Blue hair. Red onesies. Total chaos. You know exactly who I’m talking about. Honestly, it is pretty wild that two characters who don't even have real names—just numbers stamped on their chests—have managed to stay culturally relevant for nearly 70 years. When Dr. Seuss first introduced Thing 1 and Thing 2 in the 1957 classic The Cat in the Hat, he wasn't just trying to fill pages with weird drawings. He was tapping into something deep about the human psyche, specifically that little bit of "unrestrained ID" we all carry around.
They’re a mess.
They fly kites in the house. They knock over lamps. They basically represent every parent's worst nightmare and every child's secret fantasy of total, consequence-free destruction. But if you look closer at the history of these two, there is a lot more going on than just some vintage literary slapstick.
The Secret Origin of Thing 1 and Thing 2
The Cat in the Hat didn't just appear out of thin air. In the mid-1950s, there was this massive panic in the United States about "why Johnny can't read." A 1954 article in Life magazine actually blamed boring school primers like Dick and Jane for making kids hate reading. William Spaulding, who was an executive at Houghton Mifflin, challenged Theodor Geisel (Dr. Seuss) to write a book that "six-year-olds couldn't put down."
He gave Geisel a list of about 250 words that every first grader should know and told him to limit the book to those. Geisel famously struggled with this. He spent nine months trying to figure it out. Eventually, he saw two things that sparked the idea: a cat and a hat. But the story needed a catalyst for the "peak" of the mess, and that is where Thing 1 and Thing 2 came in.
👉 See also: Aloe Vera Hair Oil: Why Most People Are Doing It Wrong
They were designed to be the physical embodiment of a "mess." They are "Things." They aren't humans, animals, or even quite monsters. They are just pure, distilled energy.
Why Do They Look So Weird?
Have you ever noticed that they look exactly alike? That’s not just laziness on Geisel’s part. By making them identical twins, he removed their individuality. They don't have personalities; they have a function. That function is to do exactly what they want, when they want.
The wild blue hair was a conscious choice. In the 1950s, printing color was expensive and limited. Geisel used a very specific palette: red, white, blue, and black. This wasn't just about patriotism; it was about visual impact. The bright red of their jumpsuits against the pale, manic blue of their hair creates a visual vibration that makes them look like they are constantly moving, even when they are just standing on a printed page.
The Psychological Layer: Are We All Just "Things"?
Psychologists have had a field day with these two over the decades. Some people see them as the "Id" in the Freudian sense—the part of our mind that wants immediate gratification. The Cat in the Hat is the "Ego," trying to balance the fun with the reality of the situation (the mess). The Fish? Well, the Fish is the "Superego," the nagging voice of morality and rules.
When the Cat brings in the big red box and lets Thing 1 and Thing 2 out, he’s essentially letting chaos into a structured environment. It’s a classic storytelling trope. But what makes it "human" is the reaction of the kids. They don't immediately join in. They watch in a mix of horror and fascination.
We’ve all felt that. You’re at a party, or maybe a meeting, and someone starts saying the thing everyone is thinking but nobody is supposed to say. That person is Thing 1. They are the disruption we secretly crave but are too scared to initiate ourselves.
How the Live Action Movie Changed Everything (For Better or Worse)
We have to talk about the 2003 live-action movie starring Mike Myers. It’s... polarizing. To say the least.
In the original book, the Things are almost like sprites or magical beings. In the movie, they were played by Dan Castellaneta (the voice of Homer Simpson) and provided a much more "gross-out" humor vibe. This version of the characters added a layer of slapstick that wasn't really in the book. While the book version of the Things felt like a force of nature, the movie version felt like two rowdy teenagers.
🔗 Read more: At What Temperature Does Beer Freeze and Explode: The Science of Your Ruined Party
Many Dr. Seuss purists hated it. However, it’s because of that movie that a whole new generation became obsessed with the imagery. If you go to a Halloween party today, you are almost guaranteed to see two best friends or a couple dressed in red shirts with "Thing 1" and "Thing 2" circles taped to their chests. It’s the ultimate low-effort, high-recognition costume.
The Business of Chaos
The branding of these characters is a juggernaut. Dr. Seuss Enterprises, which manages the late author’s estate, has licensed Thing 1 and Thing 2 for everything from infant onesies to high-end collectibles.
- Apparel: It’s a staple for twins. If you have twins, someone will buy you those outfits. It’s a law of nature.
- Theme Parks: At Universal Studios' Islands of Adventure in Orlando, there is an entire "Seuss Landing" area. You can meet the Things in person. They usually run around, cause "trouble," and refuse to stand still for photos.
- Educational Tools: Ironically, characters designed to destroy things are now used to teach kids how to read and follow directions.
There's a weird irony in using characters that represent rebellion to teach conformity, but it works because kids identify with the joy of the characters.
Misconceptions: What People Get Wrong
One of the biggest misconceptions is that the Things are "evil." They aren't. They are "tame." The Cat explicitly says, "They are tame. Oh, so tame!"
They don't have malice. They don't want to hurt Sally or her brother. They just want to play. The conflict in the story doesn't come from their bad intentions; it comes from the fact that their version of "play" isn't compatible with the rules of a domestic household. It’s a lesson in boundaries, not a battle between good and evil.
Another weird thing? People often think there are more than two. While the book only features two, the concept has been expanded in spin-offs and cartoons to include a whole "Thing" family. But in the original canon, it's just the duo.
The Cultural Legacy of the "Thing"
Why do we still care? Honestly, because life is stressful.
As adults, we spend our entire lives cleaning up messes—both literal and metaphorical. We pay taxes, we fold laundry, we answer emails. Thing 1 and Thing 2 represent the total rejection of that responsibility. They are the patron saints of the "unfiltered self."
When you see a picture of them, or see someone wearing the shirt, it’s a little nod to the fact that we all know how much work it is to keep the "mess" inside the box. They remind us that sometimes, you just want to fly a kite in the living room and see what happens.
Actionable Steps for Parents and Teachers
If you’re using these characters to engage with kids or just want to celebrate the legacy, here’s how to do it effectively:
📖 Related: Why Bricks and Minifigs Lomita Is Actually the Best Spot for LEGO Fans in SoCal
- Focus on the "Why": When reading the book with kids, ask them why the Things are making a mess. Is it because they are mean, or because they are bored? It’s a great way to talk about empathy and consequences.
- Creative Outlets: Use the "Thing" persona for "controlled chaos" time. Set a timer for 10 minutes where kids can be as loud and messy as they want (within reason), and then have a "Cat in the Hat" cleanup session afterward.
- DIY Costumes: If you're doing the costume route, don't buy the cheap polyester ones. Get a comfortable red sweatshirt and use felt for the logo. It looks more "authentic" to the hand-drawn style of the original illustrations.
- Check the Source: Go back and read the original 1957 text. You’ll be surprised at how much of the story you’ve probably misremembered through the lens of pop culture.
Ultimately, the reason Thing 1 and Thing 2 remain icons is that they aren't just characters; they are an experience. They are the reminder that life is messy, and while we eventually have to put the "Things" back in the box, the house is a little more interesting because they were there.