It was just a minute of footage. Actually, it wasn't even a full minute—only 56 seconds of grainy, 2007-era digital camera video showing two brothers on a sofa. One baby, one toddler. One finger, one bite. Most people who clicked on Charlie bit my finger back in the day probably didn't think they were watching history. They were just watching a kid named Harry get his finger chomped on by his younger brother, Charlie.
But it blew up.
It didn't just "go viral" in the way we think of TikToks today. It became a foundational pillar of the early social web. For years, it held the title of the most-viewed non-music video on YouTube. It was a cultural reset for how we consume "cute" content. Honestly, looking back at it now, the video feels like a time capsule of a simpler internet, before everything became over-produced and algorithm-chasing.
The accidental origins of Harry and Charlie
Howard Davies-Carr, the father of the boys, didn't set out to make a masterpiece. He just wanted to capture a moment to send to the boys' grandfather in the United States. The file was too big for email. In 2007, that was a genuine technical hurdle. So, he uploaded it to this relatively new site called YouTube.
He almost deleted it.
The video shows Harry, then aged three, putting his finger into the mouth of one-year-old Charlie. Charlie bites. Harry laughs. Charlie bites again, harder this time. Harry lets out that iconic, slightly melodic "Ouch! Charlie! Charlie, that really hurt!" It ends with Charlie's mischievous, toothless grin and Harry admitting, "Charlie bit me."
What’s fascinating is that the video sat there for months with almost no views. Then, seemingly out of nowhere, the "snowball effect" happened. By 2009, it was the king of the platform. It wasn't just a video; it was a phenomenon that birthed parodies, merch, and a new kind of celebrity.
Why Charlie bit my finger resonated across the globe
Why did this work?
There’s a specific psychological hook in the video. It’s the transition from laughter to genuine pain, followed by immediate forgiveness. It’s authentic. You can't script a toddler's reaction like that. In a world of heavily edited reality TV, which was the dominant media of the mid-2000s, this felt real.
👉 See also: Questions From Black Card Revoked: The Culture Test That Might Just Get You Roasted
The "Charlie bit my finger" appeal also crossed language barriers. You don’t need to speak English to understand a baby biting a finger and the older brother’s bewildered reaction. It’s a universal sibling dynamic. Experts in digital media often point to this video as the gold standard for "unintentional" viral success. There was no marketing budget. No influencer seeding. Just a raw human moment that people wanted to share with their friends.
The NFT controversy and the "death" of the YouTube version
Fast forward to May 2021. The internet was in the middle of an NFT (Non-Fungible Token) craze. The Davies-Carr family announced they were auctioning off the video as an NFT and would delete the original from YouTube forever.
People were furious.
It felt like a piece of internet history was being held for ransom. The auction eventually concluded with a bid of $760,999. The winner was an anonymous buyer identified only as "3FMusic." For a moment, it looked like the video would vanish into a private collection, accessible only to the highest bidder.
Thankfully, that didn't quite happen.
While the original upload was set to "unlisted" to preserve the value for the NFT owner, the family eventually kept it available for viewing in some capacities, and of course, thousands of re-uploads exist. But the move sparked a massive debate about digital ownership and the ethics of "selling" a viral moment that the public feels a collective sense of ownership over.
Where are Harry and Charlie Davies-Carr now?
They aren't babies anymore. That’s the most jarring part for anyone who remembers the 2007 launch. Harry and Charlie are young men now.
The family has been incredibly transparent about the financial side of things. They didn't just get the $760k from the NFT; they earned hundreds of thousands of dollars in ad revenue over the decade the video was live. That money went into the boys’ education and a pretty comfortable upbringing in Buckinghamshire, England.
✨ Don't miss: The Reality of Sex Movies From Africa: Censorship, Nollywood, and the Digital Underground
Harry has often joked in interviews about being the "victim" of the bite. Charlie, meanwhile, has leaned into his role as the legendary biter. They’ve appeared on The Ellen DeGeneres Show, done countless news segments, and even starred in commercials for brands like Delta Air Lines and Ragu.
Interestingly, the brothers seem remarkably well-adjusted. Usually, child stars of that magnitude burn out or struggle with the limelight. But because they were so young when it happened, and because their parents managed the "fame" with a level head, they’ve treated it more like a quirky family business than a life-defining identity.
The impact on the YouTube economy
Before Charlie bit my finger, nobody really knew if you could make a living on YouTube. This video proved that a single minute of footage could be worth millions. It paved the way for the "family vlogging" genre, for better or worse.
- It showed that "user-generated content" (UGC) could compete with professional TV.
- It established the template for the viral video life cycle: upload, viral explosion, media tour, monetization.
- It created a precedent for how families manage the digital footprint of their children.
Common misconceptions about the video
A lot of people think the video was staged. It wasn't. Howard Davies-Carr has gone on record many times explaining that he just happened to have the camera out because the boys were being cute.
Another myth is that the family "lost" the money or spent it all on cars. Actually, most of it was locked away in trust funds. They've been very conservative with the earnings.
Some people also believe the video was the first ever YouTube hit. It wasn't—that would be "Me at the zoo"—but it was arguably the first to reach a level of global saturation where grandmas in rural villages knew the catchphrase.
Why it couldn't happen today
If you uploaded Charlie bit my finger today, it would probably get buried.
The algorithm has changed. YouTube now prioritizes "watch time" and long-form content. A 56-second video doesn't keep people on the platform long enough to satisfy the current AI. We’ve moved into the era of the "Hook, Story, Call to Action" structure. The raw, unedited nature of the 2007 web has been replaced by high-definition, 4K, 60fps polished videos.
🔗 Read more: Alfonso Cuarón: Why the Harry Potter 3 Director Changed the Wizarding World Forever
There's something a little sad about that.
The accidental magic is gone. Now, if a kid bites another kid, parents are thinking about the "TikTok sound" or the "Reels transition" before they're even thinking about the memory itself. Charlie and Harry were the last of a dying breed: the accidental legends.
Actionable insights for digital creators
If you’re looking at this story and wondering how to replicate that success, you have to look at the underlying principles, not the specific act.
First, focus on high-emotion moments. Whether it's humor, shock, or cuteness, the "Charlie" video worked because it triggered an immediate emotional response. Second, keep it short. While the YouTube algorithm likes long videos, virality still thrives on brevity. Third, don't over-edit. There is a growing trend of "lo-fi" content because people are tired of the MrBeast-style hyper-editing. They want something that feels human.
To truly understand the legacy of this clip, you have to look at it as the birth of the "Creator Economy." It was the first time we saw that "regular" people could command more attention than a Hollywood studio.
If you want to dive deeper into the history of the early internet, you should look into the "YouTube Partners" program history. It was launched right as this video was peaking, which is exactly how the Davies-Carr family was able to turn views into a college fund. You can also explore the current state of the NFT market to see how other viral stars, like the "Disaster Girl" or "Overly Attached Girlfriend," followed in Charlie's footsteps to monetize their digital legacies.
Check the original family blog or their official YouTube channel for updates, as they still occasionally post "then and now" content that gives a peek into their lives today. Reading up on the "Right to be Forgotten" laws in the UK also provides a fascinating legal lens on how children like Harry and Charlie might view their digital permanence as they enter adulthood.