The Women of the Manson Family: Why They Did It and What Happened to Them

The Women of the Manson Family: Why They Did It and What Happened to Them

It started with a song and a hitchhiker. You’ve probably seen the photos—those black-and-white mugshots of young women with "X" marks carved into their foreheads, laughing like they knew a secret the rest of the world didn't. They were the women of the Manson Family, and even fifty years later, we still can’t quite look away. Why? Because they weren't the monsters we wanted them to be. They were middle-class daughters, honor students, and librarians.

Charles Manson didn't kill anyone during the Tate-LaBianca murders of August 1969. He didn't have to. He had a group of young women who were willing to do it for him. People usually focus on Charlie’s failed music career or his obsession with the Beatles’ White Album, but the real engine of the "Family" was the women. Without them, Manson was just a charismatic ex-con with a guitar. With them, he was the leader of a cult that defined the end of the 1960s.

The Recruitment: How Charlie Picked the Women of the Manson Family

Charlie didn't go for "bad" girls. He went for the lost ones.

Mary Brunner was the first. She was a librarian at UC Berkeley, a straight-laced young woman who met Manson in 1967. Think about that for a second. A librarian. She gave him a place to stay, and she eventually gave him a son. She was the "Mother Mary" of the group. From there, the circle grew. Lynette "Squeaky" Fromme was a teenager who’d been kicked out of her house. Patricia Krenwinkel was a secretary. Susan Atkins was a drifter who had lost her mother to cancer.

They were basically looking for a father figure, and Charlie played the part perfectly. He used a mix of LSD, isolation at Spahn Ranch, and constant "ego-stripping" to break them down. He told them they were beautiful. He told them the world was ending. Most importantly, he told them they were free. It’s a bit ironic, isn't it? They thought they were escaping the "Establishment" only to end up in a much tighter, deadlier cage.

At Spahn Ranch, life was weird. It was a dusty, old movie set where they spent their days taking care of horses and their nights listening to Manson’s sermons. The women of the Manson Family did the heavy lifting. They scavenged for food in grocery store dumpsters—what they called "garbage tripping." They sewed clothes. They took care of the many babies born into the commune.

The Core Circle: Linda, Sadie, Katie, and Lulu

When people talk about the murders, four names usually come up.

🔗 Read more: Anjelica Huston in The Addams Family: What You Didn't Know About Morticia

Susan Atkins, known as "Sadie Mae Glutz," was perhaps the most frightening. During the trial, she bragged about the killings. She told her cellmates that she killed Sharon Tate because she was tired of hearing her beg for her life. It was chilling. She showed no remorse, at least not then. She’d dance and sing on her way to the courtroom, treating the whole thing like a macabre performance.

Patricia Krenwinkel, or "Katie," was different. She was a quiet girl from a stable home. Yet, on the night of the murders, she was relentless. She chased Abigail Folger across the lawn of the Tate residence. Decades later, during her parole hearings, she’d talk about how she was just a "hollow shell" back then, a girl who had completely lost herself in Manson's shadow.

Leslie Van Houten, "Lulu," was the youngest. She wasn't even at the Tate house; she only participated in the second night of murders at the LaBianca home. For years, her legal team argued she was too young and too drugged to be fully responsible. She was the "homecoming queen" who went wrong. Of all the women of the Manson Family, she was often seen as the most redeemable, though that's a tough sell when you're talking about multiple stabbings.

Then there’s Linda Kasabian. She was the whistleblower. She stood watch while the others went inside. She heard the screams. She was the one who eventually turned state's evidence, granting her immunity. Without her testimony, prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi might never have secured those first-degree murder convictions. She lived the rest of her life in hiding, rightfully terrified of the Family members who remained free.

The Trial and the "X" on the Forehead

The trial was a circus.

You had these women—Susan, Patricia, and Leslie—shaving their heads in solidarity with Charlie. They carved "X"s into their foreheads because Manson did it first. They said they had "X'ed themselves out of the world." They’d sit in the courtroom and giggle while the most horrific evidence was presented.

