Marshall McLuhan was a weird guy. He’d sit in his office at the University of Toronto, puffing on a pipe, and tell people that the content of a TV show didn't actually matter. Imagine telling a room full of 1960s ad executives that the plot of I Love Lucy was irrelevant compared to the glowing box it was beamed through. They thought he was a genius. Or a crackpot. Usually both.
But here’s the thing. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man isn't just an old book from 1964. It’s a map for the digital chaos we’re living in right now. When McLuhan wrote it, he wasn't looking at the past; he was looking at us. He saw the internet before it had a name. He saw how our phones would basically become part of our nervous systems.
Most people think "the medium is the message" is just a catchy slogan. It’s not. It’s a warning.
What Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man Actually Means
The core idea of the book is simple, yet it breaks most people’s brains when they first hear it. McLuhan argued that a "medium" is any extension of ourselves. A hammer extends our arm. A wheel extends our feet. A book extends our eyes.
When we create these tools, they don't just help us do things. They change how we think. They change how we relate to each other. Honestly, the "content"—the actual words in a book or the images in a movie—is just the "juicy piece of meat carried by the burglar to distract the watchdog of the mind." That’s one of his most famous lines, and it's brutal. It means while you’re busy arguing about a political tweet, the existence of Twitter is what's actually rewiring your brain.
The Psychic Amputation
This is where it gets a little dark. McLuhan talked about "auto-amputation." Basically, when we extend a part of ourselves through technology, we also numb that part.
Think about it. We extended our memory into the cloud. Now, can you remember more than three phone numbers? Probably not. We "amputated" our biological memory because the digital extension took over. We gained the ability to store trillions of gigabytes, but we lost the individual capacity to hold onto information. It’s a trade-off. We’re constantly trading bits of our natural selves for upgraded, external versions.
Hot and Cool Media: The Confusion Factor
If you’ve ever tried to read the original text of Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, you probably got stuck on the "Hot vs. Cool" chapter. It’s notoriously confusing because McLuhan used the terms differently than we do today.
💡 You might also like: Heavy Aircraft Integrated Avionics: Why the Cockpit is Becoming a Giant Smartphone
A "Hot" medium is high-definition. It’s packed with data. It doesn't leave much for the audience to do. Think of a movie in a theater or a high-res photograph. You just sit there and take it in. It’s "hot" because it’s intense and well-defined.
A "Cool" medium is low-definition. It’s "fuzzy." Because it lacks detail, your brain has to work harder to fill in the gaps. McLuhan called the TV of the 1960s "cool" because the picture was actually a series of dots that the eye had to stitch together.
Why does this matter now?
Because the internet is the ultimate "cool" medium. It demands constant participation. You aren't just watching; you're clicking, scrolling, commenting, and reacting. This high level of participation is why social media feels so exhausting. It’s a cool medium that forces us to be "on" all the time.
The Global Village Isn't a Utopia
People love to quote McLuhan’s "Global Village" idea like it’s some hippie dream of world peace. It’s really not.
McLuhan’s Global Village is actually a place of total surveillance and constant friction. He argued that when we’re all connected electronically, we can’t ignore each other anymore. We’re all "involved" in each other’s lives, whether we want to be or not.
Look at your feed. You’re seeing a war in one post, a cat video in the next, and a heated argument about a TV show right after that. This isn't peaceful. It’s a recipe for tribalism. McLuhan predicted that the more we are compressed together by technology, the more we will retreat into "tribes" to protect our identities. He saw the return of tribal warfare in the digital age decades before "cancel culture" or "echo chambers" became buzzwords.
📖 Related: Astronauts Stuck in Space: What Really Happens When the Return Flight Gets Cancelled
Why We Still Can't Put the Book Down
You might wonder why we’re still talking about a book written when black-and-white TVs were the norm. It’s because McLuhan understood the structure of change.
He didn't care about what people were saying on the radio. He cared about what the radio did to the human ear. Today, we spend so much time debating "fake news" or "AI safety," but we rarely talk about what the interface of a smartphone is doing to our posture, our attention spans, or our sense of time.
