The War on Normal People: Why Andrew Yang’s Warning Still Hits Home

The War on Normal People: Why Andrew Yang’s Warning Still Hits Home

Automation is a quiet thief. It doesn't usually walk into a room and announce its presence with a fanfare or a pink slip. Instead, it’s the self-checkout kiosk that replaces three cashiers, the software update that makes a back-office accounting role redundant, or the "smart" warehouse system that turns a human picker into a biological cog. Andrew Yang’s 2018 book, The War on Normal People, basically predicted the specific kind of economic vertigo we’re all feeling right now. He wasn’t just talking about robots taking over factories. He was talking about the Great Displacement.

The math is brutal. Honestly, it’s terrifying if you actually look at the labor participation rates in the American Midwest. We’ve been told for decades that "new jobs will replace the old ones," but that’s a half-truth that ignores the reality of geography and skill sets. A 50-year-old truck driver in Ohio isn't going to suddenly become a junior software developer in Palo Alto just because ChatGPT can now write Python scripts. The gap between what the economy wants and what "normal people" are trained to do is widening into a canyon.

The Disappearance of the Middle-Class Anchor

We used to have these things called "good jobs." You know the ones. They paid enough for a mortgage, a minivan, and maybe a week at the lake. But as Yang points out in The War on Normal People, those jobs were the first to get optimized out of existence. Manufacturing was the canary in the coal mine. Between 2000 and 2015, the US lost about 5 million manufacturing jobs. While politicians like to blame trade deals or "moving jobs overseas," the reality is that about 80% of those losses were due to automation and productivity gains. We’re making more stuff than ever; we just need fewer humans to do it.

Now, the "war" has moved to the service sector. This is where the majority of Americans work. Retail, call centers, food service, and trucking. These four categories alone employ tens of millions of people. If you replace a human at a drive-thru window with an AI voice assistant, you aren't just "improving efficiency." You are removing the entry-level rungs of the economic ladder.

The psychological toll is massive. Men, in particular, have been dropping out of the workforce at alarming rates. When you lose your job, you often lose your sense of purpose. Yang discusses how "deaths of despair"—suicide and drug overdoses—correlate almost perfectly with the decline of stable employment in rural counties. It’s not just a lack of money. It’s a lack of a reason to get out of bed in the morning.

Why the "Retraining" Myth is Failing

Every time a factory closes, some politician stands behind a podium and promises "retraining programs." It sounds great on paper. In practice? It’s kind of a disaster. The success rate of federal retraining programs is historically abysmal, often hovering below 10% for meaningful career pivots. You can’t just "teach a coal miner to code" and expect the economy to fix itself.

📖 Related: Olin Corporation Stock Price: What Most People Get Wrong

The Realities of Human Capital

  • Cognitive flexibility: Not everyone is wired for high-level abstract problem-solving in a digital environment.
  • Geographic immobility: People have roots, families, and houses they can't sell in depressed markets.
  • Ageism: Companies are rarely looking to hire a 55-year-old "retrained" worker when they can hire a 22-year-old digital native.

The "War on Normal People" is fought on the battlefield of the 21st-century economy, which values capital and intellectual property over labor. If you own the robot, you win. If you are the person the robot replaces, you lose. It’s a winner-take-all system that leaves the average person—the "normal" person—scrambling for scraps in the gig economy. Driving for Uber or delivering for DoorDash isn't a career; it's a desperate play for liquidity while the algorithm slowly lowers your pay.

Universal Basic Income: A Floor or a Ceiling?

The centerpiece of Yang’s argument is Universal Basic Income (UBI), specifically a "Freedom Dividend" of $1,000 a month. Back in 2018, people thought this was a radical, fringe idea. Then 2020 happened. The stimulus checks during the pandemic were basically a massive, unplanned pilot program for UBI. And guess what? People didn't stop working en masse. They paid for car repairs, they bought school supplies, and they stayed afloat.

