The energy was different this time. When you watch a Trump interview with Hannity, you usually expect a certain rhythm—a familiar back-and-forth between two guys who have been in the trenches together for decades. But sitting there in January 2026, just days before the first anniversary of his second inauguration, the vibe wasn't just celebratory. It was heavy with the weight of some pretty massive geopolitical shifts. Honestly, if you blinked over the last week, you probably missed a couple of literal history-making moments.
Between the capture of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela and the intensifying "Donroe Doctrine," there was a lot to get through. Sean Hannity, looking like he’d stayed up for three days straight covering the "raid of the century," jumped right into the deep end.
The Venezuela "Deal" and the New Energy Reality
The big elephant in the room was obviously the oil. We've all seen the headlines about the U.S. military operation to oust Maduro, but during the Trump interview with Hannity, the President dropped some specifics that hadn't quite made it to the press briefings yet. He basically told Sean that he's already "formed a deal" with major oil executives.
"They're going to be going in with hundreds of billions of dollars," Trump said, leaning in. He talked about Venezuela's "dilapidated" industry like a fixer-upper house. He’s promising total safety for American workers heading down there. It sounds ambitious, maybe even a bit wild, but that’s the play. He wants to divvy up the proceeds to make Venezuela "rich and safe" while ensuring American energy dominance.
Critics are already screaming about "imperialism," and the legal questions are piling up like snow in a Minnesota winter. But Trump’s response to the critics? "I don't care." He’s operating on his own compass, focused on what he calls the "Donroe Doctrine"—a 21st-century spin on the Monroe Doctrine that prioritizes U.S. supremacy in the Western Hemisphere.
✨ Don't miss: Melissa Calhoun Satellite High Teacher Dismissal: What Really Happened
The Minneapolis Standoff and the Insurrection Act
Things got a bit more tense when the conversation shifted back home. You’ve probably heard about the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis during an ICE operation. It’s turned that city into a powder keg. During the Trump interview with Hannity, the President didn't mince words about the protests or the local leadership.
He called the shooting "unfortunate" but doubled down on sending militarized officers into American cities. Here is where it gets real: he’s openly weighing the use of the Insurrection Act.
- The Threat: Sending federal military forces into Minneapolis.
- The Justification: Trump claims "thousands of murderers" have been removed, though fact-checkers are having a field day with that specific number.
- The Conflict: Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey are basically in a state of "guerrilla warfare" with the federal government over these ICE actions.
Trump basically told Hannity that if the local leaders can't "restore order," he will. It’s a massive expansion of presidential power that has legal scholars like Jonathan Turley arguing that the authority exists, while others are sounding every alarm bell they have.
Greenland, the Fed, and the "Fake" Polls
Then there’s the Greenland thing. Yeah, it’s back.
🔗 Read more: Wisconsin Judicial Elections 2025: Why This Race Broke Every Record
Hannity asked about the pushback from Denmark and even some Senate Republicans. Trump dismissed a Reuters/Ipsos poll showing low support for the idea as "fake." He’s convinced we need the island to keep Russia and China from setting up shop in the Arctic. It’s classic Trump—the bigger the deal, the more he digs in his heels.
He also took some swings at the Federal Reserve. He’s investigating Chairman Jerome Powell, and when Hannity mentioned that Jamie Dimon (the JPMorgan Chase CEO) was worried about White House interference, Trump just shrugged it off. "A lot of times, you can't convince a voter," he said. "You have to just do what's right."
Midterm Anxiety and the "Dictator" Rhetoric
Interestingly, for a guy who just won a historic non-consecutive second term, he’s already sweating the 2026 midterms. He called it a "deep psychological thing" where the winning party loses the midterms. He even joked—or maybe he wasn't joking—that they’ve accomplished so much that "we shouldn't even have an election."
That kind of talk is exactly what feeds the "Day One Dictator" narrative that started back in that December 2023 Iowa town hall. Hannity tried to give him an out, asking about the abuse of power, but Trump stuck to his "Day One" line, focusing on closing the border and "drill, drill, drill." A year into the term, it’s clear that "Day One" has stretched into a very long year.
💡 You might also like: Casey Ramirez: The Small Town Benefactor Who Smuggled 400 Pounds of Cocaine
What This Means for You
So, what’s the takeaway from this latest Trump interview with Hannity? It's that the "America First" agenda has pivoted into a very active "America Everywhere" strategy in the Western Hemisphere.
- Energy Prices: If the Venezuela deal actually happens, expect a massive shift in global oil markets.
- Domestic Security: The use of federal agents in cities isn't stopping; if anything, it’s going to get more intense.
- Global Alliances: The "rules-based order" is being rewritten. If you’re a business owner or an investor, the volatility is the only thing you can count on.
Keep an eye on the legal filings coming out of Minnesota. That lawsuit filed by Attorney General Keith Ellison is the first real test of how far the administration can push the Insurrection Act on home soil. If you want to stay ahead of the curve, watch the oil executive meetings at the White House—that’s where the real "deals" are being cooked.
To stay informed on how these federal policies might affect local governance and your taxes, you should check your state's latest legislative updates regarding federal-state cooperation and immigration enforcement.