In 1791, a skinny, intense Englishman named Thomas Paine released a book that basically set the world on fire. It wasn't a novel. It wasn't a poem. It was Thomas Paine Rights of Man, a blistering defense of the French Revolution that ended up getting him tried for treason in absentia. Honestly, if you think political Twitter is toxic today, you haven't seen the 18th-century pamphlet wars. Paine wasn't just writing for academics; he was writing for the guy at the pub and the woman at the market. He wrote with a kind of raw, jagged energy that made the British monarchy absolutely lose its mind.
He didn't care about "tradition." He didn't care about "hereditary wisdom."
Paine believed that every generation should be free to act for itself. He thought the idea of a "dead hand" reaching out from the past to govern the living was total nonsense. Most people know him for Common Sense, the pamphlet that helped kickstart the American Revolution, but his work on the rights of man was arguably more radical. It took the fight directly to Edmund Burke, the heavyweight champion of conservative thought, and ripped apart the idea that kings had some mystical right to rule just because their great-great-grandfathers were good at killing people.
The Feud That Changed Everything
It all started because Edmund Burke, a guy who had actually supported the American Revolution, suddenly got cold feet when the French started hauling off their aristocrats. Burke wrote Reflections on the Revolution in France, basically arguing that society is a delicate fabric and if you pull one thread—like, say, the monarchy—the whole thing unravels. He loved the "sublime" nature of the crown.
Paine's response? He basically laughed in Burke's face.
In Thomas Paine Rights of Man, he famously wrote that Burke "pitied the plumage, but forgot the dying bird." It's one of those lines that hits you in the gut. Paine was saying that Burke was so obsessed with the fancy rituals and golden carriages of the French court that he completely ignored the fact that the French people were literally starving to death in the streets.
The book isn't just a rebuttal, though. It’s a blueprint.
💡 You might also like: Wire brush for cleaning: What most people get wrong about choosing the right bristles
Paine splits the work into two parts. The first is a dense, philosophical takedown of monarchy. He argues that rights aren't something a government gives you. They are inherent. You have them because you exist. Government is just a "necessary evil" (his words) that we set up to protect those rights. If the government stops doing that, you don't just have a right to change it—you have a duty to.
Why Part Two Was Even Riskier
While Part One was about philosophy, Part Two was about the "how-to." This is where Paine gets really spicy. He starts talking about wealth redistribution, universal education, and old-age pensions. In the 1790s, this was basically like suggesting we all move to Mars and live in communal bubbles. It was unheard of.
He looked at the massive amounts of money the British government was spending on wars and royal weddings and suggested, hey, maybe we use that to help the poor? He proposed a graduated income tax. He wanted to give money to families to help them educate their kids. He even suggested a welfare state for the elderly so they wouldn't have to die in a workhouse.
The British government’s reaction was predictable: they banned the book. They burned it in the streets. They issued a warrant for Paine's arrest. If he hadn't escaped to France—literally minutes before the authorities arrived—he probably would have ended up on a gallows.
Breaking Down the Core Arguments of Thomas Paine Rights of Man
To really get why this book still matters, you have to look at how Paine redefined the word "citizen." Before this, you were a "subject." A subject obeys. A citizen participates.
- Hereditary succession is a joke. Paine pointed out that if you wouldn't pick a doctor based on who his father was, why on earth would you pick a leader that way? It's a simple, devastating analogy.
- The living vs. the dead. He argued that no parliament or generation has the right to bind posterity forever. Every age must be free to make its own laws.
- The origin of rights. He traces rights back to creation. He argues that since all men are born equal, no one has a natural right to set up their family in perpetual power over others.
It’s easy to forget how dangerous these ideas were.
📖 Related: Images of Thanksgiving Holiday: What Most People Get Wrong
We take for granted that we can vote or criticize the government. In 1791, saying these things out loud was an act of revolution. Paine was stripping away the "mystery" of government. He wanted people to see the state for what it was: a management committee for the public good, not a divinely ordained hierarchy.
The French Revolution Connection
You can't talk about Thomas Paine Rights of Man without talking about the chaos in Paris. Paine actually went there. He was elected to the National Convention, despite not speaking a word of French. He sat there while they debated the fate of King Louis XVI.
Ironically, the man who wrote the most famous defense of the Revolution ended up in a French prison. Why? Because he wasn't radical enough for the Jacobins. Paine argued against executing the King. He thought they should just exile him to America. Robespierre didn't like that. Paine spent nearly a year in the Luxembourg Prison, narrowly escaping the guillotine by a literal fluke of a chalk mark on a door.
This adds a layer of complexity to his writing. He wasn't some ivory tower philosopher. He was a guy who lived through the terror he helped inspire, yet he never backed down from the core principles of his book. He believed the idea of the revolution was right, even if the execution (pun intended) was becoming a nightmare.
Misconceptions About Paine’s "Atheism"
A lot of people today—and definitely people back then—called Paine an atheist. They used this to discredit his political views. Honestly, it’s a bit of a stretch. Paine was a Deist. He believed in a Creator, but he absolutely detested organized religion and "priestcraft."
In Rights of Man, he argues that religious freedom is a fundamental right. Not just the freedom to practice your own religion, but the freedom from having someone else's religion shoved down your throat by the state. He saw the alliance between Church and State as a tool of oppression. If the King is "God's anointed," then questioning the King is a sin. Paine wanted to break that link.
👉 See also: Why Everyone Is Still Obsessing Over Maybelline SuperStay Skin Tint
The Economic Radicalism Nobody Talks About
We usually focus on the "democracy" part of Paine's work, but his economic ideas in Part Two were arguably more influential in the long run. He was one of the first people to suggest that poverty wasn't a "natural" state or a punishment from God. He saw it as a failure of government.
He proposed:
- Direct cash transfers to the poor for child education.
- Pensions for people over the age of 50.
- State-funded funerals for the indigent.
- Work programs for the unemployed in London.
Think about that. This was 150 years before the New Deal or the modern British Welfare State. He even calculated the math, showing how cutting military spending by just a fraction could fund all of it. He was a policy wonk with the soul of a revolutionary.
Why You Should Still Care Today
The world has changed, but the tensions Paine highlighted in Thomas Paine Rights of Man haven't gone anywhere. We still argue about whether "traditional" values should trump modern needs. We still argue about how much of our taxes should go to social safety nets versus the military.
Paine’s writing style is a lesson in itself. He didn't use Latin. He didn't use flowery, poetic metaphors like Burke. He used "plain English." He wanted to be understood by the "vulgar," which was the elitist term for the working class at the time. He proved that complex political ideas don't have to be wrapped in academic jargon to be powerful.
If you're feeling cynical about politics, reading Paine is a bit like getting a shot of adrenaline. He’s cranky, he’s idealistic, and he’s incredibly smart. He reminds us that the status quo isn't inevitable.
Actionable Insights for the Modern Reader
If you want to apply the spirit of Thomas Paine Rights of Man to your own life or work, start with these steps:
- Question the "Because we've always done it this way" excuse. Whether in your business or your local government, demand a functional reason for traditions that no longer serve people.
- Practice "Plain English" communication. Paine’s power came from his accessibility. If you can’t explain your idea to a 12-year-old, you probably don't understand it well enough yourself.
- Audit your "inherent" vs. "granted" rights. Look at the systems you operate in (work, social groups, etc.). Are you being treated as a "subject" who receives permissions, or a "member" with inherent standing?
- Read the primary source. Don't just take a summary's word for it. Download a free PDF of Rights of Man and read the first 20 pages. The sheer sass in his tone toward Edmund Burke is worth the price of admission alone.