Stop obsessing over the grid. Seriously.
Most people building ux design portfolio websites treat the process like they’re curating an art gallery for a bunch of high-brow critics. They spend weeks tweaking the padding on a button or finding the perfect "aesthetic" mockup for an iPhone 16. It’s a waste of time. Hiring managers at places like Google, Airbnb, or some scrappy startup in Berlin aren't looking for a digital museum. They’re looking for evidence that you aren't going to break their product.
I’ve looked at hundreds of these. Most are carbon copies of each other. You see the same "Double Diamond" diagram. You see the same "Personas" that look like they were generated by a stock photo site. It’s boring. Honestly, it’s worse than boring—it’s invisible.
If you want to actually get an interview, you have to stop following the "Ultimate Guide" templates you found on LinkedIn. You need to show the mess.
The "Perfect Process" Myth in UX Design Portfolio Websites
There’s this weird lie we tell in the industry. We pretend every project follows a linear path from research to wireframes to high-fidelity prototypes. It never happens that way. Real design is a disaster. It’s stakeholders changing their minds at 4:00 PM on a Friday. It's discovering that the API doesn't support the cool feature you spent three days designing.
When you build ux design portfolio websites that only show the "clean" version of the story, you're signaling to senior designers that you’ve never actually worked on a real-world product. They want to see the pivots.
Case in point: Look at Simon Pan’s portfolio. He’s a legend in the space for a reason. His Uber "Magic Eight Ball" case study isn't just a bunch of pretty slides. It’s a long-form narrative. He explains the why. He shows the dead ends. He talks about the friction between the business goals and the user needs. That is what wins.
Why Your Case Studies Are Too Long (and Too Short)
It's a paradox. You’ve probably heard that recruiters only spend 30 seconds on your site. That's true for the first pass. But if they like what they see, they’ll spend twenty minutes digging into the details.
The mistake most people make with their ux design portfolio websites is trying to satisfy both audiences with one giant wall of text. It doesn't work. You need a "skim layer" and a "deep-dive layer."
- The Skim: Bold headers, clear results, and "TL;DR" summaries at the top.
- The Deep Dive: Detailed explanations of your logic, the constraints you faced, and the data that drove your decisions.
If I can't figure out what you specifically did within the first ten seconds, I’m closing the tab. Were you the lead? Did you just do the icons? Tell me.
Stop Using "Standard" Personas
Nothing makes a hiring manager's eyes glaze over faster than a persona named "Sarah the Soccer Mom" who "likes coffee and easy-to-use apps." It tells us nothing. It’s filler.
Real UX work is about behavior, not demographics. Instead of those fluff pieces, show me a "Task Analysis" or a "Mental Model" diagram. Show me how you observed a user struggling to find the "Check Out" button and how that specific observation changed your wireframe.
If your ux design portfolio websites are full of generic personas, you’re basically telling the recruiter that you’re just going through the motions. You’re checking boxes.
Don't check boxes. Solve problems.
The Technical Debt of Portfolio Builders
Let's talk about the actual tech. You've got options: Squarespace, Wix, Webflow, Framer, or custom code.
Framer and Webflow are the current darlings of the design world. They allow for high-end interactions that look incredible. But here is the trap: if you spend sixty hours on a scroll animation and zero hours explaining your user testing methodology, you’ve failed.
I once saw a portfolio that was entirely a 3D environment you had to navigate with WASD keys. It was cool for exactly four seconds. Then it was annoying. I just wanted to see the work. Don't let the "website" get in the way of the "UX."
If you're applying for a UX Engineering role, sure, code it from scratch. If you’re a product designer, just use a tool that stays out of your way. Speed matters. Accessibility matters. If your portfolio site isn't accessible to someone using a screen reader, you’ve basically announced you don't understand the "Universal" part of User Experience.
The Accessibility Irony
It’s kind of wild how many designers talk about empathy but then build portfolios with low-contrast text (light gray on white—why?) and no alt-text for images.
- Check your color contrast.
- Make sure your site works on a phone.
- Ensure your font size isn't 10pt.
A recruiter is probably looking at your site on a 13-inch laptop while sitting in a bright office or on a train. If it’s hard to read, they won't read it. Simple as that.
Your "About Me" Page is a Product Too
People think the "About Me" section is where you talk about your dog and your love for sourdough bread. You can do that, but don't stop there.
Hiring is a risk-mitigation process. The company is terrified of hiring someone who is difficult to work with or who can't take feedback. Use your bio to talk about how you collaborate. Do you enjoy working with developers? Do you know how to talk to product managers?
Basically, you’re selling a teammate, not just a set of Figma skills.
Where Most Portfolios Go to Die: The Conclusion
Most ux design portfolio websites just... stop. The case study ends with a picture of the final UI and maybe a sentence like "I learned a lot about teamwork."
That is the weakest possible way to end.
A great portfolio reflects on the outcome. Did the metrics improve? Did the bounce rate drop by 15%? If the project never launched (which happens a lot), what would you have measured? What would you do differently if you had a $100,000 budget instead of $5,000?
Show some humility. Admit what didn't work. It makes the stuff that did work much more believable.
📖 Related: Ctrl Click on a Mac: Why You Aren't Using Your Mouse Correcty
Immediate Steps to Fix Your Site
If you're looking at your portfolio right now and feeling a bit of dread, good. That means you’re ready to improve it.
First, go through your case studies and delete 50% of the text. Nobody is reading your 3,000-word essay on a weather app. Replace that text with annotated screenshots. Point to a button and write: "We moved this here because 80% of users missed it in the initial prototype." That one sentence is worth more than five paragraphs of "design thinking" jargon.
Second, check your links. It sounds stupidly obvious, but you’d be surprised how many "View Prototype" buttons lead to a 404 page or a private Figma file I can't access.
Third, get a "non-designer" friend to look at your site. Ask them what they think you actually do. If they can’t tell you within a minute, your messaging is too muddy.
The best ux design portfolio websites aren't the ones with the flashiest animations. They are the ones that communicate a clear story of a designer who understands business goals, empathizes with users, and knows how to navigate the messy reality of building software.
Actionable Checklist for Your Next Update
- Kill the "Skills" Progress Bars: No one knows what "80% proficient in Figma" means. It's a meaningless stat. Remove it.
- Highlight Your "Impact" Early: Put the results of your project in the first two paragraphs. Don't make us wait until the end.
- Optimize for Speed: Compress your images. A 5MB PNG of a wireframe is going to kill your site's load time on a mobile connection.
- Write Like a Human: Replace words like "leveraged," "utilized," and "synergy" with "used," "worked with," and "teamwork."
- Show the "Before": If you did a redesign, show the original hot mess. It provides the context needed to appreciate your solution.
Focus on the logic, not just the pixels. That’s how you get hired in 2026. The market is crowded, and "pretty" is now the baseline. "Smart" is the differentiator.
Go through your site today and ask yourself: "Am I showing my work, or am I just showing the results?" If it's the latter, you've got some editing to do.