It’s a slur that refuses to die. You’ve probably seen it on social media comments or heard about it in some viral news story where a celebrity or politician gets caught saying something "racist." The idea that black people look like monkeys isn't just a random insult. Honestly, it’s one of the most calculated, long-running pieces of propaganda in human history. It’s heavy stuff. It’s also factually hollow, but that hasn't stopped it from being used to justify some of the worst atrocities of the last few hundred years.
Words matter. Images matter more.
When you see a caricature of a Black person with simian features, you’re looking at a tool. It was designed to do a very specific job: to make a group of human beings look like they weren't human at all. If you can convince a population that another group is "animal-like," it becomes a lot easier to take away their rights, their land, and their lives. This is basically the "pseudo-science" playbook that fueled the transatlantic slave trade and Jim Crow laws.
The Scientific Racism That Built the Lie
Back in the 18th and 19th centuries, "scientists"—and I use that term very loosely—were obsessed with categorization. They wanted to rank everything. Naturally, being European, they put themselves at the top. Guys like Petrus Camper and Josiah Nott spent their careers trying to prove a biological link between African people and primates.
They used something called facial angle measurements.
Camper developed a theory where he measured the slope of the face. He argued that a "perfect" Greek statue had a vertical profile, while apes had a sloped one. Then, he conveniently placed African people right in the middle. It was total nonsense. There was no biological basis for it, but it gave people a "scientific" excuse to treat others as property. This wasn't just a fringe theory; it was the mainstream academic standard of the time.
📖 Related: Sweden School Shooting 2025: What Really Happened at Campus Risbergska
It’s actually wild how much effort went into this. They wrote massive textbooks filled with sketches that purposefully exaggerated features to make the "black people look like monkeys" comparison seem visual and obvious. This wasn't just about being mean. It was about economics. If Black people were "closer to animals," then the moral problem of slavery simply disappeared. You don't give a horse the right to vote, right? That was their logic. It was a brutal, effective way to dehumanize an entire race for profit.
Pop Culture and the "Monkey" Trope
The damage didn't stop with dusty textbooks. It moved into the things people did for fun. Think about Minstrel shows. These were incredibly popular in the 1800s and early 1900s. White performers would put on blackface and act out "animalistic" or "savage" behaviors. They portrayed Black men and women as being governed by instinct rather than intellect.
Basically, it was a way to laugh at the idea of Black humanity.
Then came the movies. Take King Kong (1933). While some see it as a simple monster movie, many historians and cultural critics, like Dr. David Pilgrim of the Jim Crow Museum, point out the subtext. The giant ape being brought from a "primitive" island to a "civilized" city and obsessing over a white woman? That mirrored the exact fears and stereotypes used to justify lynchings in the American South. The visual of the "beast" was a direct stand-in for the racist caricatures of Black men that had been circulated for decades.
This trope even leaked into sports. Even recently, Black soccer players in Europe have had bananas thrown at them on the pitch. It’s a specific, targeted attempt to remind them of that old, dehumanizing hierarchy. It’s not just a "joke." It’s an assertion of power. It's a way of saying, "You don't belong in the human circle."
👉 See also: Will Palestine Ever Be Free: What Most People Get Wrong
Why the Biology Doesn't Back It Up
Let’s get into the actual science for a second. Evolutionarily speaking, all humans share about 98-99% of our DNA with chimpanzees. We are all primates. But here is the kicker: there is absolutely no evidence that one race is "closer" to apes than another.
Genetic diversity is actually highest within the African continent. This means there is more genetic variation between two different groups in Africa than there is between an average European and an average East Asian. The physical traits we associate with "race"—skin color, hair texture, nose shape—are tiny adaptations to climate and environment. They have nothing to do with how "evolved" a person is.
- Skin color is basically just a biological sunblock (melanin).
- Facial structures are often adaptations to humidity and temperature.
- None of these traits correlate with cognitive ability or "ape-like" behavior.
In fact, if you want to get technical about "primitive" traits (traits that haven't changed much from an ancestor), some traits common in European populations, like thin lips or high amounts of body hair, are actually more "simian" than traits found in African populations. But you don't see posters about that, do you? That's because the "monkey" comparison was never about biology. It was always about power and social standing.
The Psychological Impact of Dehumanization
When you hear that black people look like monkeys, it’s not just an insult that hurts feelings. It has real-world consequences on how people are treated by the law and by society. There’s a famous study by Phillip Atiba Goff and colleagues that looked at this exact phenomenon. They found that people who were subconsciously primed with images of apes were more likely to justify police violence against Black suspects.
It’s terrifying.
✨ Don't miss: JD Vance River Raised Controversy: What Really Happened in Ohio
If the brain associates a group with animals, it skips the empathy response. This "dehumanization" makes it easier for people to look at systemic inequality and say, "Well, that’s just how they are." It prevents us from seeing the person and instead makes us see a caricature. It’s why representation in media is so vital. If the only images kids see of themselves are negative or animalistic, it affects their self-worth. If the only images the rest of the world sees are those same caricatures, it affects how they vote, how they hire, and how they treat their neighbors.
Breaking the Cycle: What We Can Do Now
So, how do we actually deal with this? It’s not enough to just say "don't be racist." We have to understand the history to recognize when it’s happening in real-time.
First, we need to call it what it is. It’s not a "gaffe" or a "misunderstanding" when someone uses this trope. It’s an appeal to a 400-year-old system of dehumanization. Whether it’s a politician making a "joke" or a random guy on X (formerly Twitter), the intent is the same: to strip away humanity.
Second, education is key. Museums like the Jim Crow Museum of Racist Memorabilia at Ferris State University do incredible work by showing these objects and explaining their history. When you see the sheer volume of "monkey" themed toys, postcards, and advertisements from the past, you realize it wasn't an accident. It was a campaign.
Third, support diverse media. The best way to kill a caricature is with reality. When we see Black people portrayed as complex, multifaceted humans—as scientists, stay-at-home dads, villains, heroes, and everything in between—the old "simian" trope starts to look as ridiculous as it actually is.
Steps for Moving Forward:
- Educate yourself on the history of pseudo-science. Read up on the works of Stephen Jay Gould, specifically The Mismeasure of Man, which deconstructs how "science" was used to rank races.
- Recognize the "Dog Whistle." Understand that modern racist rhetoric often uses coded language. Comparison to animals is one of the oldest and most obvious "dog whistles" in the book.
- Support Black creators. By amplifying authentic stories, we crowd out the outdated and harmful imagery that has persisted for far too long.
- Speak up in digital spaces. Algorithms often reward controversy. When you see dehumanizing content, report it. Don't just ignore it; help platforms understand that this isn't "free speech"—it's a targeted tool of harassment with a violent history.
The idea that black people look like monkeys is a lie that was sold to the world to make a few people very rich and powerful. It’s a relic of a darker time, but its echoes are still loud today. By understanding the "why" behind the slur, we take away its power. It’s about looking past the propaganda and seeing the human being in front of you. That sounds simple, but in a world built on these myths, it’s actually a pretty radical act.