Elon Musk didn't just buy a social media platform; he bought a digital paper trail. When the twitter files full text began dropping in late 2022, it felt like the internet’s version of a heist movie. Independent journalists like Matt Taibbi and Bari Weiss were handed the keys to the kingdom. They spent weeks digging through Slack messages, internal emails, and moderation logs that were never meant to see the light of day.
People are still arguing about what was actually found. Was it a "nothingburger," or was it the smoking gun for state-sponsored censorship? Honestly, it depends on who you ask and how much you value the "walls" between the government and private tech.
Where to Find the Twitter Files Full Text Today
If you're looking for one giant, searchable PDF containing everything, you’re going to be disappointed. It doesn't exist. The "files" aren't a single document; they are a series of massive threads posted primarily on X (formerly Twitter) and Substack.
To see the twitter files full text, you basically have to hunt down the original threads. Most people use "thread unrollers" to read them because scrolling through 80 individual tweets is a nightmare for your thumb and your sanity. You've got journalists like Lee Fang, Michael Shellenberger, and David Zweig who each handled different "drops."
📖 Related: Why Live Triple Doppler Radar is the Only Thing Keeping You Safe in a Storm
- Matt Taibbi’s Substack: He has archived a lot of the raw screenshots and commentary there.
- X Search: Searching for "Twitter Files" by specific authors is the most direct way to see the original timestamps and interactions.
- Congressional Records: Because this led to House committee hearings, a lot of the screenshots are now part of the public record in Washington.
The Hunter Biden Laptop and the "Handled" Emails
The first big drop focused on the New York Post’s story about Hunter Biden’s laptop. You remember that? It was October 2020. Twitter blocked the link entirely. They even stopped people from sending it in Direct Messages.
The twitter files full text revealed that the decision to label it "hacked materials" was made at the top, but without the then-CEO Jack Dorsey even knowing. One of the most famous screenshots shows a Twitter executive writing "Handled these" in response to a request from the Biden campaign to review certain tweets.
Now, to be fair, the files also show that the Trump White House made requests too. Twitter was basically a digital battlefield where both sides were constantly flagging things they didn't like. But the internal emails showed a clear, heavy-leaning bias among the staff who were actually clicking the "delete" button. They were often struggling with their own rules.
Shadow Banning and the "Visibility Filtering" Secret
For years, Twitter insisted they didn't shadow ban. Technically, they didn't use that specific word. Instead, they called it "Visibility Filtering" or VF.
Bari Weiss’s reporting showed that Twitter had secret categories. There was a "Trends Blacklist" and a "Search Blacklist." If you were on the list, your account wouldn't pop up in searches, and your tweets wouldn't trend, no matter how much engagement you got.
- Dr. Jay Bhattacharya: A Stanford professor who questioned COVID-19 lockdowns. He was placed on a "Trends Blacklist."
- Dan Bongino: His account was flagged with a "Search Blacklist" tag.
- Libs of TikTok: This account had a specific note saying "Do Not Take Action on User Without Consulting With SIP-PES."
Basically, the "trust and safety" team had a set of tools that could turn a user's reach to zero without the user ever knowing why their engagement plummeted. It’s kinda spooky when you realize how much power a few people in San Francisco had over the global "town square."
The FBI and the "Censorship-Industrial Complex"
This is where things get really heavy. The twitter files full text suggests that the FBI wasn't just occasionally calling Twitter; they were practically roommates.
There was a dedicated portal for government agencies to flag content. We’re talking about thousands of requests. The FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF) met regularly with Twitter executives. Internal emails showed that the FBI even paid Twitter millions of dollars to reimburse them for the "staff time" spent processing these requests.
The government’s argument was that they were protecting the public from foreign "disinformation." The critics, including the journalists who wrote the files, argued that this was the government using a private company as a proxy to bypass the First Amendment. If the FBI tells a company to "look at this," and the company knows the FBI regulates them, is that really a "voluntary" suggestion?
What Most People Get Wrong About the Files
A lot of the "nothingburger" crowd points out that private companies have the right to moderate their platforms. That’s true. If I start a website, I can ban you for wearing a green shirt if I want to.
But the twitter files full text isn't really about the "right" to moderate. It’s about the process and the influence. It showed a platform that was being steered by external pressures—whether from the FBI, the DHS, or political campaigns—often in violation of its own written policies.
Another misconception is that it was all about one party. While the data shows a skew toward flagging conservative accounts, the underlying infrastructure was built to be used by whoever held the keys to the "request" portal. It was a systemic issue, not just a partisan one.
Why This Still Matters in 2026
We’re a few years removed from the initial leaks, but the ripple effects are everywhere.
💡 You might also like: Why Every Book About Apple Company Seems to Tell a Different Story
The Supreme Court has had to weigh in on cases like Murthy v. Missouri, which looked at whether the government’s "encouragement" of social media moderation crossed the line into coercion. We’re also seeing a massive shift in how AI is being used to moderate content. In 2026, we don’t need a room full of people to "handle" tweets; we have algorithms doing it at a scale that makes the original Twitter Files look like child’s play.
If you want to understand the modern internet, you have to understand the twitter files full text. It was the moment the "black box" of social media was cracked open, even if just for a second.
How to Navigate the Archives Yourself
- Use Wayback Machine: Since many tweets get deleted or accounts get suspended, the Internet Archive is your best friend for seeing the original screenshots.
- Read the Taibbi/Weiss Joint Reports: They often cross-referenced each other's work to show how the FBI and DHS coordinated.
- Check the Congressional Exhibits: The House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government has high-resolution versions of the most important documents.
Take the time to read the source material instead of just the headlines. You'll find that the reality is a lot messier—and more interesting—than either side wants to admit. There are no heroes in these files, just a lot of people trying to control a conversation that had grown too big for any one person to handle.
To dig deeper into the actual documents, you should start by searching for the "Twitter Files Index" on Substack, which organizes the various threads by topic, such as the COVID-19 response or the removal of Donald Trump.
By comparing the internal "policy" emails with the public-facing "PR" statements from that era, you can see exactly where the disconnect happened. This is the best way to form an objective opinion on whether the moderation was a necessary evil or a breach of public trust.