporary like Paul Gauguin or Dr. Gachet, the experts are going to be skeptical. Really skeptical.
Think about it this way: Vincent was poor, but he wasn't anonymous. His circle was small. He sent his sketches to Theo in bundles. He traded them with fellow artists like Émile Bernard. He left them with innkeepers. Most of those "abandoned" works were tracked down decades ago.
🔗 Read more: Finding the Right United States Map with States Labeled for Your Project
How the Van Gogh Museum Handles Submissions
The process isn't like Antiques Roadshow. You don't just walk in. The Van Gogh Museum has a very specific, tiered approach to "requests for authentication."
First off, they won't even look at it if you're trying to sell it through them. They are a research and preservation institution, not a gallery. Usually, the process starts with a digital review. You send high-resolution photos and every bit of paperwork you have. Most van gogh sketchbook submissions end right here. A curator can often tell within seconds if the style is "after Van Gogh" (meaning a student or admirer copied him) or a flat-out forgery.
If—and this is a huge if—the work looks promising, it moves to physical examination. This involves:
- Raking Light Analysis: They shine a light at a shallow angle to see the texture of the paper and the pressure of the pencil or pen. Vincent had a very aggressive, physical way of drawing.
- Micro-XRF Scanning: This identifies the chemical elements in the ink or pencil lead without touching the artwork.
- Comparison with "The Letters": Vincent wrote thousands of letters. He often described exactly what he was drawing. If a sketch appears that matches a description in a letter to Theo, its chances of being real skyrocket.
The "Copycat" Problem
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Van Gogh became a rockstar. Naturally, people started copying him. Some were just fans. Others were scammers. There are thousands of "lookalike" sketches circulating in the world today. Many were even done on period-accurate paper. This is why the museum is so defensive. One wrong authentication can ruin the museum's reputation and skew the entire art historical record. It's a heavy burden.
What to Do If You Actually Have Something
Okay, let's say you've found a notebook. It’s got that jittery, energetic line work. The paper looks right. The subjects are cypress trees or peasants in boots. What's the actual move?
Don't just email the Van Gogh Museum immediately. You'll likely get a form rejection because they are overwhelmed. Start with a local university’s art history department or a reputable, independent appraiser who specializes in 19th-century European art. You need someone who isn't afraid to tell you "no."
Honestly, most of the time, what people find are lithographs or high-quality prints from the 1920s. These can look remarkably like original sketches to the untrained eye. Use a magnifying glass. If you see a pattern of tiny dots, it’s a print. If the ink sits on top of the paper fibers and has a slight sheen or variation in thickness, you might actually have a drawing.
Actionable Steps for Potential Submissions
If you are serious about pursuing a van gogh sketchbook submission, follow this checklist. Don't skip steps. It saves everyone time and keeps you from getting your hopes up for no reason.
- Examine under 10x magnification. Look for those "halftone dots." If you see them, it's a reproduction.
- Document the provenance. Write down every single thing you know about where the item came from. Did your Great-Aunt Mary live in Paris in the 1930s? Did she buy it from a specific estate?
- Check the "Catalogue Raisonné." This is the definitive list of all known works by an artist. Consult the works of J.B. de la Faille or Jan Hulsker. If your sketch looks exactly like a famous painting but isn't in these books, it's likely a later copy by a student.
- Hire an independent researcher. Before going to a museum, pay a professional to look for your specific piece in old auction catalogs from the early 1900s.
- Prepare for the "No." Statistically, 99.9% of submissions are not authentic. Even if it is a 19th-century drawing, it might be by a contemporary like Armand Guillaumin or Anthon van Rappard.
The world of Van Gogh is messy and emotional. He was a man who poured his soul onto the page, and it's natural to want to find a piece of that. But the science of authentication is cold and clinical. It doesn't care about the "feel" of the art; it cares about the chemical composition of the ink and the chain of custody. If you're going to dive into the world of van gogh sketchbook submissions, go in with your eyes wide open and your evidence ready.
The best place to start your research isn't a museum's submission portal, but a library. Spend time with the Van Gogh Letters online database. See how he talked about his work. Compare your sketch to his known sketches from the same period. If the handwriting in your notebook doesn't match the distinctive, slanted, often cramped script found in his letters, you probably have your answer right there.