Let's be real for a second. When you hear the words "Tom and Jerry," you probably think of a living room, a frying pan to the face, and maybe a little bit of jazz music. You definitely don't think of a psychedelic chocolate factory or a weirdly judgmental candy maker in a purple top hat. Yet, back in 2017, Warner Bros. decided to smash these two worlds together. Tom and Jerry: Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory is one of those movies that makes you tilt your head and squint. It exists. It's real. And honestly, it’s a lot more fascinating as a piece of corporate animation history than anyone gives it credit for.
People were mad. Fans of the 1971 Gene Wilder classic felt like it was some kind of sacrilege. Animation purists thought the cat and mouse didn't belong in Roald Dahl's world. But if you actually sit down and watch it, you realize it’s not just a remake. It’s a shot-for-shot recreation of the original film with two silent slapstick characters literally edited into the background. It’s weird. It’s chaotic. It’s basically a high-budget "green screen" experiment from a major studio.
The Weird Logic of the Crossover
Why does this movie even exist? Money is the easy answer, sure. But specifically, Warner Bros. has been doing these "crossover" direct-to-video movies for years. They put Tom and Jerry in the Wizard of Oz. They put them with Sherlock Holmes. They even put them with Jonny Quest. The strategy is simple: take a classic IP that kids might find "old" and inject the most famous cat-and-mouse duo in history to make it sellable to modern toddlers.
In this specific outing, the plot follows the 1971 movie almost beat for beat. Charlie Bucket finds the Golden Ticket. Grandpa Joe gets out of bed. They go to the factory. The twist is that Tom and Jerry are also there, helping Charlie behind the scenes. They’re basically the invisible stagehands of the story. While Willy Wonka is singing "Pure Imagination," Tom is probably getting his tail stuck in a gear or Jerry is hoarding a Wonka Bar. It’s a bizarre juxtaposition of tone. You have the whimsical, slightly dark energy of Roald Dahl clashing with the "anvil-on-head" humor of William Hanna and Joseph Barbera.
Some critics, like those over at Common Sense Media, pointed out that while the movie tries to be faithful, the addition of the cat and mouse often distracts from the emotional core of Charlie's journey. It’s hard to care about Charlie’s poverty when a cat is being flattened like a pancake in the next frame.
👉 See also: The Entire History of You: What Most People Get Wrong About the Grain
The Visuals: A Low-Budget Time Capsule
Visually, the movie is... interesting. It doesn't look like the high-end animation of the 1940s. It has that distinct "digital ink and wash" look of the late 2010s. The character designs for the humans—Charlie, Wonka, Augustus Gloop—are all based on the 1971 actors. It’s a bit uncanny. Seeing a cartoon version of Gene Wilder interacting with a 2D Tom is a trip.
The animation was handled by Warner Bros. Animation, and they clearly had a specific directive: keep the original movie's timing. Because the film uses the exact songs and a lot of the same dialogue pacing as the '71 film, the slapstick has to be timed to the millisecond to avoid breaking the flow. It’s a technical achievement, even if it feels unnecessary.
One thing that genuinely works? The Oompa-Loompas. Their songs are already rhythmic and repetitive, which fits the Tom and Jerry style perfectly. When the cat and mouse get caught up in the "Oompa Loompa Doompa-dee-do" sequences, the physical comedy actually feels somewhat natural. It’s the one time the two universes stop fighting each other and actually start dancing.
Why People Love to Hate It
There is a massive divide between how kids see this movie and how adults see it. To a five-year-old, it’s just more Tom and Jerry. They love the chases. They love the bright colors of the chocolate room. They don't have the "baggage" of the original film.
✨ Don't miss: Shamea Morton and the Real Housewives of Atlanta: What Really Happened to Her Peach
But for adults? It’s a meme. It’s a "cursed image" in movie form. Part of the backlash came from the fact that it felt like a cheap way to keep a trademark alive. Roald Dahl’s estate is notoriously protective (or at least they used to be), and seeing his work blended with slapstick felt "off" to many.
However, there’s a subculture of animation fans who find these movies hilarious because they are so weird. It’s like a "so bad it’s good" situation. There’s something genuinely funny about Tom trying to sneak past a cartoon version of the terrifying boat ride scene. It leans into the absurdity.
Breaking Down the Plot Changes
- Charlie’s Motivation: In this version, Tom and Jerry actually help Charlie find the ticket. It’s not just luck; it’s a team effort.
- The Villain: Slugworth is still there, but he’s given a bit more of a "cartoon villain" edge to match the Tom and Jerry vibe.
- The Ending: The core message remains—staying honest and kind—but with an added layer of "don't kill the cat."
The Legacy of the "Direct-to-Video" Era
This movie represents the end of an era. Shortly after its release, the focus shifted toward big theatrical reboots (like the 2021 Tom & Jerry movie) and streaming exclusives. These weird mashups were the bread and butter of the DVD bargain bin for a decade. They are relics of a time when studios weren't afraid to just throw two random things in a blender to see if kids would watch it.
Honestly, the animation industry has moved on. We’re seeing more "prestige" animation now. But there's a certain charm to the sheer audacity of Tom and Jerry: Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. It doesn't care about your nostalgia. It just wants to show you a cat falling into a chocolate river.
🔗 Read more: Who is Really in the Enola Holmes 2 Cast? A Look at the Faces Behind the Mystery
If you’re a fan of animation history or just want to see something that feels like a fever dream, it’s worth a watch. Just don’t expect it to replace the Gene Wilder version in your heart. It’s a side quest. A weird, sugary, slightly confusing side quest.
What to Do Next
If you're curious about this weird corner of animation, don't just stop at the Wonka crossover. To really understand how we got here, you should track down the Tom and Jerry: Robin Hood and His Merry Mouse or the Wizard of Oz crossover. Comparing the three shows a clear evolution in how Warner Bros. tried to "modernize" their classic shorts.
Check out the original 1940s shorts directed by Hanna-Barbera first to see the peak of the characters' physical comedy. Then, watch the Wonka movie. The contrast in animation quality and comedic timing is an education in itself. It teaches you exactly what makes the original "Golden Age" animation so special—and why it’s so hard to replicate, even with a massive budget and a famous candy factory as a backdrop.
Look for the "Making of" segments if you can find them on old physical discs; the artists often talk about the difficulty of rotoscoping or matching the camera angles of the 1971 film, which is a legitimate technical hurdle most people overlook.