If you’ve ever sat in the stands during an England versus Germany match, you’ve heard it. It’s loud. It’s repetitive. It’s "Two World Wars and One World Cup." Some people find it hilarious. Others think it’s a national embarrassment. But where did it actually come from, and why does a game played in 1966 still dominate the psyche of English football fans sixty years later? It's weird, honestly. Most of the people singing it weren't even born when Geoff Hurst hit that crossbar.
England fans have a complicated relationship with winning. Mostly because they don't do it very often. This specific chant is basically the ultimate "scoreboard" argument. It links the geopolitical victories of 1918 and 1945 with the 4-2 victory at Wembley in 1966. It's a trifecta of perceived British superiority over Germany. But if you look closer, the chant tells us more about English insecurity than it does about German rivalry.
Germany, for their part, barely cares. To them, the "Great Rivalry" is with the Netherlands. England is just another team they usually beat on penalties.
The 1966 Catalyst: When the World Cup Became Political
The 1966 World Cup final is the bedrock. You can’t have the chant without the "One World Cup" part. That afternoon at Wembley remains the single most important day in English sporting history. It’s the peak. Everything since has been a bit of a comedown.
Kenneth Wolstenholme’s famous commentary—"They think it's all over... it is now!"—didn't mention the wars. Back then, the relationship between the two countries was still thawing. West Germany was a key NATO ally. The fans in the stadium weren't necessarily looking for a fight; they were looking for a trophy. However, as the decades rolled on and England’s trophy cabinet stayed empty while Germany (then West Germany) kept winning—1974, 1980, 1990—the English needed a way to stay "on top."
Enter the chant.
It started gaining real traction in the late 1980s and early 1990s. This was the era of the "Hooligan" and a surge in British nationalism. The 1990 World Cup semi-final in Turin was a turning point. England lost on penalties. Gazza cried. The hurt was real. Linking football to the wars became a way to reclaim a sense of victory when the actual team on the pitch couldn't deliver.
Two World Wars and One World Cup: A Lyrical Breakdown
The song is sung to the tune of "Camptown Races." It’s simple. It’s catchy. It’s designed to be shouted by five thousand people who have had three pints of lukewarm lager.
✨ Don't miss: Mizzou 2024 Football Schedule: What Most People Get Wrong
Two World Wars and One World Cup, doo-dah, doo-dah.
Two World Wars and One World Cup, doo-dah-doo-dah-day.
There’s a second verse that often gets added: "England's going to win the Cup." This is usually factually incorrect.
Historians like David Goldblatt, who wrote The Ball is Round, have pointed out that football often serves as a proxy for national identity. In England, that identity is inextricably linked to the 1940s. While Germany moved on and rebuilt their entire national psyche around economic power and modern democracy, England stayed somewhat stuck in its "finest hour."
Is it offensive? FIFA and UEFA think so. They’ve cracked down on "political" chanting in recent years. The English FA has even tried to ban it, threatening fans with travel bans if they sing it at away games. But you can't really "ban" a feeling. Fans see it as "banter." They argue it’s not about Nazism or death, but about a historical rivalry.
Why the Germans find it confusing
If you talk to a German fan in Munich or Berlin, they’ll likely shrug. They don't have a song about the wars. They have a song about winning. They’ve won the World Cup four times. They’ve won the Euros three times. They don't need to reach back to the 1940s to find a reason to feel good about their national team.
There's a famous quote often attributed to Gary Lineker: "Football is a simple game. Twenty-two men chase a ball for 90 minutes and at the end, the Germans always win." That’s the reality the English chant is trying to ignore. By bringing up the "Two World Wars," the fans are shifting the goalposts. They are saying, "Sure, you’re better at football now, but we won the big one." It’s a coping mechanism.
The Media’s Role in Feeding the Fire
The British tabloids—The Sun, The Mirror, The Daily Star—have spent decades pouring gasoline on this. Ahead of the Euro '96 semi-final, The Daily Mirror ran a headline: "Achtung! Surrender." They even Photoshopped helmets onto Stuart Pearce and Paul Gascoigne.
🔗 Read more: Current Score of the Steelers Game: Why the 30-6 Texans Blowout Changed Everything
It was provocative. It was crude. It was exactly what the chant represents.
The editor at the time, Piers Morgan, later expressed some regret, but the damage was done. It solidified the idea that an England-Germany match wasn't just a game; it was a historical reenactment. When Gareth Southgate missed his penalty in that shootout, the narrative shifted from "war" to "trauma."
