You probably remember the grainy, flickering VHS tapes or the early LiveLeak links. If you grew up in the 90s or the early 2000s, Traces of Death videos were a kind of playground legend. It wasn't just a movie; it was a dare. You’d be at a sleepover, and someone’s older brother would pull out a tape with a crude, skeleton-themed cover. Honestly, it felt illegal to even hold it.
Damon Fox and the crew at Dead Alive Productions didn't invent the "death film" genre, but they certainly made it uglier. While Faces of Death relied on corn syrup and bad acting for about 40% of its runtime, Traces of Death went the other way. It was raw. It was mostly real. It was basically a compilation of news outtakes, medical training films, and war footage stitched together with a heavy metal soundtrack.
People often confuse the two. They shouldn't. One is a campy horror flick; the other is a disturbing archive of the end of life.
The Gritty Reality Behind the Footage
The first volume dropped in 1993. At that time, the "mondo" film genre was dying out, but the home video market was exploding. Fox realized he didn't need a budget for actors. He just needed access to international news feeds and police archives. This is where things get heavy. The series famously includes the 1987 televised suicide of Pennsylvania politician R. Budd Dwyer. It’s a moment that changed how we view televised trauma.
You’ve likely seen the clips without knowing the context. That’s the thing about these videos—they strip away the humanity of the person and turn a tragedy into a "segment." It’s sort of a precursor to how social media algorithms feed us disaster clips today.
Technically, the editing in the early volumes was chaotic. You’d have a segment on a forensic autopsy followed immediately by a pit bull attack, all while a band like Incantation or Baphomet roared in the background. It created this surreal, numbing effect. It wasn't trying to teach you anything. It was trying to see if you'd look away.
Why Do We Keep Looking?
Psychologists call it "benign masochism." We’re wired to pay attention to threats. It's an evolutionary leftover. If you see a predator or a fatal accident, your brain wants to study it so you can avoid that fate. But in the 90s, the Traces of Death videos turned that survival instinct into a commodity.
Dr. Jeffrey Goldstein, a researcher at Utrecht University, has spent years looking into why people enjoy "dark" entertainment. He argues that it’s about the "arousal transfer." Your heart rate spikes, you feel a rush of adrenaline, and when the video ends, your body floods with a sense of relief because you are safe. You're alive. The person on the screen isn't, but you are.
📖 Related: Gwendoline Butler Dead in a Row: Why This 1957 Mystery Still Packs a Punch
It’s a weird, dark mirror.
The Legal and Ethical Gray Zone
How was this even legal? Well, in the US, it mostly fell under the First Amendment. If the footage was obtained legally from public records or international news agencies, there wasn't much a prosecutor could do. However, in the UK, the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) wasn't having it. They famously refused to classify several volumes, effectively banning them under the Video Recordings Act.
They argued that the films had no "journalistic or educational merit." Honestly? They weren't wrong. Fox himself admitted in several underground zine interviews that the goal was shock value. It was counter-culture. It was the cinematic equivalent of a middle finger to the polished, sanitized world of Hollywood.
The Evolution from VHS to the Dark Web
The distribution of these videos has changed wildly. In 1995, you had to find a "cool" independent video store or order via a PO Box in a back-page ad of a horror magazine. Today, the spirit of these compilations lives on in subreddits and "gore sites."
But there’s a massive difference.
The original tapes had a narrator—originally Damon Fox, later Brain Damage. They tried to frame the footage, however loosely, as a "study" of mortality. Modern internet gore is just raw data. It’s faster, more accessible, and arguably much more damaging to the psyche because there’s no barrier to entry.
- Volume 1 (1993): The one that started it all. High focus on the Dwyer footage.
- Volume 2 (1994): More focus on animal attacks and cycling accidents.
- Volume 3 (1995): The "Shocking Asia" style influence becomes more apparent.
- Volume 4 & 5: By this point, the novelty was wearing thin, and the soundtracks became the main selling point for metalheads.
The transition to digital basically killed the commercial "shockumentary." Why pay $25 for a DVD when you can see the same things on a forum for free? This shift led to the closure of many boutique labels that specialized in this stuff.
👉 See also: Why ASAP Rocky F kin Problems Still Runs the Club Over a Decade Later
Fact-Checking the "Snuff" Rumors
Let’s be clear: Traces of Death is not a "snuff" film. A snuff film, by definition, is a movie where a murder is committed specifically for the purpose of being filmed and sold for profit. Despite the urban legends of the 80s and 90s, the FBI has repeatedly stated that they have found no evidence of a commercial snuff market.
Everything in these videos is "found" footage. It's footage of events that would have happened whether a camera was there or not. This is a crucial distinction. It doesn't make the content any less disturbing, but it moves it from the realm of "criminal conspiracy" to "disturbing journalism."
Most of the "deaths" people claimed were staged in Faces of Death were proven to be fakes. In Traces, they were almost all real. That's why the legacy of Fox's work is so much darker. You aren't watching a special effects artist's portfolio. You're watching someone's last Tuesday.
The Psychological Impact on the Viewer
Is watching this stuff bad for you?
Maybe. It depends on the person. Some people develop a "desensitization" effect. Over time, it takes more extreme imagery to get the same emotional response. This is a well-documented phenomenon in media psychology. For others, it can trigger genuine PTSD or "secondary trauma."
If you find yourself seeking out Traces of Death videos or similar content during times of high stress, it might be a coping mechanism—a way to feel "in control" of death. But it’s a slippery slope. Exposure to real-world violence on screen has been linked in some studies to increased anxiety and a "mean world" syndrome, where you perceive the world as much more dangerous than it actually is.
Navigating the Legacy
Today, these films are mostly historical curiosities. They represent a specific era of the "Satanic Panic" aftermath and the pre-internet Wild West. If you’re looking into them for their place in film history, there’s a lot to unpack regarding censorship and the "Mondo" tradition.
✨ Don't miss: Ashley My 600 Pound Life Now: What Really Happened to the Show’s Most Memorable Ashleys
If you’re watching them just for the thrill, just know that the "rush" wears off, but the images usually stay.
What You Should Do Instead
If you’re interested in the darker side of human history or forensic science, there are better ways to engage with the topic than watching 30-year-old shock videos.
Research the history of Forensic Pathology. Understanding how we investigate death is far more fascinating than just watching it happen. Books like Working Stiff by Judy Melinek provide a real, respectful look at what happens after the heart stops.
Support media preservation. If you’re a film nerd, look into how the "Video Nasties" era shaped current ratings systems. Organizations like the EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation) talk a lot about digital censorship, which is the modern version of the battle Fox fought in the 90s.
Check your sources. If you see a "shock" clip online today, verify it. A lot of modern "gore" is actually CGI from movies or high-end prosthetics passed off as real to get clicks. Don't let yourself be manipulated by an uploader looking for engagement.
Ultimately, these videos are a part of our cultural history, for better or worse. They remind us that there is a part of the human brain that will always be fascinated by the forbidden. Just remember that behind every grainy clip, there was a real person with a story that didn't end on a VHS tape.