You’ve probably seen the headlines or heard the heated dinner table debates. Someone mentions US birthright citizenship, and suddenly the room splits. Half the people think it’s a sacred American pillar, while the other half argues it’s a legal relic being exploited. But here is the thing: most of what people shout about is actually wrong.
Basically, if you are born on American soil, you are a citizen. Period. It sounds simple, right? It isn't.
The roots of this concept aren't just in some dusty law book; they are baked into the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. We are talking about a post-Civil War era shift that fundamentally redefined what it meant to be "American." Before 1868, the rules were a mess. After 1868, the rule became: if you’re born here, you belong here.
The Fourteenth Amendment is the Real Boss Here
Let’s get technical for a second, but not too boring. The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
That "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" part is where the lawyers make their money.
Some folks try to argue that this phrase should exclude the children of undocumented immigrants or tourists. They say if your parents owe allegiance to a foreign power, you aren't truly "under the jurisdiction" of the U.S. in a political sense. Honestly, that argument has been around for over a century, and the Supreme Court hasn't really bitten.
Take the case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark in 1898. This is the big one. Wong Kim Ark was born in San Francisco to Chinese parents who were legally residing in the U.S. but were not citizens. When he traveled abroad and tried to come back, the government tried to block him. They claimed he wasn't a citizen because his parents were subjects of the Emperor of China. The Supreme Court basically said, "Nice try, but no." They ruled that birth on U.S. soil—regardless of parental citizenship—grants citizenship, provided the parents aren't foreign diplomats or invading soldiers.
It changed everything.
Why People Keep Arguing About It
Politics. That's the short answer.
🔗 Read more: When is the Next Hurricane Coming 2024: What Most People Get Wrong
You’ll hear terms like "anchor babies" tossed around in the news. It's a polarizing term used to describe children born to non-citizens with the supposed intent of helping the parents secure legal status. However, the reality is way more complicated. Having a baby in the U.S. doesn't give a parent a "get out of jail free" card with ICE. In fact, a U.S. citizen child cannot even sponsor a parent for a green card until that child turns 21. That is a two-decade wait. Not exactly a shortcut.
The "Birth Tourism" Industry
There is a real industry here, though. In cities like Los Angeles and Miami, "maternity hotels" have popped up catering to wealthy families from China, Russia, and Turkey. These families pay tens of thousands of dollars to fly in, give birth, and fly out with a blue passport for their kid.
Is it legal? Technically, yes.
Is it controversial? Absolutely.
Federal agents have raided some of these businesses, but usually on charges of visa fraud or money laundering, not because the birthright itself is illegal. If you lie on your visa application about why you're coming to the U.S., that's a crime. But the act of being born here still triggers the Fourteenth Amendment. It’s a weird legal gray area where the method of getting here might be fraudulent, but the result—the baby’s citizenship—is constitutionally protected.
Looking at the Rest of the World
We are actually in the minority. Only about 30 odd countries—mostly in the Americas like Canada, Mexico, and Brazil—offer jus soli (right of the soil).
Most European and Asian nations follow jus sanguinis (right of blood). In places like Switzerland or Japan, you can be born and raised there, speak the language perfectly, and still not be a citizen because your parents aren't. America’s system is designed to be an integration machine. It’s about turning "them" into "us" in a single generation.
Some argue this is our "secret sauce." It prevents the creation of a permanent underclass of non-citizens who live in a country for generations without a stake in its success. Others argue it's an outdated magnet for illegal immigration.
Can a President Just "End" It?
Every few years, a politician suggests ending US birthright citizenship via executive order. You might remember this coming up in 2018 and again in recent campaign cycles.
💡 You might also like: What Really Happened With Trump Revoking Mayorkas Secret Service Protection
Could it happen? Most constitutional scholars, like Laurence Tribe or even conservative-leaning experts, say no. An executive order cannot overrule the Constitution. To change birthright citizenship, you’d likely need a Constitutional Amendment.
To get that, you need:
- Two-thirds of both the House and the Senate to agree.
- Three-fourths of the State legislatures to ratify it.
In today’s political climate? You have a better chance of seeing a unicorn walk down Wall Street.
The other route is the Supreme Court. A president could sign an order, wait for it to be challenged, and hope the current conservative majority reinterprets the Fourteenth Amendment to exclude those not "subject to the jurisdiction" (meaning children of those here illegally). But even that is a massive "if." The principle of stare decisis—sticking to previous court decisions—is a powerful force, and Wong Kim Ark has stood for 128 years.
The Practical Reality of Being a "Birthright" Citizen
It isn't all just politics; it’s about real lives. Think about the "Dreamers," though they are often a different category (usually born abroad and brought here young). The birthright kids are different. They are 100% American from second one.
They go to school, they pay taxes eventually, and they can run for President. Yes, even the "birth tourism" kids could technically come back at age 35 and run for the Oval Office.
But there are burdens too.
The U.S. is one of the only countries that taxes based on citizenship, not residence. If a child is born in a maternity hotel in Irvine and moves back to Taipei two weeks later, they owe Uncle Sam a tax return every year for the rest of their life, even if they never step foot in the U.S. again. It's called "accidental American" syndrome. Many people actually give up their citizenship later in life to avoid the IRS's long reach.
📖 Related: Franklin D Roosevelt Civil Rights Record: Why It Is Way More Complicated Than You Think
Common Misconceptions to Toss Out
- "You need a Social Security card to be a citizen." Nope. The birth certificate is the primary proof. The SSN is just for taxes and benefits.
- "If the parents are deported, the baby loses citizenship." False. The baby stays a citizen. However, the baby often ends up leaving with the parents because, well, it's a baby.
- "It’s a recent law." We already covered this. 1868. It’s older than the lightbulb.
The Economic Argument
Economists often weigh in on this too. The standard view is that birthright citizenship encourages faster integration into the workforce. When people know their children will be full citizens, they are more likely to invest in homes, businesses, and local communities.
On the flip side, critics point to the "public charge" aspect. They argue that births to non-citizens put a strain on Medicaid-funded deliveries and public schools. The data here is messy and often used to support whatever side the researcher already likes. What we do know is that the U.S. has a declining birth rate among native-born citizens. Without the boost from immigrant families—and their citizen children—the U.S. would eventually face the same demographic "death spiral" that is currently hitting Japan and Italy.
What's Next for US Birthright Citizenship?
Expect more court cases. While the "big" rule is unlikely to change without a massive legal earthquake, smaller rules might. We are seeing tighter scrutiny on "birth tourism" visas. We are seeing more aggressive questioning at borders for pregnant women.
But the core principle—that this land makes the person—remains the law of the land.
If you’re trying to navigate this yourself or for your family, stay informed on the specific visa requirements. Do not rely on "notaries" or "consultants" who promise a guaranteed passport. The process is strictly governed by the Department of State and USCIS.
Immediate Actions to Take:
- Verify Documentation: If you or a family member were born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents, ensure you have an "original" long-form birth certificate from the county of birth. This is your golden ticket.
- Consult an Immigration Attorney: If you are worried about how your status affects your child, talk to a member of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA). Do not guess.
- Understand Tax Obligations: If you have a child who is a U.S. citizen but lives abroad, consult a cross-border tax specialist early to avoid massive IRS penalties later in their life.
- Monitor Legislative Changes: While a Constitutional change is unlikely, keep an eye on "The Birthright Citizenship Act" which is frequently introduced in Congress. It rarely moves far, but it signals the current political temperature.
Ultimately, birthright citizenship is the ultimate "Welcome to America" or the ultimate "Legal Loophole," depending on who you ask. But for the millions of people who have built lives under its protection, it’s simply the reality of who they are.