💡 You might also like: Isaiah Washington Movies and Shows: Why the Star Still Matters

It was a PR nightmare for the hippie movement. Suddenly, every kid with long hair and a van looked like a potential killer. The women of the Manson Family effectively ended the "Summer of Love." They proved that the counterculture could be just as violent and manipulative as the system it was trying to replace.

Squeaky Fromme and the Red Robes

Not all the women were involved in the 1969 murders. Lynette "Squeaky" Fromme stayed loyal to Manson long after he went to prison. She became the de facto leader of the remaining Family members.

In 1975, she took it to another level. She tried to assassinate President Gerald Ford in Sacramento. She wore a bright red robe and pulled a Colt .45. Luckily, she didn't have a round in the chamber. When she was tackled, she supposedly said, "It didn't go off. Can you believe it?" She spent decades in prison, never truly renouncing Manson until much, much later, if at all. She was the true believer, the one who stayed in the woods, waiting for a revolution that was never going to happen.

Where Are They Now?

Death and parole. That’s the short version.

Susan Atkins died in prison in 2009. She’d become a born-again Christian and spent her final years fighting for a compassionate release that never came. She was the longest-serving female inmate in California at the time of her death.

Leslie Van Houten was finally released on parole in 2023. It took five decades and dozens of hearings. The governors of California—both Brown and Newsom—repeatedly blocked her release, despite the parole board recommending it. Her release sparked a massive debate. Can someone truly be rehabilitated after participating in such a crime? Or does the nature of the act mean you lose your right to walk free forever?

📖 Related: Temuera Morrison as Boba Fett: Why Fans Are Still Divided Over the Daimyo of Tatooine

Patricia Krenwinkel remains behind bars. She is currently the longest-serving female inmate in the California correctional system. She’s often described as a model prisoner, but like the others, the weight of 1969 is a heavy burden to overcome in the eyes of the public and the law.

Understanding the Psychology: It Wasn't Just "Brainwashing"

We like the word "brainwashing" because it makes us feel safe. It suggests that these women were victims who had no choice. But modern psychologists like Janja Lalich, an expert on cults, suggest it's more complicated. It’s "bounded choice."

Manson created a closed system. He controlled the food, the drugs, the sleep, and the social approval. If you did what Charlie wanted, you were loved. If you didn't, you were humiliated. For the women of the Manson Family, the Spahn Ranch was their entire universe. When you’re in a bubble like that, reality starts to warp. You start to believe that killing "piggies" is a revolutionary act that will save the world from a race war Manson called "Helter Skelter."

It's a cautionary tale about the need for belonging. Most of these women were looking for a family. They found one, but it was a nightmare.

Actionable Insights for Researching Dark History

If you’re digging deeper into the history of the Manson Family or cult psychology, don't just stick to the sensational headlines. Here is how to actually understand the nuance:

  • Read the Court Transcripts: Skip the documentaries for a second. Read the actual testimonies of Linda Kasabian and Susan Atkins. The raw details are much more revealing than a narrated script.
  • Study the "Coercive Control" Model: Look into the work of Dr. Alexandra Stein. She explains how charismatic leaders use disorganized attachment to bond followers to them through fear and love simultaneously.
  • Contextualize the Era: You can't understand the Family without understanding the 1969 zeitgeist—the Vietnam War, the civil rights movement, and the massive drug culture. It was a pressure cooker.
  • Check the Parole Hearing Records: These are public documents. They provide the most recent insights into the mental states of the surviving members. It’s where they actually have to speak about their crimes without the "Family" filter.

The story of the women of the Manson Family isn't just a true crime trope. It’s a study in how easily the human desire for community can be weaponized. They weren't born killers; they were made into them in the dusty hills of California, under the influence of a man who knew exactly which heartstrings to pull.