It is a mess. If you try to look at the War of the Roses family tree expecting a neat, vertical line of succession, you are going to get a headache. Seriously. This isn't just history; it’s a high-stakes game of genetic musical chairs that nearly wiped out the English nobility. To understand why people were killing their cousins for thirty years, you have to look at one guy: Edward III. He had too many sons. That’s basically the whole problem.
Edward III was a powerhouse who reigned for fifty years, but he left behind a ticking time bomb of a family tree. He had five sons who survived into adulthood. Each of those sons thought their specific branch deserved the crown more than the others. By the time 1455 rolled around, the descendants of these brothers were so entangled through intermarriage and "accidental" deaths that everyone had a legitimate-sounding claim to the throne. It was a disaster waiting to happen.
The Plantagenet Root of the Problem
Everything starts with the House of Plantagenet. For centuries, they held the power. But when Edward III’s eldest son, the Black Prince, died before his father, the crown skipped a generation and went to a ten-year-old boy named Richard II. He was the grandson. He was also, by most historical accounts, a bit of a nightmare to deal with.
In 1399, Henry Bolingbroke (who became Henry IV) got tired of Richard’s nonsense, kicked him off the throne, and locked him in a castle where he mysteriously "died." This is the moment the War of the Roses family tree splits into the two famous factions. Henry IV was from the House of Lancaster, the descendants of Edward III’s third son, John of Gaunt. This move made the Lancastrians kings, but it also created a massive legal loophole that the House of York would eventually drive a tank through.
Why? Because the House of York, descending from Edward III’s fourth son, Edmund of Langley, also had a claim through the female line of the second son, Lionel of Antwerp. In the medieval mind, seniority mattered. The Yorkists argued that because their claim came from an older brother (Lionel) than the Lancaster claim (John), they were the rightful kings. It’s basically the world’s deadliest HR dispute.
York vs. Lancaster: The Main Players
You’ve probably heard of the Red Rose and the White Rose. Honestly, that's mostly Shakespearean branding. At the time, people didn't walk around wearing giant flower badges every day. It was about land, titles, and who you were related to.
The House of Lancaster was led by Henry VI. He was a disaster. He inherited the throne as a baby, suffered from bouts of mental illness where he couldn't speak for a year at a time, and was generally too "saintly" to rule a pack of bloodthirsty dukes. His wife, Margaret of Anjou, was the real power. She was fierce, French, and absolutely determined to keep her son, Edward of Westminster, on the throne.
📖 Related: Gwendoline Butler Dead in a Row: Why This 1957 Mystery Still Packs a Punch
On the other side, you had Richard, Duke of York. He was the wealthiest man in England. He looked at Henry VI and thought, "I could do a better job." And he was probably right. Richard’s father had been executed for treason, but his mother brought him that crucial claim from the second son of Edward III. He didn't initially want to be King; he just wanted to be the guy running things for the sick King. But Margaret of Anjou didn't trust him. Once blood was spilled at the First Battle of St Albans in 1455, there was no going back.
The Three Sons of York
Richard of York died in battle, but his sons were tall, handsome, and terrifyingly good at war.
- Edward IV: The big brother. He was 6'4", a brilliant general, and a total womanizer. He actually managed to win the war for a while.
- George, Duke of Clarence: The middle child. He was a serial traitor. He eventually got drowned in a vat of Malmsey wine because his brothers were fed up with his constant switching of sides.
- Richard III: The little brother. History (and Shakespeare) turned him into a hunchbacked villain, but the reality is more complex. He was loyal to Edward IV until Edward died, then things got weird.
The Woodville Factor and the Breakdown of the Tree
Everything changed when Edward IV decided to marry for love—or lust. He secretly married Elizabeth Woodville, a widow from a minor family who happened to be Lancastrian supporters. This blew up the War of the Roses family tree in a whole new way.
The old nobility hated the Woodvilles. They were seen as social climbers. Edward’s best friend, the Earl of Warwick (known as the Kingmaker), was so offended that he actually switched sides and tried to put the Lancastrians back on the throne. This period is a dizzying cycle of: King Edward flees, King Henry is pulled out of the Tower and put on the throne, then Edward comes back, kills the Lancastrian heir, and Henry "dies" in prison.
