The Wars of the Roses: What Most People Get Wrong About England's Bloodiest Family Feud

The Wars of the Roses: What Most People Get Wrong About England's Bloodiest Family Feud

History isn't a straight line. It's a mess. When people talk about the Wars of the Roses, they usually picture two neat sides—Team Red Rose versus Team White Rose—clashing in muddy fields until someone wins. Honestly? It was nothing like that. It was a chaotic, thirty-year series of sporadic brawls, sudden betrayals, and massive identity crises for the English nobility.

Think of it as a family argument that got way out of hand. Like, "decapitating your cousin" out of hand.

Why the Wars of the Roses Started (And it Wasn't Just About a Crown)

The whole thing kicked off because Henry VI was, frankly, not up to the job. He wasn't a "bad" man in the way we think of villains, but he was a terrible king for the 15th century. He was pious, shy, and suffered from bouts of mental illness where he couldn't even recognize his own son. In a world where the King was supposed to be a warrior-judge, having a void at the top is dangerous.

The vacuum was filled by two groups: the Lancastrians (Henry's side) and the Yorkists (led by Richard, Duke of York).

Richard of York felt he was doing everyone a favor. He was rich, successful, and had a pretty solid claim to the throne himself. But Henry's wife, Margaret of Anjou, wasn't having any of it. She was fierce. She was protective. And she basically became the real leader of the Lancastrian cause. When you look at the primary sources, like the Paston Letters, you see how normal people were just trying to survive while these giants stepped on everything.

The Myth of the Roses

Here's a fun fact: nobody at the time called it the "Wars of the Roses." That’s a branding exercise that happened much later, popularized by Sir Walter Scott and, of course, Shakespeare.

While the House of York did use the white rose as a badge, the red rose wasn't even the primary symbol for the House of Lancaster until the very end of the conflict. They used all sorts of badges—swans, antelopes, suns with streams of light. The "War of the Roses" name makes it sound like a botanical garden show. It was actually more of a brutal scramble for survival.

The Turning Point at Towton

If you want to understand the sheer scale of the violence, you have to look at the Battle of Towton in 1461. It happened on Palm Sunday in a literal blinding snowstorm.

👉 See also: Why People That Died on Their Birthday Are More Common Than You Think

Historians like George Goodwin have detailed how this single day became the bloodiest ever fought on English soil. Estimates vary, but we’re talking roughly 28,000 dead in a single afternoon. That’s about 1% of the entire English population at the time. Imagine a modern war killing millions of people in a few hours.

The ground was so soaked with blood that it didn't even sink in; it just ran off into the rivers.

York won that day. Edward IV, Richard's son, took the crown. He was tall, handsome, and loved women and wine. He was basically the 15th-century version of a rock star. For a while, things seemed settled. But in this era, "settled" was a relative term.

Betrayal is a Habit

The Wars of the Roses weren't a constant war. There were years of peace. Then someone would get offended, a Duke would switch sides, and everyone would be back in the saddle.

Take the "Kingmaker," Richard Neville, Earl of Warwick. He helped Edward IV get the throne. Then he got annoyed because Edward married Elizabeth Woodville—a "commoner" widow—instead of a French princess Warwick had picked out. So, Warwick just... switched sides. He teamed up with his old enemy Margaret of Anjou to put the mentally ill Henry VI back on the throne.

It was messy. It was personal. It was basically a high-stakes soap opera with plate armor.

The Mystery of the Princes in the Tower

You can’t talk about the Wars of the Roses without mentioning the darkest chapter: the disappearance of Edward V and his brother Richard.

✨ Don't miss: Marie Kondo The Life Changing Magic of Tidying Up: What Most People Get Wrong

When Edward IV died unexpectedly in 1483, his brother Richard III took over. He declared his nephews illegitimate and locked them in the Tower of London for "protection." They were never seen again.

Did Richard kill them? Most traditional historians, following the Tudor-era accounts like those of Sir Thomas More, say yes. But groups like the Richard III Society argue he was framed. They point out that Richard had no reason to kill them if they were already illegitimate, and that Henry VII (the guy who took over later) had just as much motive to get rid of any rival claimants.

The discovery of Richard III’s skeleton under a parking lot in Leicester in 2012 didn't solve the murder mystery, but it did prove he had scoliosis—though he wasn't the "withered-arm" monster Shakespeare described.

How the Tudor Dynasty Finally Ended the Chaos

Eventually, everyone was tired. The old nobility had basically killed each other off.

Enter Henry Tudor. He was a long-shot candidate with a very shaky claim to the throne, living in exile in France. But he had one thing going for him: he was the last man standing.

At the Battle of Bosworth Field in 1485, Richard III was killed (famously shouting for a horse, according to the play, though in reality, he died fighting bravely in a final charge). Henry became Henry VII. To make sure the fighting stopped, he married Elizabeth of York—the daughter of the Yorkist King Edward IV.

He literally married the opposition.

🔗 Read more: Why Transparent Plus Size Models Are Changing How We Actually Shop

That’s where the "Tudor Rose" comes from. He took the white and the red and smashed them together into one logo. It was a brilliant piece of PR. It signaled that the era of the Wars of the Roses was over and a new, unified England had begun.

Why This History Still Hits Different

You've probably noticed that George R.R. Martin used this for Game of Thrones. The Starks and Lannisters are very thin veils for the Yorks and Lancasters.

But the real history is often weirder.

There's a psychological weight to this period. It shows what happens when a country loses its sense of truth and stable leadership. When the rules of succession become "whoever has the biggest army," everyone loses. The Wars of the Roses ended the Middle Ages in England and paved the way for the absolute power of the Tudors—Henry VIII, Elizabeth I, and the rest.

Real World Insights: How to Explore This History Today

If you actually want to "feel" the Wars of the Roses, don't just read a textbook. History is best experienced on the ground.

  • Visit the Battlefields: Go to Towton or Bosworth. Standing on a silent field where 20,000 people died is a sobering experience that no documentary can replicate. The Bosworth Battlefield Heritage Centre is particularly good for seeing the actual spot where Richard III fell.
  • Check the Primary Sources: Look up the Paston Letters. These are real letters from a family living through the wars. They talk about lawsuits, grocery lists, and "oh by the way, the King's army is nearby." It makes the history human.
  • Look at the Architecture: Many English cathedrals, like York Minster or St George's Chapel at Windsor, are filled with the tombs and heraldry of the people who fought these wars. Look for the "Sun in Splendour" (York) or the "Swan" (Lancaster) carved into the stone.
  • Read Nuanced Biographies: Instead of general overviews, find books on the specific women of the era. The Red Queen and The White Queen by Philippa Gregory are fiction, but they’ve sparked a huge interest in the real figures like Margaret Beaufort and Elizabeth Woodville. For non-fiction, check out Dan Jones or Alison Weir.

The Wars of the Roses weren't just about who sat on a chair. They were about the slow, painful birth of a modern nation out of the wreckage of a family feud. To understand modern Britain, you have to understand the scars left by the roses.


Actionable Steps for History Enthusiasts

To get a deeper grasp of this era beyond the surface level, start by mapping the family tree. Grab a notebook and plot the descent from Edward III; you'll quickly see how the overlapping claims made the conflict inevitable. If you're traveling, prioritize the "Middleham Jewel" at the Yorkshire Museum or the Richard III Visitor Centre in Leicester. For those who prefer digital exploration, the UK National Archives holds digitized versions of many 15th-century legal rolls that show how the war affected commoners through land seizures and "attainders."

The best way to learn is to follow the money and the bloodlines—usually, they lead to the same place.