Critics argue that UBI will lead to hyperinflation or a lazy workforce. But if you look at the data from the Alaska Permanent Fund or the various UBI pilots in cities like Stockton, California, the results are different. People generally use the money to improve their lives. The problem is that $1,000 a month doesn't solve the "purpose" problem. It solves the "survival" problem.

We are moving toward a world where labor is no longer the primary way we distribute resources. That is a fundamental shift in human history. For thousands of years, if you didn't work, you didn't eat. Now, we have so much abundance generated by machines that we could theoretically feed and house everyone, but our social structures are still stuck in the 1950s.

The Cognitive Elite vs. The Rest of Us

There’s a growing divide that isn't just about money—it's about "merit." In the world of The War on Normal People, we’ve created a system that worships high-IQ, high-education individuals while treating everyone else as disposable. If you didn't go to an elite university or learn to navigate the digital world, the economy increasingly has no place for you.

👉 See also: Funny Team Work Images: Why Your Office Slack Channel Is Obsessed With Them

This creates a "bubble" where the people making the decisions (in DC or Silicon Valley) have no idea what life is like in a town where the biggest employer just installed 500 robotic arms. They see "efficiency" and "stock buybacks." The people on the ground see a ghost town. This isn't just an economic issue; it's a recipe for civil unrest. When a large percentage of the population feels like the future has no room for them, they tend to want to tear down the present.

AI and the Next Wave of Displacement

If you thought the first wave of automation was tough, wait until you see what LLMs (Large Language Models) are doing to white-collar work. This is the new front in the war on normal people. Paralegals, junior analysts, copywriters, and customer service reps are now in the crosshairs. It’s no longer just blue-collar labor. The "cognitive" jobs we thought were safe are actually the easiest to automate because they exist entirely as data on a screen.

  • Law firms are using AI to do document discovery in seconds, a task that used to take dozens of associates weeks.
  • Medical diagnostics are being handled by algorithms that can spot tumors more accurately than radiologists.
  • Coding is becoming a "supervisory" role where the human just checks the AI’s work.

This means the "escape hatch" of getting a college degree is getting smaller. We are over-producing graduates for jobs that are being liquidated by GPT-5 and its successors.

Actionable Steps to Navigate the New Economy

You can't stop the tide, but you can learn to swim. If the "normal" path is being disrupted, you have to deviate.

1. Prioritize High-Touch Human Value
Focus on roles that require physical presence, empathy, or complex manual dexterity that robots still struggle with. Skilled trades (plumbing, electrical work, HVAC) are currently more "AI-proof" than middle-management office jobs. Humans will always pay a premium for human connection in therapy, coaching, and high-end hospitality.

✨ Don't miss: Mississippi Taxpayer Access Point: How to Use TAP Without the Headache

2. Decentralize Your Income
Don't rely on a single employer for your entire survival. The "War on Normal People" is characterized by volatility. Building side income streams or owning small pieces of equity in different ventures provides a safety net when your primary industry gets "disrupted."

3. Advocate for Human-Centered Capitalism
Support policies that shift the tax burden away from labor and toward automation. Currently, companies pay payroll taxes for humans but get tax breaks for buying robots. That’s an incentive structure that actively works against "normal people." We need to change the metrics of our economy from GDP and the S&P 500 to things like life expectancy, mental health, and childhood success rates.

4. Build Local Resilience
Strengthen your local community. In an era of digital isolation, your physical neighbors are your best defense against economic shocks. Tool libraries, community gardens, and local barter networks might sound old-school, but they provide a level of security that a faceless corporation never will.

The "War on Normal People" isn't a conspiracy. It’s the natural outcome of a market that values efficiency above all else. Recognizing that the game is rigged is the first step toward changing the rules. We have to decide if the point of an economy is to serve the people, or if the people are just fuel for the economy. Right now, it feels like the latter. It's time to tilt the scales back.