It was a hot August day in Manhattan back in 2022 when the motorcade pulled up. You probably remember the headlines. Donald Trump was heading into the New York Attorney General’s office for a deposition that had been months in the making. People were expecting fireworks. Instead, they got silence. Well, a very specific kind of silence. Trump pleading the 5th ended up being the story of the day, and honestly, it’s a moment that still ripples through the legal world today.
He didn't just do it once or twice. He did it more than 400 times.
🔗 Read more: How Old You Have to Be to Be President: The Real Story Behind the Magic Number 35
For nearly four hours, the former president sat across from Letitia James’ investigators and repeated variations of "same answer." It’s a move that feels like something out of a courtroom drama, but the reality is way more technical and, frankly, a bit more calculated than most people realize. If you've ever wondered why a guy who once famously asked, "If you're innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?" would suddenly do exactly that, you're not alone.
The 400-Plus "Same Answers"
Let’s get into the weeds for a second. In a typical deposition, you're under oath. You have to answer. But the U.S. Constitution gives you a "get out of jail free" card—or at least a "stay silent" card—via the Fifth Amendment. When we talk about Trump pleading the 5th, we’re talking about a very specific legal strategy used during a civil investigation into his business dealings.
The New York Attorney General was looking into whether the Trump Organization padded the value of its assets to get better loans while lowballing those same values to pay less in taxes.
Trump’s legal team was in a tight spot. Why? Because while this was a civil case, there was a parallel criminal investigation happening at the same time. Anything he said in that room with Letitia James could have been gift-wrapped and handed over to the Manhattan District Attorney.
- The Tally: Sources close to the deposition reported he invoked the privilege over 440 times.
- The Exception: He did answer one question right at the start. He stated his name. After that, the shutters came down.
- The Reasoning: In a statement released during the deposition, Trump argued that he had "no choice" because his family and business were being targeted by a "politically motivated witch hunt."
It’s kinda fascinating because his own son, Eric Trump, had already set the stage. Eric reportedly pleaded the Fifth more than 500 times in his own deposition back in 2020. It was a family affair of silence.
The "Adverse Inference" Trap
Here is the thing most people miss about the Fifth Amendment: it works differently depending on what kind of court you’re in.
In a criminal trial, a jury isn't allowed to hold it against you. If you’re a defendant and you don't testify, the judge tells the jury, "Hey, don't assume he's guilty just because he's quiet." It’s a fundamental protection.
But in a civil case? That’s a whole different ballgame.
In New York civil law, if you refuse to testify by invoking your Fifth Amendment rights, the judge or jury can actually draw what's called an adverse inference. Basically, they are allowed to assume that if you had answered the question truthfully, the answer would have been bad for you.
When Trump pleading the 5th became the strategy, his lawyers knew this. They were essentially making a trade. They decided that the risk of him saying something that could lead to a criminal indictment was way worse than the risk of a civil judge assuming he was hiding something.
"The Mob Takes the Fifth"
You can’t talk about this without mentioning the irony. We’ve all seen the clips from the 2016 campaign trail. Trump was at a rally in Iowa, leaning into the microphone, and saying, "The mob takes the Fifth. If you're innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?"
He was talking about Hillary Clinton’s staffers at the time.
Fast forward to 2022, and his tune changed completely. During the deposition, he even addressed his past comments. He told investigators that he used to ask that question, but "now I know the answer." He argued that when the "system" is out to get you, the Fifth is your only shield.
Whether you buy that or not usually depends on your politics, but from a purely legal standpoint, it was a massive pivot. It’s one of those rare moments where a public figure’s past rhetoric crashes head-first into their current legal reality.
What Actually Happened Next?
The silence in that room didn't stop the case. In fact, Letitia James eventually filed a massive $250 million lawsuit against Trump, his adult sons, and the company.
💡 You might also like: Map of Battle of Berlin: Finding the Truth Beneath the Rubble
The fact that he didn't answer questions about his "Statement of Financial Condition" didn't make the evidence go away. Investigators already had thousands of pages of emails, bank records, and spreadsheets. In many ways, the Trump pleading the 5th strategy was about damage control—preventing him from adding new fuel to the fire.
Why this matters for everyone else:
Honestly, this case is a masterclass in how the Fifth Amendment isn't just for "criminals" or "the mob." It’s a tool.
- It’s a Shield: It prevents the government from forcing you to be the witness against yourself.
- It has Costs: In civil matters, silence is loud. It can cost you millions in damages if a judge draws that "adverse inference."
- Context is King: The same action can be a brilliant legal move and a political nightmare at the same time.
Moving Forward: Actionable Insights
If you ever find yourself in a situation where legal testimony is required—which, let's hope, isn't anytime soon—there are a few takeaways from the Trump saga that apply to the real world.
First, understand the forum. If it's a civil deposition but there's even a 1% chance of criminal "spillover," you need a lawyer who understands both worlds. The "adverse inference" is a heavy price to pay, but prison is heavier.
Second, consistency is key. If you're going to plead the Fifth, you usually have to do it for everything related to the topic. You can't pick and choose "easy" questions and then shut up for the hard ones; that's called "waiving the privilege," and it's a fast way to get into deep trouble.
Finally, separate the optics from the law. What looks "guilty" to the public is often just "smart" to a defense attorney. Trump's move was a calculated risk that prioritized his long-term legal safety over his short-term public image.
Whether you're looking at this from a political lens or a legal one, Trump pleading the 5th remains a landmark example of how the Bill of Rights actually functions when the stakes are at their absolute highest. It wasn't just a moment of silence—it was a high-stakes legal gambit that redefined the trajectory of his New York legal battles.
To stay protected in any legal setting, always consult with a specialized attorney before providing sworn testimony, as the nuances of state-specific civil laws can turn a simple statement into a significant liability. Reviewing your past public statements is also crucial, as they can be used to challenge the sincerity of your legal positions in court.