If you walk into a federal building in D.C. or even a regional Social Security office right now, the vibe is... tense. Honestly, that might be an understatement. Since Donald Trump returned to the White House, the relationship between Trump and federal employees has shifted from a simmering policy debate to an all-out structural war.
It’s not just about politics. It’s about how the government actually functions on a Tuesday morning at 9:00 AM.
For decades, the "civil service" was this boring, stable thing. You got a job, you did your work, and you stayed there through different presidents because you were protected by laws that said you couldn’t be fired just because a new boss didn't like your tie—or your political party. But that world is basically gone. We’ve entered an era where the "merit system" is being traded for what the administration calls "accountability" and what critics call a "spoils system."
The Schedule F Factor: Why 50,000 People Are Nervous
You've probably heard the term Schedule F. It sounds like a tax form, but it’s actually a reclassification tool. Basically, the Trump administration wants to take career civil servants—people who are supposed to be non-partisan experts—and move them into a category where they can be fired "at will."
Think about the person who analyzes climate data or the lawyer who checks if a new drug is safe. Under the new rules proposed and implemented in 2025, if those people are in "policy-influencing" roles, they can be cleared out. The administration argues that if a President is elected to carry out a mandate, they shouldn't be blocked by "unelected bureaucrats" who disagree with them.
But here’s the kicker: the number of people affected is huge. We aren't just talking about a few top-level advisors. Estimates from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) suggest that upwards of 50,000 federal employees could be moved into this "Schedule Policy/Career" category. That’s about 2% of the entire federal workforce.
🔗 Read more: Elecciones en Honduras 2025: ¿Quién va ganando realmente según los últimos datos?
The "DOGE" Effect and the Shrinking Workforce
It’s impossible to talk about Trump and federal employees without mentioning Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency, or "DOGE." This isn't a joke or a meme anymore. It’s a literal department with a mandate to slash spending and, by extension, people.
As of January 2026, the data is starting to get real.
- The federal workforce has already seen a 9.9% reduction since the second inauguration.
- That’s over 200,000 people gone from the payroll.
- Some left via the "Deferred Resignation Program," which basically offered people full pay through September 2025 if they promised to walk away quietly.
A lot of people took the deal. Why stay in a job where you feel like there’s a target on your back? But for those who stayed, the workload hasn't decreased; there are just fewer people to do it.
The Agencies Getting Hit the Hardest
It’s not a uniform cut across the board. The administration is being surgical.
The Department of Education is essentially on life support, with Secretary Linda McMahon openly discussing how to shutter the whole thing. Then you have USAID, which was basically dismantled, with its functions folded into the State Department and thousands of contracts terminated.
💡 You might also like: Trump Approval Rating State Map: Why the Red-Blue Divide is Moving
Even the "safe" agencies are feeling it. The Defense Department lost over 60,000 employees in 2025 alone. It’s a massive brain drain. When you lose a career scientist at the CDC or an engineer at NASA, you don't just "hire a replacement" on LinkedIn. That’s decades of institutional knowledge walking out the door.
The 1% Pay Raise Sticking Point
If you're a federal worker, your paycheck just took a hit, even if the numbers went up. For 2026, the administration implemented a 1.0% across-the-board pay increase.
Now, on paper, a raise is a raise. But when you look at inflation and the rising cost of living in hubs like D.C. or San Francisco, a 1% bump feels more like a pay cut. Compare that to previous years where raises were often 4% or 5%, and you can see why morale is in the basement.
The administration’s logic is simple: they want to run the government like a lean business. If a business is "failing" (in their view), you don't give the staff big raises. You cut costs.
Unions Are the Last Line of Defense (And They're Struggling)
The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) and other unions are currently buried in paperwork. They are suing the administration left and right.
📖 Related: Ukraine War Map May 2025: Why the Frontlines Aren't Moving Like You Think
Just this month, a judge in Seattle had to step in because the administration tried to unilaterally terminate a collective bargaining agreement for 47,000 TSA officers. Imagine being a TSA agent, working through a government shutdown (which we’ve had plenty of lately), and finding out your union protections were being stripped away in the middle of the night.
Current Legal Battles to Watch:
- The TSA Injunction: A federal judge ruled that the administration cannot just ignore existing union contracts.
- The "Protect America's Workforce Act": This is a bill moving through Congress that tries to bake civil service protections into law so a President can't just "Executive Order" them away. It passed the House, but the Senate is a toss-up.
- Supreme Court Rulings: The high court has already allowed the administration to move forward with certain "Reductions in Force" (RIFs), signaling that they might be sympathetic to the idea that a President has broad power over the executive branch.
What This Means for You (The Taxpayer)
You might think, "Who cares? I don't work for the government."
But the relationship between Trump and federal employees affects how quickly you get your passport. It affects how long the line is at the airport. It affects whether the meat in your grocery store was actually inspected or if a "self-certification" system replaced a human inspector.
When you move from a system of experts to a system of "loyalists," the priority changes. The person handling your Social Security claim might be more worried about meeting a new "political alignment" metric than they are about getting your check processed on time. Sorta scary when you think about it.
Actionable Insights for Federal Employees and Observers
If you’re currently in the federal system or looking to enter it, the "old rules" no longer apply. Here is how to navigate the current 2026 landscape:
- Document Everything: If you are in a role that might be reclassified under Schedule F, keep meticulous records of your performance reviews. The administration's stated goal is to remove "poor performers," so don't give them a paper trail to use against you.
- Know Your EEO Rights: Even with the current administration's changes, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act is still the law of the land. Discrimination based on race, religion, or sex is still illegal. If you feel targeted, contact an Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) officer within 45 days.
- Watch the "Shadow" Rules: Many changes aren't happening via big announcements. They’re happening through internal memos and "guidance." Stay connected with your union or professional associations like the Senior Executives Association (SEA) to stay ahead of these shifts.
- Financial Planning: With 1% raises and the threat of RIFs, now is the time to beef up your emergency fund. The days of "federal job = job for life" are, at least for now, on pause.
The friction between the White House and the civil service isn't going away. It’s a fundamental redesign of the American government. Whether you see it as "draining the swamp" or "destroying the experts," the reality is that the federal workforce of 2026 is smaller, more vulnerable, and more politically charged than it has been in over a century.