Movies about serial killers are everywhere. You can't scroll through Netflix without tripping over a new true crime docuseries or a gritty dramatization of a 1970s cold case. But Woman of the Hour feels different. It’s Anna Kendrick’s directorial debut, and honestly, she nails a specific kind of dread that most "slasher" flicks miss entirely. If you're looking for a Woman of the Hour parents guide, you probably want to know if this is just another gore-fest or something much more psychological.
It’s about Rodney Alcala. Specifically, it’s about the time he appeared on The Dating Game in 1978 while he was in the middle of a literal murder spree. It sounds like a fake Hollywood pitch, but it’s real. Scary real.
What is Woman of the Hour actually about?
The film follows Cheryl Bradshaw, played by Kendrick. She’s a struggling actress in Los Angeles. To get her face out there, she agrees to be the "bachelorette" on a popular game show. One of the three men behind the partition is Rodney Alcala (Daniel Zovatto). The movie jumps between the game show's bright, tacky neon lights and Alcala’s dark, horrifying encounters with women outside the studio.
It isn't a traditional biography. It’s a snapshot of systemic failure. You see how easy it was for a predator to hide in plain sight because people—mostly men in power—just weren't paying attention.
The rating and what it really means for kids
The film is rated R. In the US, that’s usually a big red flag for parents. Here, the R rating isn't for "fun" action or constant swearing. It’s for the heavy, suffocating atmosphere of violence and the sexual undertones of Alcala’s crimes.
If your teenager is a true crime fan, they've likely seen worse on YouTube or TikTok. However, the way violence is portrayed here is meant to be disturbing, not entertaining. There is a massive difference between a superhero movie explosion and the slow, methodical way this film depicts a predator cornering a victim.
Violence and Gore: The Nitty-Gritty
Let’s talk about the blood. Or the lack of it. Kendrick makes a deliberate choice here. She doesn't lean into the "torture porn" tropes that defined the early 2000s. You aren't going to see intestines or hyper-realistic dismemberment.
📖 Related: Gwendoline Butler Dead in a Row: Why This 1957 Mystery Still Packs a Punch
Instead, you see the struggle.
The violence is brief but incredibly impactful. There are scenes of strangulation. There are scenes where Alcala manipulates women into remote locations. The camera often lingers on the victim’s face rather than the act of violence itself. This makes it feel much more intimate and, frankly, much more upsetting than a standard horror movie. For a younger viewer, this psychological weight might be harder to process than a bucket of fake blood.
- Strangulation: This is the primary form of violence shown. It is depicted as a tool of control.
- Physical Assault: Some scenes involve blunt force, though much of the "impact" happens just off-screen or is muffled.
- The "Aftermath": We see the bodies of victims. They aren't "beautified" or stylized. They look like discarded people, which is exactly the point the film is trying to make about Alcala’s worldview.
Sexual Content and Language
There is no explicit nudity in Woman of the Hour. You won't find a graphic sex scene that makes everyone in the living room look at their phones in awkward silence.
But.
The entire movie is drenched in sexual threat. Alcala’s primary motivation is a twisted, violent sexual power. There are references to sexual assault and rape. While the acts aren't shown in a graphic, pornographic way, the intent is always present.
As for language, there's a fair amount of swearing. F-bombs appear. It’s the kind of language you’d expect in a gritty 1970s period piece. It feels natural to the setting, but if you have a strict "no profanity" rule in your house, this movie definitely breaks it.
👉 See also: Why ASAP Rocky F kin Problems Still Runs the Club Over a Decade Later
Why the psychological "crepiness" is the real hurdle
Honestly? The most "adult" part of this movie is the gaslighting.
There is a scene on the set of The Dating Game where the producers tell Cheryl to "smile more" and be less "intellectual." They want her to be a prop. This mirrors how Alcala treats his victims—as objects to be manipulated.
For a 14-year-old, the nuance of this social commentary might fly over their head. Or, it might make them incredibly uncomfortable. The film highlights how society ignores "red flags" because a guy is charming or handsome. Watching Alcala turn his charm on and off like a light switch is chilling. Daniel Zovatto’s performance is haunting because he isn't a snarling monster; he’s a guy who looks like he belongs in a folk-rock band.
That "stranger danger" element is dialed up to eleven. It might trigger anxiety in sensitive viewers who aren't used to the "slow burn" style of thriller.
Essential Talking Points for Parents and Teens
If you do decide to let your older teen watch this, it’s a massive teaching moment. It’s not just a movie; it’s a history lesson on how the justice system and media failed women for decades.
- The "Vibe" Check: Talk about why Cheryl felt uncomfortable during the date. Even though Alcala didn't pull a knife on her immediately, her "gut feeling" was right. This is a great opening to talk about trusting one's instincts in uncomfortable social situations.
- Historical Context: Explain that Rodney Alcala was a real person. He was a convicted sex offender before he went on the show. Why didn't the producers check? It opens up a conversation about how much easier it was to disappear or hide a criminal past before the internet.
- Media Ethics: The show wanted ratings. They didn't care about Cheryl’s safety. How does that compare to modern reality TV or social media influencers today?
Is it okay for a 13-year-old?
Probably not.
✨ Don't miss: Ashley My 600 Pound Life Now: What Really Happened to the Show’s Most Memorable Ashleys
Even if they’ve seen Stranger Things or Scream, the themes in Woman of the Hour are much more grounded in reality. There are no monsters to hide behind. The monster is just a man with a camera.
For most parents, the "sweet spot" for this film is likely 16 and up. By that age, most students have a better grasp of the historical and social themes Kendrick is exploring. They can handle the grim reality of the subject matter without being purely traumatized by the violence.
Real-world facts to keep in mind
It's worth noting that the film takes some creative liberties. In real life, Cheryl Bradshaw didn't just have a "bad feeling" during the taping—she actually went on a date with him afterwards but found him so "creepy" that she refused to see him again. The film condenses this timeline to make it more dramatic.
Also, Alcala was a prolific photographer. He used his camera as a way to lure victims by offering to take their pictures for their "portfolio." This is a major plot point in the movie and serves as a stark warning about the "modeling scout" trope that predators still use today.
Actionable insights for your movie night
If you're still on the fence, here’s a quick breakdown of how to handle the viewing experience:
- Watch the trailer first: Not just for the plot, but for the tone. If the trailer makes you feel physically tight in the chest, the movie will be ten times worse.
- Check the "Parental Guidance" settings: If you're watching on Netflix, ensure you haven't blocked R-rated content, or you'll be scrambling for a password mid-intro.
- Don't watch it late at night: This isn't a "popcorn and chill" movie. It’s heavy. You’ll want some daylight after the credits roll to decompress.
- Focus on the "Why": Remind your teen that the movie was made to honor the victims and highlight the flaws in the system, not to glorify the killer.
To get the most out of the experience, look up the actual footage of Rodney Alcala on The Dating Game after watching. Seeing the real-life contrast between the smiling, laughing man on the grainy 70s footage and the reality of his crimes is the most powerful lesson the film offers. It reinforces the idea that evil doesn't always look like a villain in a cape—sometimes, it looks like the guy in the seat next to you.