By 1471, the House of Lancaster was basically extinct in the male line. Edward IV was back on top. It looked like York had won. But then Edward died young, leaving two small sons—the famous Princes in the Tower.
Richard III and the End of the Yorkist Dream
This is where the family tree gets truly dark. Richard III, the boys' uncle, declared his brother’s marriage to Elizabeth Woodville invalid. He claimed the kids were illegitimate. He took the throne for himself, and the boys vanished. Whether he killed them or not is still the biggest "cold case" in British history, but the optics were terrible.
👉 See also: Why ASAP Rocky F kin Problems Still Runs the Club Over a Decade Later
Even Yorkist loyalists started looking for an alternative. And that alternative was a guy living in exile in France: Henry Tudor.
How the Tudors Solved the Puzzle
If you look at Henry Tudor’s place on the War of the Roses family tree, it’s incredibly shaky. He was a Lancastrian, but his claim came through his mother, Margaret Beaufort. Margaret was a descendant of John of Gaunt’s legitimized children—the Beauforts—who were technically barred from the throne.
Henry Tudor wasn't even the "main" Lancastrian; he was just the only one left alive.
At the Battle of Bosworth Field in 1485, Richard III was killed. Henry became Henry VII. But he knew his claim was weak. To fix the fractured family tree, he did something brilliant: he married Elizabeth of York, the daughter of Edward IV.
By marrying the "White Rose," he joined the two competing bloodlines. Their children, including the infamous Henry VIII, carried the blood of both Lancaster and York. This is why the Tudor Rose is half-red and half-white. It wasn't just a pretty logo; it was a political statement that the civil war was over because the two trees had finally become one.
Misconceptions You Should Know
People think this was a war of the "common people." It wasn't. It was a private feud between cousins that occasionally involved thousands of unlucky soldiers. Most of the country just wanted to be left alone to farm their peas.
✨ Don't miss: Ashley My 600 Pound Life Now: What Really Happened to the Show’s Most Memorable Ashleys
Another big myth is that the "Roses" terminology was used by everyone. Most people at the time referred to it as the "civil wars" or the "troubles." The "War of the Roses" name was popularized much later, especially in the 19th century.
Also, don't assume the tree stopped being messy after 1485. Henry VII spent his entire reign terrified of "Pretenders"—men like Lambert Simnel and Perkin Warbeck who claimed to be the missing Princes in the Tower or other Yorkist heirs. The family tree still had plenty of branches that Henry felt the need to prune. He executed a lot of people just to make sure the Tudor line stayed the only line.
Key Evidence from Modern Research
In 2012, the discovery of Richard III's skeleton under a parking lot in Leicester changed what we know about the War of the Roses family tree from a DNA perspective. The mitochondrial DNA (passed through the female line) matched modern descendants perfectly. However, the Y-chromosome (passed through the male line) did not match. This suggests there was an "infidelity event" somewhere in the tree. Basically, someone was a "false" Plantagenet. This could potentially mean that several kings weren't technically who they said they were, biologically speaking.
How to Trace the Tree Yourself
If you want to dive deeper into this, start by looking at a map of the descendants of Edward III. Focus on the four main branches:
- The House of Lancaster (John of Gaunt)
- The House of York (Lionel of Antwerp and Edmund of Langley)
- The Beauforts (The "illegitimate" line that became the Tudors)
- The Nevilles (The powerful in-laws who controlled the balance of power)
The complexity of the War of the Roses family tree is why the history is so enduring. It’s a story of how a single family’s success—having too many healthy, ambitious heirs—became its ultimate downfall.
To truly grasp the scale of this, your next step should be to look at the "Titulus Regius." This was the document Richard III used to justify taking the throne. It outlines the specific genealogical arguments used to invalidate Edward IV’s children. Reading the primary justifications of the time shows you that for these people, the family tree wasn't just a chart; it was a legal weapon used to justify execution and crownings alike. Seek out the family trees of the "Great Northern Families" like the Percys and the Nevilles as well, because without their marriages into the royal line, the wars would have likely fizzled out in a single generation.