Honestly, the internet is a weird place. You’ve probably seen the phrase video of charlie kirk being shit popping up in your feed lately, usually accompanied by some grainy footage of a college campus debate or a heated podcast clip. It’s one of those search terms that feels like it’s been ripped straight from a Reddit thread where someone’s just venting. But behind the aggressive phrasing, there’s actually a massive, tangled web of recent events that changed the landscape of American political media in 2025 and 2026.
Basically, if you’re looking for "that one video," you’re likely looking for a specific moment from the final tour of the late Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder.
Before he was assassinated in September 2025, Kirk was on his "American Comeback Tour." He was doing what he always did: sitting behind a table with a "Prove Me Wrong" sign and inviting college students to a verbal cage match. But as the political climate grew more toxic, these videos stopped being about "intellectual debate" and started becoming raw, uncomfortable, and—depending on who you ask—downright "shit."
The Moment Everything Went Sideways
One of the most widely shared clips—the one people often refer to when they use that specific, unflattering search term—comes from a late 2024 event where Kirk was questioned about his stance on the Civil Rights Act. This wasn't just a minor disagreement. Kirk had started vocalizing a "radical view" that passing the 1964 Civil Rights Act was a "huge mistake."
Imagine the scene: a crowded campus plaza, a young student trying to hold their ground, and Kirk doubling down on the idea that federal protections against discrimination created a "permanent DEI-type bureaucracy."
It was a PR disaster for many, but a viral goldmine for others.
📖 Related: Fire in Idyllwild California: What Most People Get Wrong
Critics labeled the footage as a video of charlie kirk being shit because, to them, it represented a bridge too far—moving from standard conservatism into territory that many felt was openly regressive. The video didn't just stay on YouTube; it mutated. It was clipped for TikTok, edited with phonk music, and used by both sides to prove their point. Supporters saw a man "telling the truth," while opponents saw a man dismantling the foundation of modern American equality.
The Utah Valley University Video
Then there’s the final video. The one that’s actually tragic.
On September 10, 2025, Kirk was at Utah Valley University. The footage from that day is haunting. He was answering a question about mass shootings—specifically arguing that the Second Amendment was worth the "cost" of gun deaths—when he was shot by a sniper.
Because the internet has no chill, the term video of charlie kirk being shit started being used by some of the most cynical corners of the web to describe his final debate performance or the chaos that followed. It’s pretty dark, honestly. While many mourned, others used the search term to find clips of him making "incendiary" comments right before the end, leading to a massive crackdown by platforms like YouTube and Meta on "celebratory" content.
Why These Videos Keep Ranking
You’ve probably noticed that even months after his death, this stuff still trends. Why?
👉 See also: Who Is More Likely to Win the Election 2024: What Most People Get Wrong
Part of it is the "Kirkified" meme culture. After he passed, AI-generated videos started surfacing—oddly specific ones where figures like Donald Trump or JD Vance are "singing" a tribute song called "We Are Charlie Kirk." It’s bizarre. One TikTok user, cp_alo, called it the "worst f**king song" they’d ever heard, and that video alone got over eight million views.
When people search for a video of charlie kirk being shit, they’re often falling into a rabbit hole of:
- Real clips of him arguing about "prowling Blacks" (a quote from his podcast that caused a massive firestorm).
- AI-generated "tribute" videos that look and sound like a fever dream.
- Footage of teachers being fired for posting "crass" reactions to his assassination.
The Candace Owens Factor
If you think the videos from the campus tours were wild, the stuff coming out in early 2026 is next level. Candace Owens has basically taken over the "controversial video" niche. She recently dropped a bombshell claiming Kirk told her he was a "time traveler" being hunted by shadowy forces.
Yeah, you read that right.
Owens has been posting videos questioning his security detail, specifically calling out Brian Harpole. She’s even floated theories that he was "marked and martyred" by the deep state to prevent some future outcome. This has created a whole new wave of content where people are recording themselves reacting to her claims, often labeling the original Owens segments as "shit" because they feel like they’ve crossed from politics into science fiction.
✨ Don't miss: Air Pollution Index Delhi: What Most People Get Wrong
The Impact of the "Prove Me Wrong" Legacy
Kirk’s style was built for the algorithm. He wanted the conflict. He wanted the video to look like he was "destroying" a liberal student, or conversely, for the student's supporters to think they "schooled" him.
But the reality caught up with the content.
The 2025-2026 era of TPUSA has been defined by this "fracture" that Erika Kirk (his widow and new CEO) keeps talking about. At the AmericaFest conference in Phoenix, the videos coming out weren't of students vs. Kirk—they were of conservatives vs. conservatives. Ben Shapiro and Tucker Carlson were basically at each other's throats over how to handle the movement's direction.
Actionable Insights: How to Navigate the Noise
If you’re trying to find legitimate information amidst all the "shit" videos and AI-generated memes, here’s how to do it without losing your mind:
- Check the Date: A lot of the "viral" videos being shared right now are actually from 2023 or 2024, but they’re being re-uploaded as "new" to farm engagement. If you see Kirk at a table, look for the tour name on the banner.
- Verify the Source: If the video shows a celebrity singing a tribute, it’s AI. Every single time. The "ViVO Tunes" account is the main culprit here.
- Distinguish Between Opinion and Event: Many videos titled video of charlie kirk being shit are actually just 20-minute video essays by YouTubers. If you want the raw footage, search for the specific university name (like "UC Berkeley" or "UVU") plus the date.
- Watch Out for Doxxing Sites: There was a site called "Charlie’s Murderers" (later the Charlie Kirk Data Foundation) that was gathering info on people who posted negative videos. It’s mostly down now, but stay off those weird third-party databases.
The legacy of these videos isn't just about political debate anymore. It’s about how a single person’s media output can be "weaponized" long after they’re gone. Whether you think the content is "shit" or "vital," the sheer volume of it ensures that the algorithm won't let us forget it anytime soon.
If you’re looking to dive deeper, your best bet is to look up the official archives of "The Charlie Kirk Show" or the "Surrounded" debate series to see the full context of the clips that usually get cut into 30-second outrages. Just be prepared—it’s a long, strange trip through the heart of American division.