Look up at the night sky. It’s quiet, right? Cold. Empty. But about 13.8 billion years ago, everything you see—every star, every phone screen, every atom in your coffee—was squeezed into a speck smaller than a single pore on your skin. It sounds like science fiction. Honestly, it sounds like a fever dream. But the theories of the origin of the universe are grounded in some of the most rigorous, mind-bending math ever scribbled on a chalkboard.
We used to think the universe was static. Constant. Eternal. Einstein himself originally fell for that one, even though his own equations hinted otherwise. Then Edwin Hubble noticed that galaxies aren't just sitting there; they’re hauling away from us. If things are moving apart now, they must have been closer together yesterday. Go back far enough, and you hit the "Start" button.
The Big Bang is the heavyweight champion for a reason
Most people think the Big Bang was an explosion. It wasn't. An explosion implies stuff flying into pre-existing space. Instead, the Big Bang was the rapid expansion of space itself. Think of an inflating balloon where the rubber is the fabric of reality.
In the first trillionth of a trillionth of a second—a period called "Inflation"—the universe expanded faster than the speed of light. Physicist Alan Guth proposed this to solve a few nagging problems, like why the universe looks the same in every direction. It’s like stretching a wrinkled sheet so fast that it suddenly looks perfectly flat.
We have receipts for this. The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) is the "afterglow" of the Big Bang. It’s a faint hum of radiation that fills the entire sky, discovered almost by accident in 1964 by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson. They thought their radio antenna was broken or covered in pigeon droppings. Nope. It was the echo of the birth of everything.
Why some people still doubt it
The Big Bang is great, but it has a massive hole: the Singularity.
At the very beginning, the math breaks. Density becomes infinite. Heat becomes infinite. When your math spits out "infinity," it usually means your theory is missing a piece of the puzzle. We can track the universe back to a fraction of a second after the start, but that absolute "zero point" remains a total mystery. It's why we’re seeing a surge in alternative theories of the origin of the universe that try to bypass that messy starting line.
What if there was no beginning?
The Steady State theory is the old-school rival. It suggests the universe has always existed and always will. To account for the expansion Hubble saw, this theory argues that new matter is constantly being "created" out of nothing to keep the density the same. It’s a comfortable thought. No start, no end. Just a forever-loop of existence.
🔗 Read more: Who is my ISP? How to find out and why you actually need to know
But it failed. It couldn't explain the CMB radiation, and it couldn't explain why we see younger galaxies far away but not nearby.
Then you’ve got the Big Bounce. This is the idea that the universe is like a lung. It expands, reaches a limit, collapses back into a "Big Crunch," and then bounces back out again. We might be in the 50th version of the universe. Or the trillionth. This model uses "Loop Quantum Gravity" to suggest that space is made of discrete chunks, and you can’t squeeze those chunks into an infinite point. They eventually push back.
The Multiverse and the "Bubble" problem
This is where things get weird. Really weird.
Some physicists, like Andrei Linde, suggest that our Big Bang was just a tiny event in a much larger, eternally inflating sea. In this "Eternal Inflation" model, "bubbles" are constantly popping up. Each bubble is a universe. Ours just happens to have the right physics for life.
In another bubble, gravity might be so weak that stars never form. In another, atoms might not stick together. We’re just the lucky ones living in the bubble that didn't pop or stay dark. It’s a controversial take because it’s almost impossible to prove. If these other universes are outside our "light cone," we can’t see them. Ever.
The Simulation Theory (The tech-bro favorite)
Okay, it’s not strictly a "physics" theory in the traditional sense, but it’s gained massive traction in the last decade. Nick Bostrom, an Oxford philosopher, famously argued that if any civilization ever reaches a "post-human" stage where they can run hyper-realistic simulations, they’ll probably run thousands of them. Statistically, that means we are more likely to be the "sim" than the "original."
While it sounds like The Matrix, some scientists are looking for "pixels" in reality—tiny, fundamental limits to how small things can get (the Planck length) that might act like the resolution of a computer program.
💡 You might also like: Why the CH 46E Sea Knight Helicopter Refused to Quit
Dark Matter and Dark Energy: The 95% we can’t see
We talk about stars and planets, but that’s only about 5% of what’s out there. The rest is Dark Matter and Dark Energy.
- Dark Matter is the invisible glue holding galaxies together. Without it, they’d fly apart.
- Dark Energy is the "anti-gravity" pushing the universe apart at an accelerating rate.
If Dark Energy keeps winning the tug-of-war, we’re headed for the "Big Freeze." Stars will burn out. Black holes will evaporate. The universe will become a cold, dark, empty void where nothing ever happens again. It’s a bit of a bummer, honestly.
Common misconceptions about the start of it all
People often ask: "What was the universe expanding into?"
The answer is... nothing. There was no "outside." Space itself was being created. It’s a concept that makes your brain itch because we are evolved to understand three dimensions and a linear timeline. Thinking about the "outside" of the universe is like asking what is North of the North Pole. The question doesn't actually make sense in the context of the geometry.
Another one? "The Big Bang was loud."
Sound needs a medium, like air or water, to travel through. The early universe was a thick plasma, so pressure waves (sound) did exist, but you wouldn't have heard a "bang." It would have been more of a deep, sub-bass hum that vibrated the fabric of reality itself.
How to actually wrap your head around this
You don't need a PhD to appreciate the scale of these theories of the origin of the universe, but you do need a bit of humility. We are monkeys on a rock trying to figure out the source code of existence.
📖 Related: What Does Geodesic Mean? The Math Behind Straight Lines on a Curvy Planet
If you want to dive deeper, don't just read pop-sci articles.
First step: Look into the "Hubble Tension." It’s a current crisis in cosmology where different ways of measuring the expansion of the universe are giving different results. It might mean the Big Bang theory needs a major software update.
Second step: Check out the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) data. It’s finding "impossible" galaxies that formed way earlier than our current models say they should have. We are living through a period where the textbooks are being rewritten in real-time.
Third step: Download an app like Stellarium. Seeing where these distant galaxies actually sit in the sky makes the math feel a lot more real.
The universe isn't just "out there." We are a way for the cosmos to know itself, as Sagan used to say. Whether it started with a bang, a bounce, or a line of code, the fact that we can even ask the question is the most incredible part of the whole story.
Actionable Next Steps
- Research the Hubble Tension to understand why our current measurements of the universe don't match up.
- Follow the NASA JWST blog for weekly updates on ancient galaxies that are challenging the standard Big Bang model.
- Read "The First Three Minutes" by Steven Weinberg for a classic, detailed breakdown of the immediate aftermath of the universe's birth.