The smartphone is the ultimate extension. It’s an extension of our sight (camera), our voice (mic), our memory (search engines), and our social standing (likes). It is, quite literally, an extension of the central nervous system. When you lose your phone, you don't just feel like you lost a tool. You feel like you lost a limb. That’s exactly what McLuhan was talking about.
The Four Laws of Media (The Tetrad)
Late in his career, McLuhan (along with his son Eric) developed a way to analyze any new technology. He called it the Tetrad. If you want to understand how a new piece of tech—let’s say, Generative AI—will change the world, you ask four questions:
- What does it enhance? (Speed of content creation, access to information).
- What does it make obsolete? (Basic copywriting, entry-level coding, manual research).
- What does it retrieve from the past? (The oral tradition of asking questions/prompting, like a dialogue).
- What does it flip into when pushed to the limit? (Total misinformation, a loss of trust in any visual or written record).
This framework is much more useful than the "AI is good" or "AI is bad" debate. It looks at the effect of the medium itself.
The Narcissus Narcosis
Ever find yourself scrolling for two hours and then suddenly snap out of it, wondering where the time went? McLuhan had a term for that: Narcissus Narcosis.
The myth of Narcissus isn't just about vanity. Narcissus didn't fall in love with himself; he fell in love with a reflection of himself that he didn't recognize as his own. He became numb.
👉 See also: EU DMA Enforcement News Today: Why the "Consent or Pay" Wars Are Just Getting Started
We do the same thing with our digital extensions. We see our curated "selves" on Instagram or LinkedIn and we become hypnotized by the reflection. We forget that the tool is an extension of us and start treating the tool as the reality. We become servants to the systems we built to serve us.
Applying McLuhan to the 2020s
If you want to actually use the insights from Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, you have to stop looking at the "what" and start looking at the "how."
Stop worrying so much about the specific video you're watching. Start noticing how the act of watching short-form, vertical video (like TikTok) changes your ability to focus on a 300-page book. The book is a linear medium. It’s one word after another. It promotes logical, step-by-step thinking.
TikTok is a mosaic medium. It’s everything everywhere all at once. It promotes "pattern recognition" and emotional intensity. Neither is "better," but they create different types of humans. We are currently moving away from the "Gutenberg" human (logical, private, individual) and toward a new "Electronic" human (emotional, public, tribal).
Actionable Insights for the Digital Age
Reading McLuhan shouldn't just be an academic exercise. It should change how you interact with your devices. Since the medium is the message, you need to change your mediums to change your life.
- Audit your extensions. Look at the apps you use most. What part of your "self" are they extending? Is it your vanity? Your curiosity? Your anxiety? If an app is extending your anxiety, the "content" of the app doesn't matter. The act of using it is the problem.
- Practice "De-amputation." Occasionally, put the extension away. Write a note by hand. Navigate a new city without GPS. See what it feels like to use your "original" equipment. It’ll be clunky and frustrating, but it keeps your biological systems from going completely dormant.
- Watch the background, not the figure. In any new technology trend, ignore the flashy headlines (the "figure"). Look at the "background"—the infrastructure, the change in social habits, the way people spend their time. That’s where the real revolution is happening.
- Choose your "Hot" and "Cool" moments. If you’re overwhelmed, move toward a "hot" medium like a physical book or a long-form film. These require less "participation" from your nervous system than the frantic back-and-forth of a "cool" medium like a group chat or a Twitter thread.
McLuhan didn't want us to be luddites. He just wanted us to wake up. He used to say that "we shape our tools, and thereafter our tools shape us." We’ve spent the last few decades shaping some incredibly powerful tools. Now, it’s worth taking a second to look at how they’re shaping us back.
The environment we live in is no longer made of trees and air. It’s made of data and light. If we don't understand the media we use, we’re just the "content" inside someone else’s machine.
Take a breath. Put the phone down for ten minutes. Notice the room. That’s the first step in reclaiming your own nervous system from the extensions we’ve built. It’s a wild world out there in the global village, but you don't have to be a numb resident. You can be an observer. You can be the one who understands the medium.