You’ve probably heard the rumors or seen the late-night TV debates. Someone mentions a US president 3rd term, and suddenly everyone has a "secret theory" about how it could happen. Maybe it's a loophole in the 12th Amendment. Maybe it’s a "national emergency" clause that doesn't actually exist.
Honestly? Most of it is total nonsense.
The rules are actually pretty blunt, but the history behind them is wilder than you’d think. For about 150 years, there wasn't even a law saying you couldn't run forever. We just... didn't. Then came FDR, a massive global crisis, and a constitutional "never again" moment that changed the game in 1951.
The Ghost of FDR and the 22nd Amendment
Before we get into the "can they or can't they" of today, we have to look at the guy who actually did it. Franklin D. Roosevelt didn't just win a third term; he won a fourth.
He was first elected in 1932 during the absolute gutter of the Great Depression. By 1940, with Europe literally on fire and Hitler moving through France, FDR decided that breaking George Washington’s two-term "gentleman's agreement" was necessary for national security. He won. Then, in 1944, in the middle of World War II, he won again.
He died just 11 weeks into that fourth term.
Congress was spooked. Republicans, led by folks like Thomas Dewey (who lost to FDR in '44), argued that four terms—or sixteen years—was the "most dangerous threat to our freedom ever proposed." They weren't just being salty about losing; there was a real fear that a "perpetual president" was just a king with a different title.
So, in 1947, they proposed the 22nd Amendment. It was ratified in 1951. The text is incredibly specific. It says: "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice."
It also adds a weirdly specific math rule: if you take over for someone else (like a VP does) and serve more than two years of their term, you can only be elected one more time.
Basically, the maximum any human can serve is 10 years. Period.
Can a President Serve a 3rd Term via Loopholes?
This is where the internet lawyers start getting creative. You’ll hear people say things like, "What if a two-term president runs for Vice President?"
It's a fascinating legal "maybe."
The 22nd Amendment says you can't be elected president more than twice. But the 12th Amendment says that nobody "constitutionally ineligible" to be president can be Vice President. Legal scholars like Akhil Reed Amar at Yale and Michael Dorf at Cornell have chewed on this for years.
Does "ineligible" mean you don't meet the age/birth requirements (35 years old, natural-born citizen)? Or does it include the 22nd Amendment's "twice-elected" rule?
- The "No" Camp: Most experts say the 12th Amendment blocks this. If you can't be president, you can't be the "heartbeat away" from being president. It’s common sense.
- The "Technically..." Camp: Some argue "eligibility" and "re-electability" are different things. They say the 22nd Amendment only stops you from being elected to the top spot, not from holding it if the person above you resigns.
But let’s be real. If any former president tried this, it would go straight to the Supreme Court faster than you can say "constitutional crisis." And given the originalist leanings of the current court, they’d likely look at the intent of the 22nd Amendment—which was very clearly to stop people from staying in power forever.
Why We Don't Just Change the Law
Could we just get rid of the 22nd Amendment? Sure. Theoretically.
Ronald Reagan actually wanted to do it. He thought it was undemocratic to tell people they couldn't vote for someone they liked just because of a calendar. But the process to change the Constitution is a nightmare.
You need two-thirds of both the House and the Senate to agree. In today’s political climate? You can barely get them to agree on what day it is. Then, you need 38 out of 50 states to ratify it.
We’ve only ever repealed one amendment in the history of the United States—the 18th (Prohibition). It took the 21st Amendment to do it.
Recent "3rd Term" Talk in 2025 and 2026
We’ve seen a recent spike in this conversation. Just this past year, in early 2025, House Joint Resolution 29 (H.J.Res.29) was introduced. It actually proposed letting someone be elected up to three times.
It didn't go anywhere. It's mostly political theater.
Why? Because even if one party thinks it’s a great idea for their guy, they know it’ll eventually be used by the other guy. Term limits are one of the few things that actually have broad, bipartisan support among regular voters. A 2025 Pew Research report showed that while people are frustrated with "career politicians," they are even more wary of concentrated executive power.
The "Acting President" Scenario
There is one way a former two-term president could technically sit in the Oval Office again without an election. It’s the "Designated Survivor" scenario.
If a former president became, say, Secretary of State, and everyone above them in the line of succession died or was incapacitated, they could become "Acting President."
However, even this has a massive roadblock. The Presidential Succession Act of 1947 explicitly mentions that people in the line of succession must meet the constitutional requirements. If the 22nd Amendment makes you "ineligible," the law likely skips you.
💡 You might also like: Dreamland: The True Tale of America's Opiate Epidemic and Why It Still Hits So Hard
Actionable Insights: What You Should Know
If you're following the news or debating this at dinner, keep these hard facts in your back pocket:
- The "Two-Election" Rule: The 22nd Amendment doesn't care if the terms were consecutive or 20 years apart. If you were elected twice, you are done.
- The 10-Year Max: If a VP takes over with 1 year left on a term, they can run twice more. Total = 9 years. If they take over with 3 years left, they can only run once more. Total = 7 years.
- The Repeal Reality: Don't hold your breath for a 28th Amendment. The bar for ratification is too high for the current era of polarized politics.
- Watch the Courts: Any serious attempt to bypass these rules through a VP run or a succession loophole would require a Supreme Court ruling. Until that happens, it’s all just law school fan fiction.
The US president 3rd term remains a historical artifact of the FDR era and a constitutional "hard ceiling." While it makes for great political drama, the legal architecture of the United States is currently built to ensure that once you’ve had your eight (or ten) years, it’s time to head to the library and start writing your memoirs.
If you want to track real-time changes to these laws, your best bet is to monitor the House Judiciary Committee filings or the National Constitution Center's updates on Article V conventions. They track every serious (and non-serious) attempt to tweak the rules of the game.