Interestingly, the chant has evolved. You’ll now hear younger fans singing it almost ironically. They know it’s dated. They know it’s a bit "Brexit." But they sing it because it’s part of the terrace culture. It’s a way of signaling "I am here with the England fans."
The 5-1 Anomaly
In September 2001, England went to Munich and beat Germany 5-1. It was a freak result. Michael Owen scored a hat-trick. Heskey got the fifth. For a brief moment, the "One World Cup" part of the chant felt like it might become "Two."
The chant reached a fever pitch that night. It felt like the historical hierarchy had been restored through sport. But then, as always, Germany went to the 2002 World Cup final while England went home in the quarters. The status quo returned. The chant remained the only weapon in the arsenal.
Beyond the Banter: The Darker Side
We have to talk about the reality of what "Two World Wars" actually implies. It’s about millions of lives lost. When sung in a stadium in Dortmund or Gelsenkirchen, it can feel incredibly toneless.
German fans aren't the only ones who find it distasteful. A large portion of the English fanbase, especially younger, more progressive supporters, hates it. They find it cringey. It’s seen as "Little Englander" behavior. There’s a divide in the stands. On one side, you have the "traditionalists" who think everything is PC gone mad. On the other, you have people who just want to watch Harry Kane score without having to hear about the Luftwaffe.
💡 You might also like: Last Match Man City: Why Newcastle Couldn't Stop the Semenyo Surge
Comparative Rivalries
- England vs. Scotland: Based on centuries of border wars and political tension.
- Argentina vs. Brazil: Purely about who has the better players (and Pele vs. Maradona).
- Germany vs. Netherlands: Born out of the 1974 final and the 1988 Euros.
- England vs. Germany: One-sided. One side thinks it’s a war; the other side thinks it’s a training session.
Is the Chant Dying Out?
Actually, yes. Slowly.
The 2022 Euros (Women’s) saw England beat Germany in the final. The "Lionesses" victory provided a fresh "One World Cup" (or at least a major trophy) to talk about. The vibe was different. There were fewer war references and more celebration of the actual sport.
As England’s squad becomes more diverse and more globalized, the players themselves don't relate to the 1940s rhetoric. When Jude Bellingham, who plays in Germany for years, hears those chants, he probably finds them bizarre. He shares a locker room with German players. They are his friends.
The chant thrives on "The Other." It requires seeing the opponent as an enemy from a history book rather than a colleague from the Bundesliga. As the world gets smaller, the chant gets harder to justify.
What You Should Know Before Singing
If you’re headed to a match, understand the context. This isn't just a song; it's a historical artifact. It carries the weight of a century of European history.
- Know your surroundings. Singing this in a pub in London is one thing. Singing it in a central square in Germany can get you arrested or attacked. German laws regarding war-related speech are much stricter than those in the UK.
- Understand the "L." If you sing about winning and then England loses 4-1 (like in 2010), you look like a clown. The chant only works if you have the moral high ground, and in football, the high ground is the trophy.
- Respect the memory. Many veterans find the trivialization of the World Wars for a football game offensive. It’s worth remembering that the "Two World Wars" involved a lot more than just beating a team in white shirts.
Actionable Insights for the Modern Fan
Instead of leaning on tired 80-year-old tropes, fans are finding new ways to express the England-Germany rivalry. The "Sweet Caroline" era of England support is much more inclusive and less focused on historical trauma.
- Focus on current stars: Chant about the players on the pitch. Saka, Bellingham, and Foden have done more for English pride recently than a result from 1966.
- Learn the German perspective: Understanding why they don't see England as their main rival can actually make the games more interesting. It turns the match into a quest for respect rather than a battle for historical revenge.
- Check the rules: The FA is actively monitoring fan behavior. If you want to keep your away game credits and your tickets for the next tournament, avoid the "Two World Wars" song. It’s on the watch list.
The phrase "Two World Wars and One World Cup" is a snapshot of a specific time in British culture. It’s about a nation trying to find its place in a post-empire world where it's no longer the dominant force—either in politics or on the football pitch. It’s loud, it’s proud, and it’s increasingly out of date.
England will eventually win another major tournament. When they do, the chant will have to change. Maybe it’ll be "Two World Wars and Two World Cups." But honestly? It’s probably time to just let the wars stay in the history books and keep the football on the grass.